Skip to main content

Towards Better Ways to Compute the Overall Grade for a Class

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Uncertainty, Constraints, and Decision Making

Part of the book series: Studies in Systems, Decision and Control ((SSDC,volume 484))

  • 264 Accesses

Abstract

Traditional way to compute the overall grade for the class is to use the weighted sum of the grades for all the assignments and exams, including the final exam. In terms of encouraging students to study hard throughout the semester, this grading scheme is better than an alternative scheme, in which all that matters is the grade on the final exam: in contrast to this alternative scheme, in the weighted-sum approach, students are penalized if they did not do well in the beginning of the semester. In practice, however, instructors sometimes deviate from the weighted-sum scheme: indeed, if the weighted sum is below the passing threshold, but a student shows good knowledge on the comprehensive final exam, it makes no sense to fail the student and make him/her waste time re-learning what this student already learned. So, in this case, instructors usually raise the weighted sum grade to the passing level and pass the student. This sounds reasonable, but this idea has a limitation similar to the limitation of the alternative scheme: namely, it does not encourage those students who were initially low-performing to do as well as possible on the final exam. Indeed, within this idea, a small increase in the student’s grade on the final exam will not change the overall grade for the class. In this paper, we provide a natural idea of how we can overcome this limitation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Reference

  1. O. Kosheleva, V. Kreinovich, C. Servin, Motivations do not decrease procrastination, so what can we do?, in Proceedings of the 11th International Scientific-Practical Conference “Mathematical Education in Schools and Universities” MATHEDU’2022, March 28-April, 2022 (Kazan, Russia, 2022), pp. 185–188

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by the National Science Foundation grants 1623190 (A Model of Change for Preparing a New Generation for Professional Practice in Computer Science), and HRD-1834620 and HRD-2034030 (CAHSI Includes), and by the AT&T Fellowship in Information Technology.

It was also supported by the program of the development of the Scientific-Educational Mathematical Center of Volga Federal District No. 075-02-2020-1478, and by a grant from the Hungarian National Research, Development and Innovation Office (NRDI).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vladik Kreinovich .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Servin, C., Kosheleva, O., Kreinovich, V. (2023). Towards Better Ways to Compute the Overall Grade for a Class. In: Ceberio, M., Kreinovich, V. (eds) Uncertainty, Constraints, and Decision Making. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, vol 484. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36394-8_23

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics