Abstract
It is known that self-esteem helps solve problems. From the algorithmic viewpoint, this seems like a mystery: a boost in self-esteem does not provide us with new algorithms, does not provide us with ability to compute faster—but somehow, with the same algorithmic tools and the same ability to perform the corresponding computations, students become better problem solvers. In this paper, we provide an algorithmic explanation for this surprising empirical phenomenon.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
R.F. Baumeister, J.D. Campbell, J.I. Krueger, K.D. Vohs, Does high self-esteem cause better performance, interpersonal success, happiness, or healthier lifestyles? Psychol. Sci. Public Interes. 4(1), 1–44 (2003)
M.J. Beeson, Foundations of Constructive Mathematics (Springer, N.Y., 1985)
E. Bishop, Foundations of Constructive Analysis (McGraw-Hill, 1967)
E. Bishop, D.S. Bridges, Constructive Analysis (Springer, N.Y., 1985)
M.Z. Booth, J.M. Gerard, Self-esteem and academic achievement: a comparative study of adolescent students in England and the United States. Comp.: J. Comp. Int. Educ. 41(5), 629–648 (2011)
D.S. Bridges, Constructive Functional Analysis (Pitman, London, 1979)
D.S. Bridges, S.L. Vita, Techniques of Constructive Analysis (Springer, New York, 2006)
A. Di Paula, J.D. Campbell, Self-esteem and persistence in the face of failure. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 83(3), 711–724 (2002)
B. Harris, Self-Esteem: 150 Ready-to-use Activities to Enhance the Self-Esteem of Children and Teenagers to Increase Student Success and Improve Behavior (CGS Communications, San Antonio, Texas, 2016)
U. Kohlenbach, Theorie der majorisierbaren und stetigen Funktionale und ihre Anwendung bei der Extraktion von Schranken aus inkonstruktiven Beweisen: Effektive Eindeutigkeitsmodule bei besten Approximationen aus ineffektiven Eindeutigkeitsbeweisen, Ph.D. Dissertation, Frankfurt am Main (1990)
U. Kohlenbach, Effective moduli from ineffective uniqueness proofs: an unwinding of de La Vallée Poussin’s proof for Chebycheff approximation. Ann. Pure Appl. Log. 64(1), 27–94 (1993)
U. Kohlenbach, Applied Proof Theory: Proof Interpretations and their Use in Mathematics (Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg, 2008)
V. Kreinovich, Uniqueness implies algorithmic computability, in Proceedings of the 4th Student Mathematical Conference (Leningrad University, Leningrad, 1975), pp. 19–21 (in Russian)
V. Kreinovich, Reviewer’s remarks in a review of D.S. Bridges, in Constructive Functional Analysis (Pitman, London, 1979); Zentralblatt für Mathematik, 401, 22–24 (1979)
V. Kreinovich, Categories of space-time models, Ph.D. Dissertation, Novosibirsk, Soviet Academy of Sciences, Siberian Branch, Institute of Mathematics (1979) (in Russian)
V. Kreinovich, Philosophy of Optimism: Notes on the Possibility of Using Algorithm Theory When Describing Historical Processes, Leningrad Center for New Information Technology “Informatika”, Technical Report, Leningrad (1989). ((in Russian))
V. Kreinovich, Physics-motivated ideas for extracting efficient bounds (and algorithms) from classical proofs: beyond local compactness, beyond uniqueness, in Abstracts of the Conference on the Methods of Proof Theory in Mathematics (Max-Planck Institut für Mathematik, Bonn, Germany, 3–10 June 2007), p. 8
V. Kreinovich, A. Lakeyev, J. Rohn, P. Kahl, Computational Complexity and Feasibility of Data Processing and Interval Computations (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1998)
V. Kreinovich, K. Villaverde, Extracting computable bounds (and algorithms) from classical existence proofs: girard domains enable us to go beyond local compactness. Int. J. Intell. Technol. Appl. Stat. (IJITAS) 12(2), 99–134 (2019)
B.A. Kushner, Lectures on Constructive Mathematical Analysis (American Mathematical Society, Providence, Rhode Island, 1984)
D. Lacombe, Les ensembles récursivement ouvert ou fermés, et leurs applications à l’analyse récurslve. Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sci. 245(13), 1040–1043 (1957)
V.A. Lifschitz, Investigation of constructive functions by the method of fillings. J. Sov. Math. 1, 41–47 (1973)
