Abstract
Accounting with antirival tokens, i.e., accounting based on shareable units that gain value with increased use, enables efficient and effective collective action. However, most currencies are rival tokens which can naturally represent — and be exchanged to — rival goods, such as a cup of coffee. Antirival systems of account would be a natural fit for the economy of antirival goods because the logic of value creation and accounting would be compatible. It is challenging to find an allocatively efficient price for antirival goods, such as data, measured in rival units of account. We present an antirival accounting system based on Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT), where the fundamental operation is sharing instead of exchanging and study it with system dynamics models and simulations. We illustrate our arguments by presenting a system known as Streamr Awards that defines three tokens of a fundamentally novel type, shareable non-fungible token (sNFT). We present the functioning of one of these in the work allocation of a self-directed online community.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
ERC-5023: https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-5023.
- 2.
A more detailed description in the Streamr blog: https://blog.streamr.network/streamr-awards-are-here-contribute-and-earn-unique-snfts/.
References
Berg, A., Berg, C.: Exit, voice, and forking. Cosmos+ Taxis 8(8), 9 (2017)
Berg, A., Berg, C., Novak, M.: Blockchains and constitutional catallaxy. Const. Polit. Econ. 31(2), 188–204 (2020)
Cavana, R.Y., Dangerfield, B.C., Pavlov, O.V., Radzicki, M.J., Wheat, I.D. (eds.): Feedback Economics. CST, Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67190-7
Davis, J.P., Eisenhardt, K.M., Bingham, C.B.: Developing theory through simulation methods. Acad. Manag. Rev. 32(2), 480–499 (2007)
Elo, T.M., et al.: Improving IoT federation resiliency with distributed ledger technology. IEEE Access 9, 161695–161708 (2021)
Xavier Olleros, F.: Antirival goods, network effects and the sharing economy | First Monday. First Monday 23(2) (2018)
de Gooyert, V.: Developing dynamic organizational theories; three system dynamics based research strategies. Qual. Quant. 53(2), 653–666 (2019)
Hines, R.D.: Financial accounting: in communicating reality, we construct reality. Acc. Organ. Soc. 13(3), 251–261 (1988)
Kornberger, M., Pflueger, D., Mouritsen, J.: Evaluative infrastructures: accounting for platform organization. Acc. Organ. Soc. 60, 79–95 (2017)
Koutroumpis, P., Leiponen, A., Thomas, L.D.: Markets for data. Ind. Corp. Change 29(3), 645–660 (2020)
Lawrence, T.B., Suddaby, R.: 1.6 institutions and institutional work. The Sage Handbook of Organization Studies, pp. 215–254. Sage Thousand Oaks, CA, USA (2006)
Lehenchuk, S., Zhyhlei, I., Syvak, O.: Understanding accounting as a social and institutional practice: possible exit of accounting science from crisis. Account. Financ. Control 3(1), 11–22 (2020)
Nakamoto, S.: Bitcoin: a peer-to-peer electronic cash system. Tech. rep., Internet (Oct 2008). https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf
Needles, B.E., Powers, M., Crosson, S.V.: Accounting principles. South-Western Cengage Learning (2011)
Nikander, P., Elo, T.: Will the data markets necessarily fail? A position paper. In: 30th European Regional ITS Conference. International Telecommunications Society (ITS), Helsinki, Finland (2019)
Nikander, P., Eloranta, V., Karhu, K., Hiekkanen, K.: Digitalisation, anti-rival compensation and governance: need for experiments. In: Nordic Workshop on Digital Foundations of Business, Operations, and Strategy, p. 7. Aalto University, Espoo, Finland (2020)
Radzicki, M.J.: Institutional Economics, Post-Keynesian Economics, and System Dynamics: Three Strands of a Heterodox Economics, p. 156. University of Michigan Press (2008)
Saeed, K.: Taxation of fiat money using dynamic control. Systems 10(3), 84 (2022)
Sterman, J.D.: Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World. McGraw-Hill Education (2000)
Weyl, E.G., Ohlhaver, P., Buterin, V.: Decentralized Society: finding web3’s soul. SSRN Electronic Journal (2022)
Wood, A.D.: A model to teach non-rival and excludable goods in undergraduate microeconomics. Int. Rev. Econ. Educ. 24, 28–35 (2017)
Acknowledgements
ATARCA received funding from the EU Horizon 2020 agreement No 964678. The authors thank Prof Pekka Nikander for constitutional entrepreneurship, and Prof Juuso Töyli, Prof Len Malczynski, Dr. Sampsa Ruutu, Prof Heikki Hämmäinen, Prof Raimo Kantola, and Prof Petri Mähönen.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Elo, T.M., Marttila, J., Cutillas, S., Hakanen, E. (2023). Elements of Antirival Accounting with sNFT. In: Mikyška, J., de Mulatier, C., Paszynski, M., Krzhizhanovskaya, V.V., Dongarra, J.J., Sloot, P.M. (eds) Computational Science – ICCS 2023. ICCS 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14074. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36021-3_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36021-3_25
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-36020-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-36021-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)