Skip to main content

Abstract

Recent advances in generative artificial intelligence (AI) have captured worldwide attention. Tools such as Dalle-2 and ChatGPT demonstrate that tasks previously thought to be beyond the capabilities of AI may now augment the productivity of creative media in various new ways. To date, there is limited research investigating the real-world educational value of AI-generated media. To address this gap, we examined the impact of using generative AI to create learning videos with synthetic virtual instructors. We took a mixed-method approach, randomly assigning adult learners (n  =  83) into one of two micro-learning conditions, collecting pre- and post-learning assessments, and surveying participants on their learning experience. The control condition included a traditionally produced instructor video, while the experimental condition included an AI-generated learning video with a synthetic virtual instructor. Learners in both conditions demonstrated significant improvement from pre- to post-learning (p <.001), with no significant differences in gains between the two conditions (p  =  .80), and no qualitative differences in the perceived learning experience. These findings suggest that AI-generated learning videos have the potential to be a viable substitute for videos produced via traditional methods in online educational settings, making high quality educational content more accessible across the globe.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. VanLehn, K., Banerjee, C., Milner, F., Wetzel, J.: Teaching algebraic model construction: a tutoring system, lessons learned and an evaluation. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 30(3), 459–480 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-020-00205-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Azevedo, R., Cromley, J.G., Seibert, D.: Does adaptive scaffolding facilitate students’ ability to regulate their learning with hypermedia? Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 29(3), 344–370 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2003.09.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., Forcier, L.B.: Intelligence Unleashed: An argument for AI in Education. Pearson Education, London (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Karras, T., Laine, S., Aittala, M., Hellsten, J., Lehtinen, J., Aila, T.: Analyzing and improving the image quality of StyleGAN. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 8110–8119 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.00813

  5. Zhang, Y., et al.: Learning to speak fluently in a foreign language: multilingual speech synthesis and cross-language voice cloning. In: Proceedings of the Interspeech, pp. 2080–2084 (2019).https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2019-2668

  6. Mirsky, Y., Lee, W.: The creation and detection of deepfakes: a survey. ACM Comput. Surv. 54, 1–41 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1145/3425780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Whittaker, L., Letheren, K., Mulcahy, R.: The rise of deepfakes: a conceptual framework and research agenda for marketing. Australas. Mark. J. 29(3), 204–214 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1177/1839334921999479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Schroeder, N.L., Adesope, O.O., Gilbert, R.B.: How effective are pedagogical agents for learning? A meta-analytic review. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 49(1), 1–39 (2013). https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.49.1.a

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang, F.X., Li, W.J., Mayer, R.E., Liu, H.S.: Animated pedagogical agents as aids in multimedia learning: effects on eye fixations during learning and learning outcomes. J. Educ. Psychol. 110, 250–268 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hudson, I., Hurter, J.: Avatar types matter: review of avatar literature for performance purposes. In: Lackey, S., Shumaker, R. (eds.) VAMR 2016. LNCS, vol. 9740, pp. 14–21. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39907-2_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Mabanza, N., de Wet, L.: Determining the usability effect of pedagogical interface agents on adult computer literacy training. In: Ivanović, M., Jain, L.C. (eds.) E-Learning Paradigms and Applications. SCI, vol. 528, pp. 145–183. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41965-2_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Mayer, R.E.: Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. Cambridge Handb. Multimedia Learn. 41, 31–48 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511816819.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Clark, R.C., Mayer, R.E.: E-learning and the Science of Instruction: Proven Guidelines for Consumers and Designers of Multimedia Learning. John Wiley & Sons, New York (2016).https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119239086

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Leiker .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Leiker, D., Gyllen, A.R., Eldesouky, I., Cukurova, M. (2023). Generative AI for Learning: Investigating the Potential of Learning Videos with Synthetic Virtual Instructors. In: Wang, N., Rebolledo-Mendez, G., Dimitrova, V., Matsuda, N., Santos, O.C. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education. Posters and Late Breaking Results, Workshops and Tutorials, Industry and Innovation Tracks, Practitioners, Doctoral Consortium and Blue Sky. AIED 2023. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1831. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36336-8_81

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36336-8_81

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-36335-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-36336-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics