Skip to main content

Abstract

This research proposes a novel methodology to address the challenge of identifying learner deficiencies from multiple choice questions (MCQs). The proposed approach involves manipulating the standard MCQ into a modified MCQ by generating distractors based on three different aspects: ‘Fact’, ‘Process’, and ‘Accuracy’. ‘Fact’ refers to the fundamental information related to the answer of the question, ‘Process’ refers to the concepts and application methods required to solve the problem, and ‘Accuracy’ refers to the degree of closeness of the answer to its true value. To achieve this, a Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT) model was used to develop a system called ‘Q-GENius’, that can take a question stem and some other optional additional information as input, and generate a modified MCQ with key and three distractors, each having a deficiency either in the ‘Fact,’ ‘Process,’ or ‘Accuracy’ aspect of the answer. The study was validated using inter-annotator agreement of subject matter experts on the accuracy and reproducibility of the model. The validation was performed on four different subjects. The results demonstrated that the proposed approach of modified MCQ was effective in identifying learner deficiencies when compared to standard MCQs. Overall, the proposed methodology has the potential to improve the accuracy of identifying learner deficiencies in MCQs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://platform.openai.com/docs/models/gpt-3-5. Last accessed 5 March 2023.

  2. 2.

    https://platform.openai.com/docs/models/gpt-3. Last accessed 5 March 2023.

References

  1. Bridgeman, B., Rock, D.A.: Relationships among multiple- choice and open-ended analytical questions. J. Educ. Meas. 30(4), 313–329 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Shakurnia, A., Ghafourian, M., Khodadadi, A., Ghadiri, A., Amari, A., Shariffat, M.: Evaluating functional and non-functional distractors and their relationship with difficulty and discrimination indices in four-option multiple-choice questions. Educ. Med. J. 14(4), 1–8 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Radford, A., Narasimhan, K., Salimans, T., Sutskever, I.: Improving language understanding by generative pre-training (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Schuwirth, L.W., Van Der Vleuten, C.P.: Different written assessment methods: what can be said about their strengths and weaknesses? Med. Educ. 38(9), 974–979 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Palmer, E.J., Devitt, P.G.: Assessment of higher order cognitive skills in undergraduate education: modified essay or multiple choice questions? research paper. BMC Med. Educ. 7(1), 1–7 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Guo, R., Palmer-Brown, D., Lee, S.W., Cai, F.F.: Intelligent diagnostic feedback for online multiple-choice questions. Artif. Intell. Rev. 42, 369–383 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Alsubait, T., Parsia, B., Sattler, U.: Ontology-based multiple choice question generation. KI-Künstliche Intelligenz 30, 183–188 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ch, D.R., Saha, S.K.: Automatic multiple choice question generation from text: a survey. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. 13(1), 14–25 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rodriguez-Torrealba, R., Garcia-Lopez, E., Garcia-Cabot, A.: End-to-end generation of multiple-choice questions using text-to-text transfer transformer models. Expert Syst. Appl. 208, 118258 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Syaamantak Das .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Prakash, V., Agrawal, K., Das, S. (2023). Q-GENius: A GPT Based Modified MCQ Generator for Identifying Learner Deficiency. In: Wang, N., Rebolledo-Mendez, G., Dimitrova, V., Matsuda, N., Santos, O.C. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education. Posters and Late Breaking Results, Workshops and Tutorials, Industry and Innovation Tracks, Practitioners, Doctoral Consortium and Blue Sky. AIED 2023. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1831. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36336-8_98

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36336-8_98

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-36335-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-36336-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics