Skip to main content

Can Virtual Agents Scale Up Mentoring?: Insights from College Students’ Experiences Using the CareerFair.ai Platform at an American Hispanic-Serving Institution

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED 2023)

Abstract

Mentoring promotes underserved students’ persistence in STEM but is difficult to scale up. Conversational virtual agents can help address this problem by conveying a mentor’s experiences to larger audiences. The present study examined college students’ \((N = 138)\) utilization of CareerFair.ai, an online platform featuring virtual agent-mentors that were self-recorded by sixteen real-life mentors and built using principles from the earlier MentorPal framework. Participants completed a single-session study which included 30 min of active interaction with CareerFair.ai, sandwiched between pre-test and post-test surveys. Students’ user experience and learning gains were examined, both for the overall sample and with a lens of diversity and equity across different, potentially underserved demographic groups. Findings included positive pre/post changes in intent to pursue STEM coursework and high user acceptance ratings (e.g., expected benefit, ease of use), with under-represented minority (URM) students giving significantly higher ratings on average than non-URM students. Self-reported learning gains of interest, actual content viewed on the CareerFair.ai platform, and actual learning gains were associated with one another, suggesting that the platform may be a useful resource in meeting a wide range of career exploration needs. Overall, the CareerFair.ai platform shows promise in scaling up aspects of mentoring to serve the needs of diverse groups of college students.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Appianing, J., Van Eck, R.N.: Development and validation of the value-expectancy stem assessment scale for students in higher education. Int. J. STEM Educ. 5(24) (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chelberg, K.L., Bosman, L.B.: The role of faculty mentoring in improving retention and completion rates for historically underrepresented STEM students. Int. J. High. Educ. 8(2), 39–48 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chemers, M.M., Zurbriggen, E.L., Syed, M., Goza, B.K., Bearman, S.: The role of efficacy and identity in science career commitment among underrepresented minority students. J. Soc. Issues 67(3), 469–491 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dawson, A.E., Bernstein, B.L., Bekki, J.M.: Providing the psychosocial benefits of mentoring to women in STEM: careerwise as an online solution. N. Dir. High. Educ. 2015(171), 53–62 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Domingo, C.R., et al.: More service or more advancement: institutional barriers to academic success for women and women of color faculty at a large public comprehensive minority-serving state university. J. Divers. High. Educ. 15(3), 365–379 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fealing, K.H., Lai, Y., Myers, S.L., Jr.: Pathways vs. pipelines to broadening participation in the STEM workforce. J. Women Minorities Sci. Eng. 21(4), 271–293 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mack, N.A., Cummings, R., Huff, E.W., Gosha, K., Gilbert, J.E.: Exploring the needs and preferences of underrepresented minority students for an intelligent virtual mentoring system. In: Stephanidis, C., Antona, M. (eds.) HCII 2019. CCIS, vol. 1088, pp. 213–221. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30712-7_28

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Martin-Hansen, L.: Examining ways to meaningfully support students in STEM. Int. J. STEM Educ. 5(1), 1–6 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. McQuiggan, S.W., Rowe, J.P., Lee, S., Lester, J.C.: Story-based learning: the impact of narrative on learning experiences and outcomes. In: Woolf, B.P., Aïmeur, E., Nkambou, R., Lajoie, S. (eds.) ITS 2008. LNCS, vol. 5091, pp. 530–539. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69132-7_56

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Neely, A.R., Cotton, J., Neely, A.D.: E-mentoring: a model and review of the literature. AIS Trans. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 9(3), 220–242 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Nye, B., Swartout, W., Campbell, J., Krishnamachari, M., Kaimakis, N., Davis, D.: Mentorpal: Interactive virtual mentors based on real-life STEM professionals. In: Interservice/Industry Simulation, Training and Education Conference (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nye, B.D., et al.: Feasibility and usability of mentorpal, a framework for rapid development of virtual mentors. J. Res. Technol. Educ. 53(1), 1–23 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Okado, Y., Nye, B.D., Swartout, W.: Student acceptance of virtual agents for career-oriented mentoring: a pilot study for the careerfair.ai project. In: American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Reimers, N., Gurevych, I.: Sentence-BERT: sentence embeddings using Siamese BERT-networks. In: 9th EMNLP-IJCNLP Conference, pp. 3982–3992 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Saldana, J.: Fundamentals of Qualitative Research. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Swartout, W., et al.: Virtual humans for learning. AI Mag. 34(4), 13–30 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Traum, D., et al.: New dimensions in testimony: digitally preserving a holocaust survivor’s interactive storytelling. In: Schoenau-Fog, H., Bruni, L.E., Louchart, S., Baceviciute, S. (eds.) ICIDS 2015. LNCS, vol. 9445, pp. 269–281. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27036-4_26

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., Davis, F.D.: User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 425–478 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This material is based upon work supported by the National Defense Education Program (NDEP) for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education, Outreach, and Workforce Initiative Programs under Grant No. HQ0034-20-S-FO01. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the official policies of the Department of Defense nor does mention of trade names, commercial practices, or organizations imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. We thank the CareerFair.ai project mentors, research assistants, and study participants.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuko Okado .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Okado, Y., Nye, B.D., Aguirre, A., Swartout, W. (2023). Can Virtual Agents Scale Up Mentoring?: Insights from College Students’ Experiences Using the CareerFair.ai Platform at an American Hispanic-Serving Institution. In: Wang, N., Rebolledo-Mendez, G., Matsuda, N., Santos, O.C., Dimitrova, V. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13916. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36272-9_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36272-9_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-36271-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-36272-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics