Skip to main content

Abstract

In the proposed research, we investigated whether the standardized neuropsychological tests commonly used to assess attention can be used to measure students’ engagement in online learning settings. Accordingly, we employed 73 students in three clinically relevant neuropsychological tests to assess three types of attention. Students’ engagement performance, as evidenced by their facial video, was also annotated by three independent annotators. The manual annotations observed a high level of inter-annotator reliability (Krippendorffs’ Alpha of 0.864). Further, by obtaining a correlation value of 0.673 (Spearmans’ Rank Correlation) between manual annotation and neuropsychological tests score, our results show construct validity to prove neuropsychological test scores’ significance as a latent variable for measuring students’ engagement. Finally, using non-intrusive behavioral cues, including facial action unit and eye gaze data collected via webcam, we propose a machine learning method for engagement analysis in online learning settings, achieving a low mean squared error value (0.022). The findings suggest a neuropsychological test-based machine learning technique could effectively assess students’ engagement in online education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Amos, B., Ludwiczuk, B., Satyanarayanan, M.: Openface: A general-purpose face recognition library with mobile applications. Tech. Rep. CMU-CS-16-118, CMU School of Computer Science (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  2. De Leeuw, J.: Jspsych: a javascript library for creating behavioral experiments in a web browser. Behav. Res. Methods 47, 1–12 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ghassemi, F., Moradi, M.H., Doust, M.T., Abootalebi, V.: Classification of sustained attention level based on morphological features of eeg’s independent components. In: 2009 ICME International Conference on Complex Medical Engineering (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Goldberg, P., et al.: Attentive or not? toward a machine learning approach to assessing students’ visible engagement in classroom instruction. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 33, 27–49 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hutt, S., Krasich, K., R. Brockmole, J., K. D’Mello, S.: Breaking out of the lab: Mitigating mind wandering with gaze-based attention-aware technology in classrooms. In: Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–14 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ko, L.W., Komarov, O., Hairston, W.D., Jung, T.P., Lin, C.T.: Sustained attention in real classroom settings: an eeg study. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 11, 388 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lackmann, S., Léger, P.M., Charland, P., Aubé, C., Talbot, J.: The influence of video format on engagement and performance in online learning. Brain Sci. 11(2), 128 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lai, Y.J., Chang, K.M.: Improvement of attention in elementary school students through fixation focus training activity. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 17(13), 4780 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Linson, A., Xu, Y., English, A.R., Fisher, R.B.: Identifying student struggle by analyzing facial movement during asynchronous video lecture viewing: Towards an automated tool to support instructors. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 53–65 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Renninger, K.A., Bachrach, J.E.: Studying triggers for interest and engagement using observational methods. Educ. Psychol. 50, 58–69 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sohlberg, M.K.M., Mateer, C.A.: Improving attention and managing attentional problems. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 931, 359–375 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Stevens, C., Bavelier, D.: The role of selective attention on academic foundations: a cognitive neuroscience perspective. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 2, S30–S48 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Szafir, D., Mutlu, B.: Pay attention! In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Whitehill, J., Serpell, Z., Lin, Y.C., Foster, A., Movellan, J.R.: The faces of engagement: automatic recognition of student engagement from facial expressions. IEEE Trans. Affect. Comput. 5, 86–98 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wright, B.C.: What stroop tasks can tell us about selective attention from childhood to adulthood. Br. J. Psychol. 108(3), 583–607 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zagermann, J., Pfeil, U., Reiterer, H.: Studying eye movements as a basis for measuring cognitive load. In: Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference On Human Factors In Computing Systems, pp. 1–6 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research work is funded by a research grant (Ref. ID.: IHUB Anubhuti/Project Grant/03) of IHUB Anubhuti-IIITD Foundation and is partly supported by the Infosys Center for AI and the Center for Design and New Media (A TCS Foundation Initiative supported by Tata Consultancy Services) at IIIT-Delhi, India.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saumya Yadav .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Yadav, S., Siddiqui, M.N., Shukla, J. (2023). EngageMe: Assessing Student Engagement in Online Learning Environment Using Neuropsychological Tests. In: Wang, N., Rebolledo-Mendez, G., Dimitrova, V., Matsuda, N., Santos, O.C. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education. Posters and Late Breaking Results, Workshops and Tutorials, Industry and Innovation Tracks, Practitioners, Doctoral Consortium and Blue Sky. AIED 2023. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1831. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36336-8_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36336-8_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-36335-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-36336-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics