Skip to main content

A Semiotic Analysis of the Representativeness of BPMN Graphic Elements

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Business Modeling and Software Design (BMSD 2023)

Abstract

Business Process Modeling (BPM) has been under considerable attention from business and information technology (IT) communities. It is an important asset in the quest to decrease the gap in communication between these two groups. To contribute to decreasing this gap, this paper presents the execution of a quasi-experiment to verify whether Business Process Modelling Notation’s (BPMN) graphical elements are representative according to their semantics. Data collected with 89 participants, so far, through a semiotic analysis has shown that the notations’ elements are based on symbolic signs, understood due to shared law, while participants showed preference for iconic signs, that have visual relation to the real object.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kunze, M., Luebbe, A., Weidlich, M., Weske, M.: Towards understanding process modeling - the case of the bpm academic initiative. In: et al., Business Process Model and Notation, pp. 44–58. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). Doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25160-3_4

  2. Chinosi, M., Trombetta, A.: BPMN: an introduction to the standard. Comput. Stand. Interfaces 34(1), 124–134 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dumas, M., La Rosa, M., Mendling, J., Reijers, H.A.: Fundamentals of Business Process Management, 2nd edn.. Springer, Heidelberg (2018). Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-56509-4

  4. Mendling, J., et al.: Blockchains for business process management - challenges and opportunities. 9(1), Feb 2018

    Google Scholar 

  5. Evans, E.: Domain-Driven Design: Tackling Complexity in the Heart of Software. Addison-Wesley Professional, 1st edn. (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Caire, P., Genon, N., Heymans, P., Moody, D.L.: Visual notation design 2.0: Towards user comprehensible requirements engineering notations. In: 2013 21st IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE), pp. 115–124 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  7. OMG-BPMN. Business process model and notation (2.0.2). Technical report, Object Management Group (2014). https://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN

  8. Harmon, P., Wolf, C.: Business process modeling survey, 2011. A BPTrends Report - Business Process Trends

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kossak, F., et al.: A rigorous semantics for BPMN 2.0 process diagrams, 1st edn. Springer (2014). Doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79396-0_13

  10. Mendling, J., Strembeck, M.: Influence factors of understanding business process models. In: Abramowicz, W., Fensel, D. (eds.) Business Information Systems, pp. 142–153. Springer, Heidelberg, (2008). Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79396-0_13

  11. Santaella, L.: SemiĂłtica Aplicada. Cengage Learning, 2nd edn. (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Peirce, C.S.: SemiĂłtica. Editora Perspectiva, 4th edn. (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Santos, M., Gralha, C., GoulĂŁo, M., AraĂşjo, J.: Increasing the semantic transparency of the KAOS goal model concrete syntax. In: et al., editor, Conceptual Modeling, pp. 424-439. Springer, Cham (2018). Doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00847-5_30

  14. Wohlin, C., Runeson, P., Host, M., Ohlsson, M.C., Regnell, B., Wesslen, A.: Experimentation in Software Engineering, 1st edn. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2012)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Montgomery, D.C., Runger, G.C.: Applied Statistics and Probability for Engineers. John Wiley Sons, 6th edn. (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Figl, K., Mendling, J., Strembeck, M.: Towards a usability assessment of process modeling languages. In: Proc. of the 8th Workshop Geschäftsprozessmanagement mit Ereignisgesteuerten Prozessketten (EPK 2009), pp. 118–138. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Berlin, Germany (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the NEPSI research group at UFPE for their support during this work, and CNPq (ref. 433419/2018-0) and FACEPE (ref. APQ-0867-6.02/22) for their financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Denis Silva da Silveira .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Duarte, E.B., Duarte, R.B., da Silveira, D.S. (2023). A Semiotic Analysis of the Representativeness of BPMN Graphic Elements. In: Shishkov, B. (eds) Business Modeling and Software Design. BMSD 2023. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 483. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36757-1_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36757-1_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-36756-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-36757-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics