Skip to main content

Help Seekers vs. Help Accepters: Understanding Student Engagement with a Mentor Agent

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED 2023)

Abstract

Help from virtual pedagogical agents has the potential to improve student learning. Yet students often do not seek help when they need it, do not use help effectively, or ignore the agent’s help altogether. This paper seeks to better understand students’ patterns of accepting and seeking help in a computer-based science program called Betty’s Brain. Focusing on student interactions with the mentor agent, Mr. Davis, we examine the factors associated with patterns of help acceptance and help seeking; the relationship between help acceptance and help seeking; and how each behavior is related to learning outcomes. First, we examine whether students accepted help from Mr. Davis, operationalized as whether they followed his suggestions to read specific textbook pages. We find a significant positive relationship between help acceptance and student post-test scores. Despite this, help accepters made fewer positive statements about Mr. Davis in the interviews. Second, we identify how many times students proactively sought help from Mr. Davis. Students who most frequently sought help demonstrated more confusion while learning (measured using an interaction-based ML-based detector); tended to have higher science anxiety; and made more negative statements about Mr. Davis, compared to those who made few or no requests. However, help seeking was not significantly related to post-test scores. Finally, we draw from the qualitative interviews to consider how students understand and articulate their experiences with help from Mr. Davis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Aleven, V., Stahl, E., Schworm, S., Fischer, F., Wallace, R.: Help seeking and help design in interactive learning environments. Rev. Ed. Res. 73, 277–320 (2003). https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543073003277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aleven, V., Roll, I., McLaren, B.M., Koedinger, K.R.: Help helps, but only so much: research on help seeking with intelligent tutoring systems. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 26(1), 205–223 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-015-0089-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Karumbaiah, S., Ocumpaugh, J., Baker, R.S.: Context matters: differing implications of motivation and help-seeking in educational technology. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 32, 685–724 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00272-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Segedy, J.R., Kinnebrew, J.S., Biswas, G.: Investigating the relationship between dialogue responsiveness and learning in a teachable agent environment. In: Biswas, G., Bull, S., Kay, J., Mitrovic, A. (eds.) AIED 2011. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6738, pp. 547–549. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21869-9_97

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Biswas, G., Segedy, J.R., Bunchongchit, K.: From design to implementation to practice a learning by teaching system: betty’s brain. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 26(1), 350–364 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-015-0057-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Karabenick, S.A., Gonida, E.N.: Academic help seeking as a self-regulated learning strategy: current issues, future directions. In: Alexander, P.A., Schunk, D.H., Green, J.A. (eds.) Handbook of Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance, pp. 421–433. Routledge Handbooks Online (2017). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315697048.ch27

  7. Wood, H., Wood, D.: Help seeking, learning and contingent tutoring. Comput Educ. 33, 153–169 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Segedy, J., Kinnebrew, J., Biswas, G.: Supporting student learning using conversational agents in a teachable agent environment. In: van Aalst, J., Thompson, K., Jacobson, M.J., Reimann, P. (eds.) The Future of Learning: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the Learning Sciences, pp. 251–255. International Society of the Learning Sciences, Sydney, Australia (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mathews, M., Mitrović, T., Thomson, D.: Analysing high-level help-seeking behaviour in ITSs. In: Nejdl, W., Kay, J., Pu, P., Herder, E. (eds.) AH 2008. LNCS, vol. 5149, pp. 312–315. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70987-9_42

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Baker, R.S., Corbett, A.T., Koedinger, K.R., Wagner, A.Z.: Off-task behavior in the cognitive tutor classroom: when students “game the system.” In: Proceedings of ACM CHI 2004: Computer-Human Interaction, pp. 383–390 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Roll, I., Baker, R., Aleven, V., Koedinger, K.R.: On the benefits of seeking (and avoiding) help in online problem-solving environments. J. Learn. Sci. 23(4), 537–560 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2014.883977

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Andres, J.M.A.L., Hutt, S., Ocumpaugh, J., Baker, R.S., Nasiar, N., Porter, C.: How anxiety affects affect: a quantitative ethnographic investigation using affect detectors and data-targeted interviews. In: Wasson, B., Zörgő, S. (eds.) Advances in Quantitative Ethnography: Third International Conference, ICQE 2021, Virtual Event, November 6–11, 2021, Proceedings, pp. 268–283. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93859-8_18

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Munshi, A., Biswas, G., Baker, R., Ocumpaugh, J., Hutt, S., Paquette, L.: Analysing adaptive scaffolds that help students develop self-regulated learning behaviours. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 39, 351–368 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hutt, S., Ocumpaugh, J., Andres, J.M.A.L., Munshi, A., Bosch, N., Paquette, L., Biswas, G., Baker, R.: Sharpest tool in the shed: Investigating SMART models of self-regulation and their impact on learning. In: Hsiao, I.-H., Sahebi, S., Bouchet, F., Vie, J.-J. (eds.) Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Educational Data Mining (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jiang, Y., et al.: Expert feature-engineering vs. deep neural networks: which is better for sensor-free affect detection? In: Penstein Rosé, C., et al. (eds.) AIED 2018. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10947, pp. 198–211. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93843-1_15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Hutt, S., et al.: Quick red fox: an app supporting a new paradigm in qualitative research on AIED for STEM. In: Ouyang, F., Jiao, P., McLaren, B.M., Alavi, A.H. (eds.) Artificial Intelligence in STEM Education: The Paradigmatic Shifts in Research, Education, and Technology (In press)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ocumpaugh, J., et al.: Using qualitative data from targeted interviews to inform rapid AIED development. In: Rodrigo, M.M.T., Iyer, S., and Mitrovic, A. (eds.) 29th International Conference on Computers in Education Conference, ICCE 2021 – Proceedings. pp. 69–74 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hutt, S., et al.: Who’s stopping you? – using microanalysis to explore the impact of science anxiety on self-regulated learning operations. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, vol. 43 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mahmood, S., Khatoon, T.: Development and validation of the mathematics anxiety scale for secondary and senior secondary school students. Br. J. Sociol. 2, 170–179 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  20. McCullagh, P.: Regression models for ordinal data. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Stat. Methodol. 42, 109–142 (1980)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Ryan, A.M., Shim, S.S., Lampkins-uThando, S.A., Kiefer, S.M., Thompson, G.N.: Do gender differences in help avoidance vary by ethnicity? An examination of African American and European American students during early adolescence. Dev. Psychol. 45, 1152 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Calarco, J.M.: “I need help!” social class and children’s help-seeking in elementary school. Am. Soc. Rev. 76, 862–882 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122411427177

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by NSF #DRL-1561567. Elena G. van Stee was supported by a fellowship from the Institute of Education Sciences under Award #3505B200035 to the University of Pennsylvania during her work on this project. Taylor Heath was supported by a NIH T32 Grant under award #5T32HD007242-40. The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not represent views of the funding agencies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elena G. van Stee .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

van Stee, E.G., Heath, T., Baker, R.S., Andres, J.M.A.L., Ocumpaugh, J. (2023). Help Seekers vs. Help Accepters: Understanding Student Engagement with a Mentor Agent. In: Wang, N., Rebolledo-Mendez, G., Matsuda, N., Santos, O.C., Dimitrova, V. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13916. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36272-9_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36272-9_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-36271-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-36272-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics