Skip to main content

The Road Not Taken: Preempting Dropout in MOOCs

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED 2023)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 13916))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 3073 Accesses

Abstract

Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) are often plagued by a low level of student engagement and retention, with many students dropping out before completing the course. In an effort to improve student retention, educational researchers are increasingly turning to the latest Machine Learning (ML) models to predict student learning outcomes, based on which instructors can provide timely support to at-risk students as the progression of a course. Though achieving a high prediction accuracy, these models are often “black-box” models, making it difficult to gain instructional insights from their results, and accordingly, designing meaningful and actionable interventions remains to be challenging in the context of MOOCs. To tackle this problem, we present an innovative approach based on Hidden Markov Model (HMM). We devoted our efforts to model students’ temporal interaction patterns in MOOCs in a transparent and interpretable manner, with the aim of empowering instructors to gain insights about actionable interventions in students’ next-step learning activities. Through extensive evaluation on two large-scale MOOC datasets, we demonstrated that, by gaining a temporally grounded understanding of students’ learning processes using HMM, both the students’ current engagement state and potential future state transitions could be learned, and based on which, an actionable next-step intervention tailored to the student current engagement state could be formulated to recommend to students. These findings have strong implications for real-world adoption of HMM for promoting student engagement and preempting dropouts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://pypi.org/project/bayesian-hmm/.

  2. 2.

    https://github.com/marcotcr/lime.

  3. 3.

    https://github.com/lsha49/hmm-engagement.

  4. 4.

    https://docs.google.com/document/d/1hntPaZ1NfSJF4t2I9x83CKtAt4C0jRB9Ma8OfdYj2_Q/edit?usp=sharing.

References

  1. Coleman, C.A., Seaton, D.T., Chuang, I.: Probabilistic use cases: discovering behavioral patterns for predicting certification. In: Proceedings of the Second ACM Conference on Learning@ Scale, pp. 141–148 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Deng, R., Benckendorff, P., Gannaway, D.: Learner engagement in MOOCs: scale development and validation. Br. J. Edu. Technol. 51(1), 245–262 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fei, M., Yeung, D.Y.: Temporal models for predicting student dropout in massive open online courses. In: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshop (ICDMW), pp. 256–263. IEEE (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fincham, E., Gašević, D., Jovanović, J., Pardo, A.: From study tactics to learning strategies: an analytical method for extracting interpretable representations. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. 12(1), 59–72 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fox, E.B., Sudderth, E.B., Jordan, M.I., Willsky, A.S.: An HDP-HMM for systems with state persistence. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 312–319 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fox, E.B., Sudderth, E.B., Jordan, M.I., Willsky, A.S.: A sticky HDP-HMM with application to speaker diarization. Ann. Appl. Stat. 1020–1056 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gardner, J., Yang, Y., Baker, R.S., Brooks, C.: Modeling and experimental design for MOOC dropout prediction: a replication perspective. Int. Educ. Data Min. Soc. (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hershcovits, H., Vilenchik, D., Gal, K.: Modeling engagement in self-directed learning systems using principal component analysis. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. 13(1), 164–171 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jiang, S., Williams, A., Schenke, K., Warschauer, M., O’dowd, D.: Predicting MOOC performance with week 1 behavior. In: Educational Data Mining 2014 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Joksimović, S., et al.: How do we model learning at scale? A systematic review of research on MOOCs. Rev. Educ. Res. 88(1), 43–86 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jovanović, J., Gašević, D., Dawson, S., Pardo, A., Mirriahi, N., et al.: Learning analytics to unveil learning strategies in a flipped classroom. Internet High. Educ. 33(4), 74–85 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kizilcec, R.F., Piech, C., Schneider, E.: Deconstructing disengagement: analyzing learner subpopulations in massive open online courses. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, pp. 170–179 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lin, J., Lang, D., Xie, H., Gašević, D., Chen, G.: Investigating the role of politeness in human-human online tutoring. In: Bittencourt, I.I., Cukurova, M., Muldner, K., Luckin, R., Millán, E. (eds.) AIED 2020. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 12164, pp. 174–179. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52240-7_32

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Lin, J., et al.: Is it a good move? Mining effective tutoring strategies from human-human tutorial dialogues. Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst. 127, 194–207 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mogavi, R.H., Ma, X., Hui, P.: Characterizing student engagement moods for dropout prediction in question pool websites. arXiv preprint: arXiv:2102.00423 (2021)

  16. Mu, T., Jetten, A., Brunskill, E.: Towards suggesting actionable interventions for wheel-spinning students. Int. Educ. Data Min. Soc. (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Prenkaj, B., Velardi, P., Stilo, G., Distante, D., Faralli, S.: A survey of machine learning approaches for student dropout prediction in online courses. ACM Comput. Surv. (CSUR) 53(3), 1–34 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Raković, M., et al.: Towards the automated evaluation of legal casenote essays. In: Rodrigo, M.M., Matsuda, N., Cristea, A.I., Dimitrova, V. (eds.) AIED 2022. LNCS, vol. 13355, pp. 167–179. Springer, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11644-5_14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Ribeiro, M.T., Singh, S., Guestrin, C.: “Why should I trust you?” explaining the predictions of any classifier. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 1135–1144 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Saqr, M., López-Pernas, S., Jovanović, J., Gašević, D.: Intense, turbulent, or wallowing in the mire: a longitudinal study of cross-course online tactics, strategies, and trajectories. Internet High. Educ. 100902 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sha, L., et al.: Assessing algorithmic fairness in automatic classifiers of educational forum posts. In: Roll, I., McNamara, D., Sosnovsky, S., Luckin, R., Dimitrova, V. (eds.) AIED 2021. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 12748, pp. 381–394. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78292-4_31

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Sinclair, J., Kalvala, S.: Student engagement in massive open online courses. Int. J. Learn. Technol. 11(3), 218–237 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Štrumbelj, E., Kononenko, I.: Explaining prediction models and individual predictions with feature contributions. Knowl. Inf. Syst. 41(3), 647–665 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Teh, Y., Jordan, M., Beal, M., Blei, D.: Sharing clusters among related groups: hierarchical Dirichlet processes. In: NeurIPS, vol. 17 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Zhou, Y., Huang, C., Hu, Q., Zhu, J., Tang, Y.: Personalized learning full-path recommendation model based on LSTM neural networks. Inf. Sci. 444, 135–152 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Lele Sha or Guanliang Chen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sha, L. et al. (2023). The Road Not Taken: Preempting Dropout in MOOCs. In: Wang, N., Rebolledo-Mendez, G., Matsuda, N., Santos, O.C., Dimitrova, V. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13916. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36272-9_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36272-9_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-36271-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-36272-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics