Skip to main content

Abstract

Interactive simulations encourage students to practice skills essential to understanding and learning sciences. Alas, inquiry learning with interactive simulations is challenging. In this paper, we seek to identify inquiry patterns across topics and evaluate their stability with regard to common behaviors and student membership. Applying a clustering approach, we propose an encoding through which we can model students’ strategies in diverse environments. Specifically, we encode each sequence with three different levels of granularity which range from simulation-specific characteristics to simulation-agnostic features. Using this generalizable encoding, we find two clusters for each of two simulations. The formed groups exhibit similar learning patterns across environments. One systematically cycles through exploring and recording systematically over all variables. The other group explores the simulation more freely. This suggests that our feature encoding captures inherent quality of inquiry with simulations and can be used to characterize learners knowledge of productive exploration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://phet.colorado.edu/sims/html/beers-law-lab/latest/beers-law-lab_en.html.

  2. 2.

    https://phet.colorado.edu/sims/html/capacitor-lab-basics/latest/capacitor-lab-basics_en.html.

References

  1. Alfieri, L., Brooks, P.J., Aldrich, N.J., Tenenbaum, H.R.: Does discovery-based instruction enhance learning? J. Educ. Psychol. 103(1), 1 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cock, J., Marras, M., Giang, C., Käser, T.: Early prediction of conceptual understanding in interactive simulations. In: International Educational Data Mining Society (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Conati, C., Fratamico, L., Kardan, S., Roll, I.: Comparing representations for learner models in interactive simulations. In: Conati, C., Heffernan, N., Mitrovic, A., Verdejo, M.F. (eds.) AIED 2015. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 9112, pp. 74–83. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19773-9_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Fratamico, L., Conati, C., Kardan, S., Roll, I.: Applying a framework for student modeling in exploratory learning environments: Comparing data representation granularity to handle environment complexity. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 27, 320–352 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Funke, J.: Analysis of minimal complex systems and complex problem solving require different forms of causal cognition (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kirschner, P., Sweller, J., Clark, R.E.: Why unguided learning does not work: an analysis of the failure of discovery learning, problem-based learning, experiential learning and inquiry-based learning. Educ. Psychol. 41(2), 75–86 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Klingler, S., Käser, T., Solenthaler, B., Gross, M.: Temporally coherent clustering of student data. In: International Educational Data Mining Society (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mayer, R.E.: Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? Am. Psychol. 59(1), 14 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Perez, S., et al.: Control of variables strategy across phases of inquiry in virtual labs. In: Penstein Rosé, C. (ed.) AIED 2018. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10948, pp. 271–275. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93846-2_50

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Perkins, K., Moore, E., Podolefsky, N., Lancaster, K., Denison, C.: Towards research-based strategies for using PhET simulations in middle school physical science classes. In: AIP Conference Proceedings. vol. 1413, pp. 295–298. American Institute of Physics (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sao Pedro, M.A., De Baker, R.S., Gobert, J.D., Montalvo, O., Nakama, A.: Leveraging machine-learned detectors of systematic inquiry behavior to estimate and predict transfer of inquiry skill. User Model. User-Adap. Inter. 23, 1–39 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tschirgi, J.E.: Sensible reasoning: a hypothesis about hypotheses. Child Dev. 51(1), 1–10 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wang, K.D., Cock, J.M., Käser, T., Bumbacher, E.: A systematic review of empirical studies using log data from open-ended learning environments to measure science and engineering practices. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 54(1), 192–221 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wieman, C.E., Adams, W.K., Loeblein, P., Perkins, K.K.: Teaching physics using PhET simulations. Phys. Teach. 48(4), 225–227 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jade Mai Cock .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Cock, J.M., Roll, I., Käser, T. (2023). Consistency of Inquiry Strategies Across Subsequent Activities in Different Domains. In: Wang, N., Rebolledo-Mendez, G., Dimitrova, V., Matsuda, N., Santos, O.C. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education. Posters and Late Breaking Results, Workshops and Tutorials, Industry and Innovation Tracks, Practitioners, Doctoral Consortium and Blue Sky. AIED 2023. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1831. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36336-8_34

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36336-8_34

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-36335-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-36336-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics