Skip to main content

What and How You Explain Matters: Inquisitive Teachable Agent Scaffolds Knowledge-Building for Tutor Learning

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED 2023)

Abstract

Students learn by teaching a teachable agent, a phenomenon called tutor learning. Literature suggests that tutor learning happens when students (who tutor the teachable agent) actively reflect on their knowledge when responding to the teachable agent’s inquiries (aka knowledge-building). However, most students often lean towards delivering what they already know instead of reflecting on their knowledge (aka knowledge-telling). The knowledge-telling behavior weakens the effect of tutor learning. We hypothesize that the teachable agent can help students commit to knowledge-building by being inquisitive and asking follow-up inquiries when students engage in knowledge-telling. Despite the known benefits of knowledge-building, no prior work has operationalized the identification of knowledge-building and knowledge-telling features from students’ responses to teachable agent’s inquiries and governed them toward knowledge-building. We propose a Constructive Tutee Inquiry that aims to provide follow-up inquiries to guide students toward knowledge-building when they commit to a knowledge-telling response. Results from an evaluation study show that students who were treated by Constructive Tutee Inquiry not only outperformed those who were not treated but also learned to engage in knowledge-building without the aid of follow-up inquiries over time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    \(Normalized\;gain = \frac{Normalized\;Post\;score - Normalized\;Pre score}{{1 - Normalized\;Pre score}}\)

References

  1. Roscoe, R.D., Chi, M.T.H.: Understanding tutor learning: knowledge-building and knowledge-telling in peer tutors’ explanations and questions. Rev. Educ. Res. 77(4), 534–574 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chi, M.T.H., et al.: Learning from human tutoring. Cogn. Sci. 25, 471–533 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Graesser, A.C., Person, N.K., Magliano, J.P.: Collaborative dialogue patterns in naturalistic one-to-one tutoring. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 9(6), 495–522 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Butler, D.L.: Structuring instruction to promote self-regulated learning by adolescents and adults with learning disabilities. Exceptionality 11(1), 39–60 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hong, H.-Y., et al.: Advancing third graders’ reading comprehension through collaborative Knowledge Building: a comparative study in Taiwan. Comput. Educ. 157, 103962 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Roscoe, R.D., Chi, M.: Tutor learning: the role of explaining and responding to questions. Instr. Sci. 36(4), 321–350 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Roscoe, R.D.: Self-monitoring and knowledge-building in learning by teaching. Instr. Sci. 42(3), 327–351 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-013-9283-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Roscoe, R.D., Chi, M.T.H.: The influence of the tutee in learning by peer tutoring. In: Forbus, K., Gentner, D., Regier, T. (eds.) Proceedings of the 26th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 1179–1184. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Roscoe, R.D.: Opportunities and Barriers for Tutor Learning: Knowledge-Building, Metacognition, and Motivation. University of Pittsburgh (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Shahriar, T., Matsuda, N.: “Can you clarify what you said?”: Studying the impact of tutee agents’ follow-up questions on tutors’ learning. In: Roll, I., McNamara, D., Sosnovsky, S., Luckin, R., Dimitrova, V. (eds.) Artificial Intelligence in Education: 22nd International Conference, AIED 2021, Utrecht, The Netherlands, June 14–18, 2021, Proceedings, Part I, pp. 395–407. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78292-4_32

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Matsuda, N., et al.: Learning by teaching simstudent – an initial classroom baseline study comparing with cognitive tutor. In: Biswas, G., Bull, S., Kay, J., Mitrovic, A. (eds.) AIED 2011. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6738, pp. 213–221. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21869-9_29

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Li, N., et al.: Integrating representation learning and skill learning in a human-like intelligent agent. Artif. Intell. 219, 67–91 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Williams, J.J., Lombrozo, T., Rehder, B.: The hazards of explanation: overgeneralization in the face of exceptions. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 142(4), 1006 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rittle-Johnson, B., Loehr, A.M.: Eliciting explanations: constraints on when self-explanation aids learning. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 24(5), 1501–1510 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1079-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Aleven, V.A., Koedinger, K.R.: An effective metacognitive strategy: learning by doing and explaining with a computer-based cognitive tutor. Cogn. Sci. 26(2), 147–179 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mayfield, E., Rosé, C.P.: LightSIDE: Open source machine learning for text. In: Handbook of Automated Essay Evaluation, pp. 146–157. Routledge (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Carolyn, R.: Tools for authoring a dialogue agent that participates in learning studies. Artificial Intelligence. In: Education: Building Technology Rich Learning Contexts That Work, vol. 158, p. 43 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cohen, J.: Theoretical considerations of peer tutoring. Psychol. Sch. 23(2), 175–186 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Nilsson, P.: A framework for investigating qualities of procedural and conceptual knowledge in mathematics—An inferentialist perspective. J. Res. Math. Educ. 51(5), 574–599 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This research was supported by the Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, through grant No. R305A180319 and National Science Foundation grants No. 2112635 (EngageAI Institute) and 1643185 to North Carolina State University. The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not represent views of the Institute or the U.S. Department of Education and NSF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tasmia Shahriar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Shahriar, T., Matsuda, N. (2023). What and How You Explain Matters: Inquisitive Teachable Agent Scaffolds Knowledge-Building for Tutor Learning. In: Wang, N., Rebolledo-Mendez, G., Matsuda, N., Santos, O.C., Dimitrova, V. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13916. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36272-9_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36272-9_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-36271-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-36272-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics