Skip to main content

Confusion, Conflict, Consensus: Modeling Dialogue Processes During Collaborative Learning with Hidden Markov Models

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED 2023)

Abstract

There is growing recognition that AI technologies can, and should, support collaborative learning. To provide this support, we need models of collaborative talk that reflect the ways in which learners interact. Great progress has been made in modeling dialogue for high school and college-age learners, but the dialogue processes that characterize collaborative talk between elementary learner dyads are not currently well understood. This paper reports on a study with elementary school learners (4th and 5th grade, ages 9–11 years old) coded collaboratively in dyads. We recorded dialogue from 22 elementary school learner dyads, covering 7594 total utterances. We labeled this corpus manually with dialogue acts and then induced a hidden Markov model to identify the underlying dialogue states and the transitions between these states. The model identified six distinct hidden states which we interpret as Social Dialogue, Confusion, Frustrated Coordination, Exploratory Talk, Directive & Disagreement, and Disagreement & Self-Explanation. The HMM revealed that when students entered into a productive exploratory talk state, the primary way they transitioned out of this state is when they became confused or reached an impasse. When this occurred, the learners then moved into states of disputation and conflict before re-entering the Exploratory Talk state. These findings can inform the design of AI agents who support young learners’ collaborative talk and help agents determine when students are conflicting rather than collaborating.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    While the agents were not designed to elicit verbal responses from the learners and could not listen or respond, some learners spoke to them nonetheless.

References

  1. Barnes, D.: Exploring Talk in School: Inspired by the Work of Douglas Barnes. SAGE Publications Ltd, New York (2008). https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446279526

  2. Craig, S., Graesser, A., Sullins, J., Gholson, B.: Affect and learning: an exploratory look into the role of affect in learning with AutoTutor. J. Educ. Media 29, 241–250 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1080/1358165042000283101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. D’Mello, S.K., Lehman, B., Person, N.: Monitoring affect states during effortful problem solving activities. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 20(4), 361–389 (2010). https://doi.org/10.3233/JAI-2010-012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. D’Mello, S., Graesser, A.: Dynamics of affective states during complex learning. Learn. Instr. 22(2), 145–157 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.10.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Graesser, A.C., Olde, B.A.: How does one know whether a person understands a device? the quality of the questions the person asks when the device breaks down. J. Educ. Psychol. 95, 524–536 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.3.524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Griffith, A.E., et al.: Discovering co-creative dialogue states during collaborative learning. In: Roll, I., McNamara, D., Sosnovsky, S., Luckin, R., Dimitrova, V. (eds.) AIED 2021. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 12748, pp. 165–177. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78292-4_14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Light, P., Littleton, K. (eds.): Learning with Computers: Analysing Productive Interactions. Routledge, Milton Park (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ma, Y., Wiggins, J.B., Celepkolu, M., Boyer, K.E., Lynch, C., Wiebe, E.: The challenge of noisy classrooms: Speaker detection during elementary students’ collaborative dialogue. In: Roll, I., McNamara, D., Sosnovsky, S., Luckin, R., Dimitrova, V. (eds.) AIED 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 12748, pp. 268–281. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, Cham (2021)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Madaio, M., Peng, K., Ogan, A., Cassell, J.: A climate of support: a process-oriented analysis of the impact of rapport on peer tutoring. In: Rethinking Learning in the Digital Age: Making the Learning Sciences Count, 13th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) 2018. International Society of the Learning Sciences (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  10. McQuiggan, S.W., Robison, J.L., Lester, J.C.: Affective transitions in narrative-centered learning environments. J. Educ. Technol. Soc. 13(1), 40–53 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mercer, N.: The Guided Construction of Knowledge: Talk amongst Teachers and Learners, p. viii, 135. Multilingual Matters (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mercer, N.: Words and Minds: How We Use Language to Think Together. Routledge, Milton Park (2000). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203464984

  13. Mercer, N., Howe, C.: Explaining the dialogic processes of teaching and learning: the value and potential of sociocultural theory. Learn. Cult. Soc. Interact. 1(1), 12–21 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2012.03.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mercer, N., Wegerif, R.: Is ‘exploratory talk’ productive talk? In: Learning with Computers: Analysing Productive Interaction, p. 23. Routledge, Milton Park (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Misra, A., Loukina, A., Beigman Klebanov, B., Gyawali, B., Zechner, K.: A good start is half the battle won: unsupervised pre-training for low resource children’s speech recognition for an interactive reading companion. In: Roll, I., McNamara, D., Sosnovsky, S., Luckin, R., Dimitrova, V. (eds.) Artificial Intelligence in Education. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 306–317. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78292-4_25

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Morales-Urrutia, E.K., Ocaña Ch., J.M., Pérez-Marín, D., Pizarro-Romero, C.: Promoting learning and satisfaction of children when interacting with an emotional companion to program. In: Bittencourt, I.I., Cukurova, M., Muldner, K., Luckin, R., Millán, E. (eds.) Artificial Intelligence in Education, vol. 12164, pp. 220–223. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52240-7_40

  17. Nystrand, M., Wu, L.L., Gamoran, A., Zeiser, S., Long, D.A.: Questions in time: Investigating the structure and dynamics of unfolding classroom discourse. Discourse Process. 35(2), 135–198 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326950DP3502_3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Piaget, J.: Part i: cognitive development in children: Piaget development and learning. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 2(3), 176–186 (1964). https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660020306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rabiner, L., Juang, B.: An introduction to hidden Markov models. IEEE ASSP Mag. 3(1), 4–16 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rodríguez, F.J., Boyer, K.E.: Discovering individual and collaborative problem-solving modes with hidden Markov models. In: Conati, C., Heffernan, N., Mitrovic, A., Verdejo, M.F. (eds.) AIED 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 408–418. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19773-9_41

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Sun, S.: Meta-analysis of Cohen’s Kappa. Health Serv. Outcomes Res. Methodol. 11, 145–163 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10742-011-0077-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tiam-Lee, T.J., Sumi, K.: Adaptive feedback based on student emotion in a system for programming practice. In: Nkambou, R., Azevedo, R., Vassileva, J. (eds.) Intelligent Tutoring Systems, vol. 10858, pp. 243–255. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91464-0_24

  23. VanLehn, K., Siler, S., Murray, C., Yamauchi, T., Baggett, W.B.: Why do only some events cause learning during human tutoring? Cogn. Instr. 21(3), 209–249 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532690XCI2103_01

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Williams, L., Wiebe, E., Yang, K., Ferzli, M., Miller, C.: In support of pair programming in the introductory computer science course. Comput. Sci. Educ. 12(3), 197–212 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1076/csed.12.3.197.8618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zakaria, Z., et al.: Two-computer pair programming: exploring a feedback intervention to improve collaborative talk in elementary students. Comput. Sci. Educ. 32(1), 3–29 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2021.1877987

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the National Science Foundation through grant DRL-1721160. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the National Science Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Toni V. Earle-Randell .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Earle-Randell, T.V. et al. (2023). Confusion, Conflict, Consensus: Modeling Dialogue Processes During Collaborative Learning with Hidden Markov Models. In: Wang, N., Rebolledo-Mendez, G., Matsuda, N., Santos, O.C., Dimitrova, V. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13916. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36272-9_50

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36272-9_50

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-36271-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-36272-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics