Abstract
This research proposes a novel methodology to address the challenge of identifying learner deficiencies from multiple choice questions (MCQs). The proposed approach involves manipulating the standard MCQ into a modified MCQ by generating distractors based on three different aspects: ‘Fact’, ‘Process’, and ‘Accuracy’. ‘Fact’ refers to the fundamental information related to the answer of the question, ‘Process’ refers to the concepts and application methods required to solve the problem, and ‘Accuracy’ refers to the degree of closeness of the answer to its true value. To achieve this, a Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT) model was used to develop a system called ‘Q-GENius’, that can take a question stem and some other optional additional information as input, and generate a modified MCQ with key and three distractors, each having a deficiency either in the ‘Fact,’ ‘Process,’ or ‘Accuracy’ aspect of the answer. The study was validated using inter-annotator agreement of subject matter experts on the accuracy and reproducibility of the model. The validation was performed on four different subjects. The results demonstrated that the proposed approach of modified MCQ was effective in identifying learner deficiencies when compared to standard MCQs. Overall, the proposed methodology has the potential to improve the accuracy of identifying learner deficiencies in MCQs.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
https://platform.openai.com/docs/models/gpt-3-5. Last accessed 5 March 2023.
- 2.
https://platform.openai.com/docs/models/gpt-3. Last accessed 5 March 2023.
References
Bridgeman, B., Rock, D.A.: Relationships among multiple- choice and open-ended analytical questions. J. Educ. Meas. 30(4), 313–329 (1993)
Shakurnia, A., Ghafourian, M., Khodadadi, A., Ghadiri, A., Amari, A., Shariffat, M.: Evaluating functional and non-functional distractors and their relationship with difficulty and discrimination indices in four-option multiple-choice questions. Educ. Med. J. 14(4), 1–8 (2022)
Radford, A., Narasimhan, K., Salimans, T., Sutskever, I.: Improving language understanding by generative pre-training (2018)
Schuwirth, L.W., Van Der Vleuten, C.P.: Different written assessment methods: what can be said about their strengths and weaknesses? Med. Educ. 38(9), 974–979 (2004)
Palmer, E.J., Devitt, P.G.: Assessment of higher order cognitive skills in undergraduate education: modified essay or multiple choice questions? research paper. BMC Med. Educ. 7(1), 1–7 (2007)
Guo, R., Palmer-Brown, D., Lee, S.W., Cai, F.F.: Intelligent diagnostic feedback for online multiple-choice questions. Artif. Intell. Rev. 42, 369–383 (2014)
Alsubait, T., Parsia, B., Sattler, U.: Ontology-based multiple choice question generation. KI-Künstliche Intelligenz 30, 183–188 (2016)
Ch, D.R., Saha, S.K.: Automatic multiple choice question generation from text: a survey. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. 13(1), 14–25 (2018)
Rodriguez-Torrealba, R., Garcia-Lopez, E., Garcia-Cabot, A.: End-to-end generation of multiple-choice questions using text-to-text transfer transformer models. Expert Syst. Appl. 208, 118258 (2022)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Prakash, V., Agrawal, K., Das, S. (2023). Q-GENius: A GPT Based Modified MCQ Generator for Identifying Learner Deficiency. In: Wang, N., Rebolledo-Mendez, G., Dimitrova, V., Matsuda, N., Santos, O.C. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education. Posters and Late Breaking Results, Workshops and Tutorials, Industry and Innovation Tracks, Practitioners, Doctoral Consortium and Blue Sky. AIED 2023. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1831. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36336-8_98
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36336-8_98
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-36335-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-36336-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)