Skip to main content

Why Self-Esteem Helps to Solve Problems: An Algorithmic Explanation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Uncertainty, Constraints, and Decision Making

Part of the book series: Studies in Systems, Decision and Control ((SSDC,volume 484))

  • 269 Accesses

Abstract

It is known that self-esteem helps solve problems. From the algorithmic viewpoint, this seems like a mystery: a boost in self-esteem does not provide us with new algorithms, does not provide us with ability to compute faster—but somehow, with the same algorithmic tools and the same ability to perform the corresponding computations, students become better problem solvers. In this paper, we provide an algorithmic explanation for this surprising empirical phenomenon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R.F. Baumeister, J.D. Campbell, J.I. Krueger, K.D. Vohs, Does high self-esteem cause better performance, interpersonal success, happiness, or healthier lifestyles? Psychol. Sci. Public Interes. 4(1), 1–44 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. M.J. Beeson, Foundations of Constructive Mathematics (Springer, N.Y., 1985)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. E. Bishop, Foundations of Constructive Analysis (McGraw-Hill, 1967)

    Google Scholar 

  4. E. Bishop, D.S. Bridges, Constructive Analysis (Springer, N.Y., 1985)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. M.Z. Booth, J.M. Gerard, Self-esteem and academic achievement: a comparative study of adolescent students in England and the United States. Comp.: J. Comp. Int. Educ. 41(5), 629–648 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. D.S. Bridges, Constructive Functional Analysis (Pitman, London, 1979)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. D.S. Bridges, S.L. Vita, Techniques of Constructive Analysis (Springer, New York, 2006)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. A. Di Paula, J.D. Campbell, Self-esteem and persistence in the face of failure. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 83(3), 711–724 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. B. Harris, Self-Esteem: 150 Ready-to-use Activities to Enhance the Self-Esteem of Children and Teenagers to Increase Student Success and Improve Behavior (CGS Communications, San Antonio, Texas, 2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. U. Kohlenbach, Theorie der majorisierbaren und stetigen Funktionale und ihre Anwendung bei der Extraktion von Schranken aus inkonstruktiven Beweisen: Effektive Eindeutigkeitsmodule bei besten Approximationen aus ineffektiven Eindeutigkeitsbeweisen, Ph.D. Dissertation, Frankfurt am Main (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  11. U. Kohlenbach, Effective moduli from ineffective uniqueness proofs: an unwinding of de La Vallée Poussin’s proof for Chebycheff approximation. Ann. Pure Appl. Log. 64(1), 27–94 (1993)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. U. Kohlenbach, Applied Proof Theory: Proof Interpretations and their Use in Mathematics (Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg, 2008)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. V. Kreinovich, Uniqueness implies algorithmic computability, in Proceedings of the 4th Student Mathematical Conference (Leningrad University, Leningrad, 1975), pp. 19–21 (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  14. V. Kreinovich, Reviewer’s remarks in a review of D.S. Bridges, in Constructive Functional Analysis (Pitman, London, 1979); Zentralblatt für Mathematik, 401, 22–24 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  15. V. Kreinovich, Categories of space-time models, Ph.D. Dissertation, Novosibirsk, Soviet Academy of Sciences, Siberian Branch, Institute of Mathematics (1979) (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  16. V. Kreinovich, Philosophy of Optimism: Notes on the Possibility of Using Algorithm Theory When Describing Historical Processes, Leningrad Center for New Information Technology “Informatika”, Technical Report, Leningrad (1989). ((in Russian))

    Google Scholar 

  17. V. Kreinovich, Physics-motivated ideas for extracting efficient bounds (and algorithms) from classical proofs: beyond local compactness, beyond uniqueness, in Abstracts of the Conference on the Methods of Proof Theory in Mathematics (Max-Planck Institut für Mathematik, Bonn, Germany, 3–10 June 2007), p. 8

    Google Scholar 

  18. V. Kreinovich, A. Lakeyev, J. Rohn, P. Kahl, Computational Complexity and Feasibility of Data Processing and Interval Computations (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1998)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. V. Kreinovich, K. Villaverde, Extracting computable bounds (and algorithms) from classical existence proofs: girard domains enable us to go beyond local compactness. Int. J. Intell. Technol. Appl. Stat. (IJITAS) 12(2), 99–134 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  20. B.A. Kushner, Lectures on Constructive Mathematical Analysis (American Mathematical Society, Providence, Rhode Island, 1984)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. D. Lacombe, Les ensembles récursivement ouvert ou fermés, et leurs applications à l’analyse récurslve. Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sci. 245(13), 1040–1043 (1957)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. V.A. Lifschitz, Investigation of constructive functions by the method of fillings. J. Sov. Math. 1, 41–47 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. L. Longpré, O. Kosheleva, V. Kreinovich, Baudelaire’s ideas of vagueness and uniqueness in art: algorithm-based explanations, in Decision Making under Uncertainty and Constraints: A Why-Book, ed. by M. Ceberio, V. Kreinovich (Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 2022) (to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  24. L. Longpré, V. Kreinovich, W. Gasarch, G.W. Walster, \(m\) solutions good, \(m-1\) solutions better. Appl. Math. Sci. 2(5), 223–239 (2008)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. C.W. Loo, J.L.F. Choy, Sources of self-efficacy influencing academic performance of engineering students. Am. J. Educ. Res. 1(3), 86–92 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. H.W. Marsh, Causal ordering of academic self-concept and academic achievement: a multiwave, longitudinal path analysis. J. Educ. Psychol. 82(4), 646–656 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. L. Noronha, M. Monteiro, N. Pinto, A study on the self-esteem and academic performance among the students. Int. J. Health Sci. Pharm. (IJHSP) 2(1), 1–7 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  28. A. Ntem, Every student’s compass: a simple guide to help students deal with low self-esteem, set academic goals, choose the right career and make a difference in the society (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  29. M. Pour-El, J. Richards, Computability in Analysis and Physics (Springer, New York, 1989)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. M. Rosenberg, C. Schooler, C. Schoenbach, F. Rosenberg, Global self-esteem and specific self-esteem: different concepts, different outcomes. Am. Sociol. Rev. 60(1), 141–156 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. K. Weihrauch, Computable Analysis: An Introduction (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2000)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. S.Y. Yoon, P.K. Imbrie, T. Reed, Development of the leadership self-efficacy scale for engineering students, in Proceedings of the 123rd Annual Conference and Exposition of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) (New Orleans, Louisiana, 26–29 June 2016) (Paper 15784)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by the National Science Foundation grants 1623190 (A Model of Change for Preparing a New Generation for Professional Practice in Computer Science), and HRD-1834620 and HRD-2034030 (CAHSI Includes), and by the AT&T Fellowship in Information Technology.

It was also supported by the program of the development of the Scientific-Educational Mathematical Center of Volga Federal District No. 075-02-2020-1478, and by a grant from the Hungarian National Research, Development and Innovation Office (NRDI).

The authors are thankful to all the participants of the 27th Joint NMSU/UTEP Workshop on Mathematics, Computer Science, and Computational Sciences (Las Cruces, New Mexico, April 2, 2022) for valuable suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vladik Kreinovich .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix: What Is Computable: An Overview of the Main Definitions

Appendix: What Is Computable: An Overview of the Main Definitions

  • We say that a real number x is computable if there exists an algorithm that, given a natural number k, returns a rational number r which is \(2^{-k}\)-close to x:

    $$|x-r|\le 2^{-k}.$$
  • We say that a tuple of real numbers \(x=(x_1,\ldots ,x_n)\) is computable if all the numbers \(x_i\) in this tuple are computable.

  • We say that a function f(x) from tuples of real numbers to real numbers is computable if there exists an algorithm that, given algorithms for computing \(x_i\) and a natural number k, returns a rational number which is \(2^{-k}\)-close to f(x). This computing-f(x) algorithm can call algorithms for computing approximations to the inputs \(x_i\).

  • We say that a compact set \(S\subseteq \mathrm{I\!R}^n\) is constructive if there exists an algorithm that, given a natural number k, returns a finite list of computable tuples \(x^{(1)}\), \(x^{(2)}\), ...from the set S which serve as a \(2^{-k}\)-net for S, i.e., for which every tuple \(x\in S\) is \(2^{-k}\)-close to one of the tuples \(x^{(i)}\) from this list.

See [2,3,4, 6, 7, 18, 20, 29, 31] for details.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ortiz, O., Salgado, H., Kosheleva, O., Kreinovich, V. (2023). Why Self-Esteem Helps to Solve Problems: An Algorithmic Explanation. In: Ceberio, M., Kreinovich, V. (eds) Uncertainty, Constraints, and Decision Making. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, vol 484. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36394-8_46

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics