Abstract
One way of improving the efficiency of system development is through the adoption of new methods. These, upon adoption, can provide the development team with the capabilities to address the current challenges. Once a team decides to follow this path, selecting which methods to adopt is a task ahead. The state-of-the-art provides a plethora of options. The criteria should be choosing methods yielding the highest net benefit towards the adoption goal. Many criteria influence the assessment of methods’ value. Knowing which ones are relevant and how they are related is essential to complete this task with excellence. In this paper, we propose a conceptual model describing elements of the decision-making process when selecting software engineering methods to be adopted by development teams. We aim to make explicit much of the knowledge involved in this process, i.e., mechanisms and influencing factors, to foster proper value assessment of methods. For researchers, our work can serve as guidelines to describe methods, for the industry, the model allows the comparison of assessment methods and better-motivated business plans.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Project Management Institute. https://www.pmi.org/. Accessed: 07.05.2023
Ågerfalk, P.J., Wistrand, K.: Systems development method rationale: a conceptual framework for analysis. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS’03) (2003)
Ali, R., Dalpiaz, F., Giorgini, P.: A goal-based framework for contextual requirements modeling and analysis. Requirements Eng. 15(4), 439–458 (2010)
Amorim, T., Vogelsang, A., Dias Canedo, E.: Decision support for process maturity improvement in model-based systems engineering. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Software and System Processes (ICSSP’22) (2022)
Amorim, T., Vogelsang, A., Pudlitz, F., Gersing, P., Philipps, J.: Strategies and best practices for model-based systems engineering adoption in embedded systems industry. In: Proceedings of the 41st ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Practice (ICSE-SEIP 2019) (2019)
Andersson, B., Guarino, N., Johannesson, P., Livieri, B.: Towards an ontology of value ascription. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems (FOIS 2016), vol. 283 (2016)
Arora, C., Sabetzadeh, M., Briand, L.C.: An empirical study on the potential usefulness of domain models for completeness checking of requirements. Empir. Softw. Eng. 24(4), 2509–2539 (2019)
Booch, G., Rumbaugh, J., Jacobson, I.: Unified Modeling Language User Guide, The (2nd Edition) (Addison-Wesley Object Technology Series). Addison-Wesley Professional (2005)
Bourque, P., Fairley, R.E. (eds.): SWEBOK: Guide to the Software Engineering Body of Knowledge. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, version 3.0 edn. (2014). https://www.swebok.org/, Accessed: 07.05.2023
Clarke, P., O’Connor, R.: The situational factors that affect the software development process: Towards a comprehensive reference framework. Inf. Softw. Technol. 54 (2012)
Ebert, F., Castor, F., Novielli, N., Serebrenik, A.: Confusion in code reviews: reasons, impacts, and coping strategies. In: 2019 IEEE 26th International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution and Reengineering (SANER), pp. 49–60 (2019)
Gonzalez-Perez, C., Giorgini, P., Henderson-Sellers, B.: Method construction by goal analysis. In: Information Systems Development, pp. 79–91. Springer, US, Boston (2009)
Héder, M.: From nasa to eu: the evolution of the trl scale in public sector innovation. Innov. J. 22, 1 (2017)
Horkoff, J., et al.: Goal-oriented requirements engineering: an extended systematic mapping study. Requirements Eng. 24(2), 133–160 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00766-017-0280-z
Kambil, A., Ginsberg, A., Bloch, M.: Re-inventing value propositions. NYU Stern School of Business Research Paper Series
Merriam-Webster: Context. In: Merriam-Webster.com dictionary (2021). https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/context. Accessed: 07.05.2023
Pankowska, M.: Business motivation model for information system architecture development support. J. Softw. Syst. Dev. (2021)
Papatheocharous, E., Wnuk, K., Petersen, K., Sentilles, S., Cicchetti, A., Gorschek, T., Shah, S.M.A.: The grade taxonomy for supporting decision-making of asset selection in software-intensive system development. Inf. Softw. Technol. 100, 1–17 (2018)
PMI: PMI’s Pulse of the Profession (2017)
Zúñiga y Postigo, G.: An ontology of economic objects. Mpra paper, University Library of Munich, Germany (1999)
Sales, T.P., Baião, F.A., Guizzardi, G., Almeida, J.P.A., Guarino, N., Mylopoulos, J.: The common ontology of value and risk. In: Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Conceptual Modeling (ER’18) (2018)
Sales, T.P., Guarino, N., Guizzardi, G., Mylopoulos, J.: An ontological analysis of value propositions. In: 2017 IEEE 21st International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC), pp. 184–193 (2017)
Thalheim, B.: Towards a theory of conceptual modelling. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 45–54. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
Thomson, P.: Static analysis. Commun. ACM 65(1), 50–54 (2021)
Vogelsang, A., Amorim, T., Pudlitz, F., Gersing, P., Philipps, J.: Should I Stay or Should I Go? On Forces that Drive and Prevent MBSE Adoption in the Embedded Systems Industry (2017)
Acknowledgments
This work has been supported by the German Ministry of Research and Education (BMBF) within project SpesML (Sysml workbench für die SPES methodik) under grant 01IS20092C.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Amorim, T., Vogelsang, A. (2023). A Conceptual Model for the Selection of Methods for Software Engineering Process Improvement. In: Shishkov, B. (eds) Business Modeling and Software Design. BMSD 2023. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 483. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36757-1_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36757-1_23
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-36756-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-36757-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)