Skip to main content

Software Project Management Approaches Used in the Context of Agile Development: A Systematic Literature Mapping

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Evaluation of Novel Approaches to Software Engineering (ENASE 2022)

Abstract

Project management is of significant importance to the success of software development, as experts remind us. However, projects have a high degree of uncertainty and are complex in nature. This suggests that specific approaches are needed to manage these threats. Using the right approach can be critical to the success of a project. Knowing the importance of project management and how the approaches can be fundamental to help managers, this work sought to identify in the literature the project management approaches that are used in agile software development. To achieve the objective, a systematic literature mapping study was carried out, which made it possible to identify eight distinct categories of approaches that are used in agile software project management. In addition, it was possible to identify that the approaches are most commonly applied to manage the schedule, quality and communication of projects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Project Management Institute: A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide), 6th edn., Project Management Institute (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Martins, J.C.C.: Gerenciando Projetos de Desenvolvimento de Software com PMI, RUP e UML. Brasport (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kerzner, H.: Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling. Wiley (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gomes, J., Romão, M.: Improving project success: a case study using benefits and project management. Procedia Comput. Sci. 100, pp. 489–97 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.09.187

  5. Franco, E.F., Hirama, K., Carvalho, M.M.: Applying system dynamics approach in software and information system projects: a mapping study. Inf. Softw. Technol. 93, 58–73 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2017.08.013

  6. Beck, K.: The Agile Manifesto. Agile Alliance. - References - Scientific Research Publishing (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Drury-Grogan, M.L., Conboy, K., Acton, T.: Examining decision characteristics & challenges for agile software development. J. Syst. Softw. 131, 248–65 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2017.06.003

  8. Kostalova, J., Tetrevova, L., Svedik, J.: Support of project management methods by project management information system. Procedia – Soc. Behav. Sci. 210, 96–104 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.333

  9. Shrivastava, S.V., Rathod, U.: A risk management framework for distributed agile projects. Inf. Softw. Technol. 85, 1–15 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2016.12.005

  10. Varajão, J., Colomo-Palacios, R., Silva, H.: ISO 21500:2012 and PMBoK 5 processes in information systems project management. Comput. Stan. Interfaces 50, 216–222 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csi.2016.09.007

  11. Radujković, M., Sjekavica, M.: Project management success factors. Procedia Eng. 196, 607–615 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.08.048

  12. Soares, M.d.S.: Metodologias Ágeis Extreme Programming e Scrum para o Desenvolvimento de Software. Revista Eletrônica de Sistemas de Informação 3(1) (2004). https://doi.org/10.21529/resi.2004.0301006

  13. Kitchenham, B.: Systematic reviews. In: 10th International Symposium on Software Metrics, Proceedings. IEEE (2004). https://doi.org/10.1109/metric.2004.1357885. Acedido em 19 jul 2022

  14. Kitchenham, B., Charters, S.: Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ghapanchi, A.H., Aurum, A.: Antecedents to IT personnel’s intentions to leave: a systematic literature review. J. Syst. Softw. 84(2), 238–49 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2010.09.022

  16. Biolchini, J.C.de.A., Mian, P.G., Natali, A.C.C., Conte, T.U., Travassos, G.H.: Scientific research ontology to support systematic review in software engineering. Adv. Eng. Inf. 21(2), 133–151 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Codas, M.M.B.: Gerência de projetos: uma reflexão histórica. Revista de Administração de Empresas 27(1), 33–37 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1590/s0034-75901987000100004

  18. Heldman, K.: Gerência de projetos: guia para o exame oficial do PMI. Gulf Professional Publishing (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Banica, L., Hagiu, A., Bagescu, A., Gherghinescu, A.: Designing a website for a recruitment agency with Pmbok methodology. Sci. Bull.-Econ. Sci. 17(1), 60–67 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gonçalves, R.Q., von Wangenheim, C.G.: An Instructional unit for teaching project management tools aligned with PMBOK. In: 2016 IEEE 29th International Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training (CSEET). IEEE (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/cseet.2016.10

  21. Taniguchi, A., Onosato, M.: Effect of continuous improvement on the reporting quality of project management information system for project management success. Int. J. Inf. Technol. Comput. Sci. 10(1), 1–15 (2018). https://doi.org/10.5815/ijitcs.2018.01.01

  22. Carvalho, E.da.C., Malcher, P.R.C., Santos, R.P.D.: A survey research on the use of mobile applications in software project management. In: SBQS 2020: 19th Brazilian Symposium on Software Quality. ACM (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3439961.3439963

  23. Versionone, C.: 15th annual state of agile report. CollabNet (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Matos, S., Lopes, E.: Prince2 or PMBOK – a question of choice. Procedia Technol. 9, 787–94 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2013.12.087

  25. Basili, V.R.: Software modeling and measurement: the Goal/Question/Metric paradigm (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Petersen, K., Vakkalanka, S., Kuzniarz, L.: Guidelines for conducting systematic mapping studies in software engineering: an update. Inf. Softw. Technol. 64, 1–18 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2015.03.007

  27. Yanow, S.K., Good, M.F.: Nonessential research in the new normal: the impact of COVID-19. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 102(6), 1164–1165 (2020). https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.20-0325

  28. Zhang, S., Lan, J.: Research on software project schedule management method based on monte Carlo simulation. In: 2020 IEEE 5th Information Technology and Mechatronics Engineering Conference (ITOEC). IEEE (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/itoec49072.2020.9141570

  29. Lin, X., et al.: Health literacy, computer skills and quality of patient-physician communication in Chinese patients with cataract. PLoS One 9(9), e107615 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Uspenskiy, M.B., Smirnov, S.V., Loginova, A., Shirokova, S.V.: Modelling of complex project management system in the field of information technologies. In: 2019 III International Conference on Control in Technical Systems (CTS). IEEE (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/cts48763.2019.8973245

  31. Shaikh, T.H., Khan, F.L., Shaikh, N.A., Shah, H.N., Pirani, Z.: Survey of web-based project management system. In: 2018 International Conference on Smart Systems and Inventive Technology (ICSSIT). IEEE (2018), https://doi.org/10.1109/icssit.2018.8748784

  32. Michael, D., Dazki, E., Santoso, H., Indrajit, R.E.: Scrum team ownership maturity analysis on achieving goal. In: 2021 Sixth International Conference on Informatics and Computing (ICIC). IEEE (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/icic54025.2021.9632969

  33. Raharjo, T., Purwandari, B.: Agile project management challenges and mapping solutions. In: ICSIM 2020: The 3rd International Conference on Software Engineering and Information Management. ACM (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3378936.3378949

  34. Vieira, M., Hauck, J.C.R., Matalonga, S.: How explicit risk management is being integrated into agile methods: results from a systematic literature mapping. In: SBQS 2020: 19th Brazilian Symposium on Software Quality. ACM (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3439961.3439976

  35. Carvalho, E., Oliveira, S.: The diversity of approaches to support software project management in the agile context: trends, comparisons and gaps. In: 17th International Conference on Evaluation of Novel Approaches to Software Engineering, SCITEPRESS - Science and Technology Publications (2022). https://doi.org/10.5220/0011063500003176

  36. Souza, M.R.de.A., Veado, L., Moreira, R.T., Figueiredo, E., Costa, H.: A systematic mapping study on game-related methods for software engineering education. Inf. Softw. Technol. 95, 201–218 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2017.09.014

  37. Wohlin, C., Runeson, P., Höst, M., Ohlsson, M.C., Regnell, B., Wesslén, A.: Experimentation in Software Engineering - An Introduction. Kluwer Academic Press (2000)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) in Brazil for the financial support for the granting of a scholarship for a master’s degree.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sandro Ronaldo Bezerra Oliveira .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

da Costa Carvalho, E., Ronaldo Bezerra Oliveira, S. (2023). Software Project Management Approaches Used in the Context of Agile Development: A Systematic Literature Mapping. In: Kaindl, H., Mannion, M., Maciaszek, L.A. (eds) Evaluation of Novel Approaches to Software Engineering. ENASE 2022. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1829. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36597-3_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36597-3_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-36596-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-36597-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics