Skip to main content

Pyrorank: A Novel Nature-Inspired Algorithm to Promote Diversity in Recommender Systems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Swarm Intelligence (ICSI 2023)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 13969))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Recommender systems are essential to many of the largest internet companies’ core products. Today's online users expect sites offering a vast assortment of products to provide personalized recommendations. Although traditional recommender systems optimize for prediction accuracy, such as RMSE, they often fail to address other important aspects of recommendation quality. In this paper, we explore the crucial issue of diversity in the recommendations generated by recommender systems. We explain why diversity is essential in recommender systems and review related work on diversifying recommendations. We quantify and classify various diversity metrics into logical categories. Then, we introduce Pyrorank, a novel bio-inspired re-ranking algorithm designed to improve recommendation diversity. Pyrorank is inspired by the positive effects of pyrodiversity in nature and is optimized to increase user-based diversity and mitigate the systemic bias that traditional recommender system models learn from the data. Our experimental results on multiple large datasets indicate that Pyrorank can achieve better user-based diversity metrics than state-of-the-art re-ranking methods, with little decrease in prediction accuracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. MacKenzie, I., Meyer, C., Noble, S.: How retailers can keep up with consumers. McKinsey Comp. 18(1), 1–10 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pariser, E.: The Filter Bubble: What the Internet is Hiding from You. Penguin ,UK (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gerrard, Y., Gillespie, T.: When algorithms think you want to die. Wired Maga. 21 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Covington, P., Adams, J., Sargin, E.: Deep neural networks for YouTube recommendations. In: Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, pp. 191–198. ACM (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dwoskin, E.: Youtube is changing its algorithms to stop recommending conspiracies. Washington Post (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Youtube takes ads off ’anti-vax’ video channels. BBC UK (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Alexander, J.: Youtube fought brie larson trolls by changing its search algorithm. Verge Maga. (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chaney, A.J.B., Stewart, B.M., Engelhardt, B.E.: How algorithmic confounding in recommendation systems increases homogeneity and decreases utility. In: Proceedings of the 12th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, Series, RecSys 2018, pp. 224–232. ACM, New York (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Castagnos, S., Brun, A., Boyer, A.: When diversity is needed… but not expected. In: International Conference on Advances in Information Mining and Management, pp. 44–50. IARIA XPS Press (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Biswas, S.R., Mallik, A.U.: Disturbance effects on species diversity and functional diversity in riparian and upland plant communities. Ecology 91(1), 28–35 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Salton, G., McGill, M.J.: Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval. McGraw-Hill, New York (1986)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Smyth, B., McClave, P.: Similarity vs. diversity. In: Aha, D.W., Watson, I. (eds.) ICCBR 2001. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2080, pp. 347–361. Springer, Heidelberg (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44593-5_25

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Bradley, K., Smyth, B.: Improving recommendation diversity (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  14. McSherry, D.: Diversity-conscious retrieval. In: Craw, S., Preece, A. (eds.) ECCBR 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2416, pp. 219–233. Springer, Heidelberg (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46119-1_17

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Kunaver, M., Pozˇrl, T.: Diversity in recommender systems – a survey. Knowl.-Based Syst. 123, 154–162 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fleder, D.M., Hosanagar, K.: Recommender systems and their impact on sales diversity. In: Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, Series, EC 2007, pp. 192–199. ACM, New York (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Clarke, C.L., et al.: Novelty and diversity in information retrieval evaluation. In: Proceedings of the 31st Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on RESEARCH and Development in Information Retrieval SIGIR 2008, p. 659. ACM, New York (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zhou, T., Kuscsik, Z., Liu, J.-G., Medo, M., Wakeling, J. R., Zhang, Y.-C.: Solving the apparent diversity-accuracy dilemma of recommender systems. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 107, no. 10, pp. 4511–4515, (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lathia, N., Hailes, S., Capra, L., Amatriain, X.: Temporal diversity in recommender systems. In: Proceeding of the 33rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval SIGIR 2010, p. 210. ACM, New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nguyen, T.T., Hui, P.-M., Harper, F.M., Terveen, L., Konstan, J.A.: Exploring the filter bubble. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web WWW 2014, pp. 677–686. ACM, New York (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Adamopoulos, P., Tuzhilin, A.: On unexpectedness in recommender systems: or how to better expect the unexpected. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol, (TIST) 5(4), 54 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hurley, N., Zhang, M.: Novelty and DIVERSITY in top-N recommendation-analysis and EVALUATION. ACM Trans. Internet Technol. 10(4), 1–30 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. L’Huillier, A., Castagnos, S., Boyer, A.: Understanding usages by modeling diversity over time. In: Proceedings of the 22nd Conference on user modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization UMAP 2014, vol. 1181 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Adomavicius, G., Kwon, Y.: Improving aggregate recommendation diversity using ranking-based techniques. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 24(5), 896–911 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Aytekin, T., Karakaya, M.O.: Clustering-based diversity improvement in top-N recommendation. J. Intell. Inf. Syst. 42(1), 1–18 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ponisio, L.C., et al.: Pyrodiversity begets plant–pollinator community diversity. Glob. Change Biol. 22(5), 1794–1808 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Connel, J.H.: Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs. Science 199(4335), 1302–1310 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Webster, K.M., Halpern, C.B.: Long-term vegetation responses to reintroduction and repeated use of fire in mixed-conifer forests of the Sierra Nevada. Ecosphere 1(5), art9 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kunaver, M., Dobravec, S., Kosˇir, A.: Using latent features to measure the diversity of recommendation lists. In: 2015 38th International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO), pp. 1230–1234. IEEE (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Koren, Y.: The bellkor solution to the Netflix grand prize. Netflix Prize Doc. 81, 1–10 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Harper, F. M., Konstan, J. A.: The movielens datasets: history and context. ACM Trans. Interact. Intell. Syst. 5(4), 19:1–19:19 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Zajac, Z.: Goodbooks-10k: a new dataset for book recommendations. In: FastML (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wan, M., McAuley, J.: Item recommendation on monotonic behavior chains. In: Proceedings of the 12th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, pp. 86–94. ACM (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Boytsov, L., Naidan, B.: Engineering efficient and effective non-metric space library. In: Brisaboa, N., Pedreira, O., Zezula, P. (eds.) SISAP 2013. LNCS, vol. 8199, pp. 280–293. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41062-8_28

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Mengting Wan and Julian McAuley for the new Goodreads dataset and responding promptly to our emails about the dataset.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anasse Bari .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kilitcioglu, D., Greenquist, N., Bari, A. (2023). Pyrorank: A Novel Nature-Inspired Algorithm to Promote Diversity in Recommender Systems. In: Tan, Y., Shi, Y., Luo, W. (eds) Advances in Swarm Intelligence. ICSI 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13969. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36625-3_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36625-3_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-36624-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-36625-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics