Skip to main content

Continuous Dependability Assessment of Microservice Systems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Software Architecture. ECSA 2022 Tracks and Workshops (ECSA 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 13928))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 306 Accesses

Abstract

In this paper, we overview the tutorial presented at the 16th European Conference on Software Architecture. The tutorial’s goal was to summarize the challenges and approaches for verification and validation in microservices systems. We introduced the PPTAM approach for dependability assessment. PPTAM employs a variety of architectural artifacts and steps, including the use of operational data obtained from production-level application performance management (APM) tools, the automated assessment of load tests based on defined scalability requirements, and the development of computationally efficient algorithms for software performance anti-pattern (SPA) detection that could be implemented in CI/CD pipelines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The relative call frequency represents the proportion that a service contributes to accomplish the task of the system under study. If a service contributes 10% and fails, we consider the system to be 90% functional.

  2. 2.

    PPTAM including a demo is publicly available at https://github.com/pptam.

  3. 3.

    https://openapm.io/.

  4. 4.

    https://www.influxdata.com/.

  5. 5.

    https://jupyter.org/.

  6. 6.

    https://locust.io.

References

  1. Arcelli, D., Cortellessa, V., Trubiani, C.: Experimenting the influence of numerical thresholds on model-based detection and refactoring of performance antipatterns. Electron. Commun. EASST. 59 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Avritzer, A., et al.: Scalability testing automation using multivariate characterization and detection of software performance antipatterns. J. Syst. Softw. 193 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Avritzer, A., et al.: A multivariate characterization and detection of software performance antipatterns. In: ICPE 2021: ACM/SPEC International Conference on Performance Engineering. ACM (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Avritzer, A., et al.: Pptam\({}^{\lambda }\): What, where, and how of cross-domain scalability assessment. In: 18th IEEE International Conference on Software Architecture (ICSA). IEEE (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Avritzer, A., et al.: Scalability assessment of microservice architecture deployment configurations: a domain-based approach leveraging operational profiles and load tests. J. Syst. Softw. 165 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Avritzer, A., Ferme, V., Janes, A., Russo, B., Schulz, H., van Hoorn, A.: A quantitative approach for the assessment of microservice architecture deployment alternatives by automated performance testing. In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Software Architecture (ECSA) (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Avritzer, A., et al.: PPTAM: production and performance testing based application monitoring. In: Companion of the ACM/SPEC International Conference on Performance Engineering (ICPE) (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Calinescu, R., Cortellessa, V., Stefanakos, I., Trubiani, C.: Analysis and Refactoring of Software Systems Using Performance Antipattern Profiles (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45234-6_18

  9. Camilli, M., Russo, B.: Modeling performance of microservices systems with growth theory. Empir. Softw. Eng. 27(2), 1–44 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-021-10088-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Camilli, M., Colarusso, C., Russo, B., Zimeo, E.: Domain metric driven decomposition of data-intensive applications. In: 2020 IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering Workshops (ISSREW), pp. 189–196 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSREW51248.2020.00071

  11. Camilli, M., Colarusso, C., Russo, B., Zimeo, E.: Actor-driven decomposition of microservices through multi-level scalability assessment. ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. (2023, to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Camilli, M., Guerriero, A., Janes, A., Russo, B., Russo, S.: Microservices integrated performance and reliability testing. In: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Automation of Software Test. ACM (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Camilli, M., Janes, A., Russo, B.: Automated test-based learning and verification of performance models for microservices systems. JSS 187 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cortellessa, V., Di Marco, A., Eramo, R., Pierantonio, A., Trubiani, C.: Approaching the model-driven generation of feedback to remove software performance flaws. In: Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cusick, J., Avritzer, A., Tse, A., Janes, A.: Automated Dependability Assessment in DevOps Environments. In: IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering Workshops, ISSRE 2022 - Workshops, Charlotte, NC, USA, October 31–November 3, 2022. IEEE (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Heger, C., van Hoorn, A., Mann, M., Okanovic, D.: Application performance management: state of the art and challenges for the future. In: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/SPEC International Conference on Performance Engineering (ICPE) (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Microsoft: Performance tuning a distributed application (2019). https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/performance/

  18. Pinciroli, R., Smith, C.U., Trubiani, C.: QN-based modeling and analysis of software performance antipatterns for cyber-physical systems. In: Proceedings of the ACM/SPEC International Conference on Performance Engineering (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Schulz, H., Okanovic, D., van Hoorn, A., Ferme, V., Pautasso, C.: Behavior-driven load testing using contextual knowledge-approach and experiences. In: Companion of the ACM/SPEC International Conference on Performance Engineering (ICPE) (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Smith, C.U., Williams, L.G.: Software performance antipatterns for identifying and correcting performance problems. In: International Computer Measurement Group Conference (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jansen, A., Malavolta, I., Muccini, H., Ozkaya, I., Zimmermann, O. (eds.) ECSA 2020. LNCS, vol. 12292. Springer, Cham (2020 ). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58923-3

  22. Trubiani, C., Di Marco, A., Cortellessa, V., Mani, N., Petriu, D.: Exploring synergies between bottleneck analysis and performance antipatterns. In: Proceedings of the 5th ACM/SPEC International Conference on Performance Engineering (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Trubiani, C., Ghabi, A., Egyed, A.: Exploiting traceability uncertainty between software architectural models and performance analysis results. In: Weyns, D., Mirandola, R., Crnkovic, I. (eds.) ECSA 2015. LNCS, vol. 9278, pp. 305–321. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23727-5_26

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alberto Avritzer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Avritzer, A., Camilli, M., Janes, A., Russo, B., Trubiani, C., van Hoorn, A. (2023). Continuous Dependability Assessment of Microservice Systems. In: Batista, T., Bureš, T., Raibulet, C., Muccini, H. (eds) Software Architecture. ECSA 2022 Tracks and Workshops. ECSA 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13928. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36889-9_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36889-9_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-36888-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-36889-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics