Abstract
Usual derivation of many formulas of elementary mathematics—such as the formulas for solving quadratic equation—often leave un unfortunate impression that mathematics is a collection of unrelated unnatural tricks. In this paper, on the example of formulas for solving quadratic and cubic equations, we show that these derivations can be made much more natural if we take physical meaning into account.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Acknowledgements
This work was supported in part by the National Science Foundation grants:
\(\bullet \) 1623190 (A Model of Change for Preparing a New Generation for Professional Practice in Computer Science), and
\(\bullet \) HRD-1834620 and HRD-2034030 (CAHSI Includes).
It was also supported:
\(\bullet \) by the AT&T Fellowship in Information Technology, and
\(\bullet \) by the program of the development of the Scientific-Educational Mathematical Center of Volga Federal District No. 075-02-2020-1478.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Servin, C., Kosheleva, O., Kreinovich, V. (2023). Physical Meaning Often Leads to Natural Derivations in Elementary Mathematics: On the Examples of Solving Quadratic and Cubic Equations. In: Ceberio, M., Kreinovich, V. (eds) Uncertainty, Constraints, and Decision Making. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, vol 484. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36394-8_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36394-8_22
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-36393-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-36394-8
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)