L. Longpré, O. Kosheleva, V. Kreinovich, Baudelaire’s ideas of vagueness and uniqueness in art: algorithm-based explanations, in Decision Making under Uncertainty and Constraints: A Why-Book, ed. by M. Ceberio, V. Kreinovich (Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 2022) (to appear)
L. Longpré, V. Kreinovich, W. Gasarch, G.W. Walster, \(m\) solutions good, \(m-1\) solutions better. Appl. Math. Sci. 2(5), 223–239 (2008)
C.W. Loo, J.L.F. Choy, Sources of self-efficacy influencing academic performance of engineering students. Am. J. Educ. Res. 1(3), 86–92 (2013)
H.W. Marsh, Causal ordering of academic self-concept and academic achievement: a multiwave, longitudinal path analysis. J. Educ. Psychol. 82(4), 646–656 (1990)
L. Noronha, M. Monteiro, N. Pinto, A study on the self-esteem and academic performance among the students. Int. J. Health Sci. Pharm. (IJHSP) 2(1), 1–7 (2018)
A. Ntem, Every student’s compass: a simple guide to help students deal with low self-esteem, set academic goals, choose the right career and make a difference in the society (2022)
M. Pour-El, J. Richards, Computability in Analysis and Physics (Springer, New York, 1989)
M. Rosenberg, C. Schooler, C. Schoenbach, F. Rosenberg, Global self-esteem and specific self-esteem: different concepts, different outcomes. Am. Sociol. Rev. 60(1), 141–156 (1995)
K. Weihrauch, Computable Analysis: An Introduction (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2000)
S.Y. Yoon, P.K. Imbrie, T. Reed, Development of the leadership self-efficacy scale for engineering students, in Proceedings of the 123rd Annual Conference and Exposition of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) (New Orleans, Louisiana, 26–29 June 2016) (Paper 15784)
Acknowledgements
This work was supported in part by the National Science Foundation grants 1623190 (A Model of Change for Preparing a New Generation for Professional Practice in Computer Science), and HRD-1834620 and HRD-2034030 (CAHSI Includes), and by the AT&T Fellowship in Information Technology.
It was also supported by the program of the development of the Scientific-Educational Mathematical Center of Volga Federal District No. 075-02-2020-1478, and by a grant from the Hungarian National Research, Development and Innovation Office (NRDI).
The authors are thankful to all the participants of the 27th Joint NMSU/UTEP Workshop on Mathematics, Computer Science, and Computational Sciences (Las Cruces, New Mexico, April 2, 2022) for valuable suggestions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix: What Is Computable: An Overview of the Main Definitions
Appendix: What Is Computable: An Overview of the Main Definitions
-
We say that a real number x is computable if there exists an algorithm that, given a natural number k, returns a rational number r which is \(2^{-k}\)-close to x:
$$|x-r|\le 2^{-k}.$$ -
We say that a tuple of real numbers \(x=(x_1,\ldots ,x_n)\) is computable if all the numbers \(x_i\) in this tuple are computable.
-
We say that a function f(x) from tuples of real numbers to real numbers is computable if there exists an algorithm that, given algorithms for computing \(x_i\) and a natural number k, returns a rational number which is \(2^{-k}\)-close to f(x). This computing-f(x) algorithm can call algorithms for computing approximations to the inputs \(x_i\).
-
We say that a compact set \(S\subseteq \mathrm{I\!R}^n\) is constructive if there exists an algorithm that, given a natural number k, returns a finite list of computable tuples \(x^{(1)}\), \(x^{(2)}\), ...from the set S which serve as a \(2^{-k}\)-net for S, i.e., for which every tuple \(x\in S\) is \(2^{-k}\)-close to one of the tuples \(x^{(i)}\) from this list.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ortiz, O., Salgado, H., Kosheleva, O., Kreinovich, V. (2023). Why Self-Esteem Helps to Solve Problems: An Algorithmic Explanation. In: Ceberio, M., Kreinovich, V. (eds) Uncertainty, Constraints, and Decision Making. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, vol 484. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36394-8_46
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36394-8_46
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-36393-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-36394-8
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)