Skip to main content

Crowdmapping: Inclusive Cities and Evaluation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2023 Workshops (ICCSA 2023)

Abstract

Recent technological innovations are redefining some key steps in the disciplines dealing with urban changes and the evaluation processes connected to the decision-making support system. Moreover, the voluntary input of community stakeholders has, over time, become the procedural center of most decision-making nodes. In addition to traditional participatory techniques, technology is enabling a new phase of less wasteful citizenship practices, where the participatory contribution is the provision of knowledge-based local knowledge the return of data based on voluntary contribution. This is the case of crowdsourcing, a web model based on open and voluntary collaboration in investigation or research by an indefinite and large group of people, aimed at building an informational mapping.

The paper aims to return some of the recent applications of crowdmapping by highlighting the possible contributions that these processes can make to the implementation of information in the service of project evaluation tools.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    There is a tendency to refer to Web 2.0 as the set of all online applications that allow a high level of site-user interaction such as social media, forums etc.

  2. 2.

    Some of the sub-categories in the literature are: crowdfunding (collective financing), crowdcreation (collective creativity), crowdvoting (collective voting), crowdwisdom (collective wisdom), crowd-shipping (collective shipping services), crowd-solving (col-lective problem-solving).

  3. 3.

    The CIRCO project maps can be found at the following address: https://laboratoriocirco.wordpress.com/2018/04/07/mappe/; CIRCO is a research lead by proff. Francesco Careri e Fabrizio Finucci with Chiara Luchetti, Alberto Marzo, Sara Monaco, Serena Olcuire, Enrico Perini, Maria Rocco.

References

  1. Sanchez, T.W., Shumway, H., Gordner, T., Lim, T.: The prospects of artificial intelligence in urban planning. Int. J. Urban Sci. 26, 1–16 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kontokosta, C.E.: Urban informatics in the science and practice of planning. J. Plan. Educ. Res. 41(4), 382–395 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chui, M., et al.: The social economy: unlocking value and productivity through social technologies. J. Plann. Educ. Res. (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Howe, J.: The Rise of Crowdsourcing. Wired Magazine 14, 1–4 (2006). https://www.wired.com/2006/06/crowds/. last access 2023/04/03

  5. Diop, E.B., Chenal, J., Tekouabou, S.C.K., Azmi, R.: Crowdsourcing public engagement for urban planning in the global south: methods, challenges and suggestions for future research. Sustainability 14(18), 1–21 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yates, D., Paquette, S.: Emergency knowledge management and social media technologies: a case study of the 2010 Haitian earthquake. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 31, 6–13 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Starbird, K., Palen, L.: Voluntweeters: self-organizing by digital volunteers in times of crisis. In: SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1071–1080 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Estellés-Arolas, E., González-Ladrón-De-Guevara, F.: Towards an integrated crowdsourcing definition. J. Inf. Sci. 38(2), 189–200 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Quintance, K.: What is crowdmapping? https://kimoquaintance.com/2011/09/04/concepts-to-know-crowdmapping/. last access 2023/04/03

  10. Participatory Mapping for Decision Making | SSWM - Find tools for sustainable sanitation and water management. https://sswm.info/planning-and-programming/decision-making/deciding-community/participatory-mapping-for-decision-making. last access 2023/04/03

  11. Miccoli, S., Finucci, F., Murro, R.: Integrating stated preference methods for property valuations in housing markets. Int. J. Hous. Markets Anal. 12(3), 474–486 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Griffin, G.P., Jiao, J.: The geography and equity of crowdsourced public participation for active transportation planning. Transp. Res. Rec. 2673(1), 460–468 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Schuurman, D., Baccarne, B., De Marez, L., Mechant, P.: Smart ideas for smart cities: investigating crowdsourcing for generating and selecting ideas for ICT innovation in a city context. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 7(3), 49–62 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Douglas, R.: What We Mean By Inclusive Cities. https://nextcity.org/informalcity/entry/commentary-what-we-mean-by-inclusive-cities#:~:text=An%20inclusive%20city%20is%20one,people%20and%20their%20needs%20equally. last access 2023/04/03

  15. Larrota-Forero, R.A., González-Sanabria, J.S., Sarmiento-Rojas, J.A.: Proposal for the implementation of crowdmapping for the recognition of social housing in urban city councils. Revista Facultad de Ingeniería 31(62), 1–17 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ushahidi - Inform Decisions & Empower Communities. https://www.ushahidi.com/about/our-story/. last access 2023/04/03

  17. Qiu, S., Bozzon, A., Psyllidis, A., Houben, G.J.: Crowd-mapping urban objects from street-level imagery. In: Conference 2019 - Proceedings of the World Wide Web Conference, WWW 2019, pp. 1521–1531 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Van Alphen, G.: A multi-platform crowd-mapping application for urban object mapping using street-level imagery. Delft University of Technology (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mezzacapo, U.: Crowdmap e Civic Engagement Nella Società Digitale. Università di Bologna, Alma Mater Studiorum (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Shen, L.Y., Ochoa, J., Shah, M.N., Zhang, X.: The application of urban sustainability indicators - a comparison between various practices. Habitat Int. 35(1), 17–29 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Miccoli, S., Finucci, F, Murro, R.: The evaluation of architectural design quality. In: SGEM 2014 Scientific Sub Conference on arts, performing arts, architecture and design, pp. 1023–1030 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  22. De Filippi, F., Coscia, C., Cocina, G.: Piattaforme collaborative per progetti di innovazione sociale. Il caso Miramap a Torino. Techne 14, 219–226 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Coscia, C., De Filippi, F.: The crowdmapping mirafiori sud experience (Torino, Italy): an educational methodology through a collaborative and inclusive process. J. Prob. Based Learn. High. Educ. 8(1), 86–98 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Chen, S., Li, M., Ren, K., Fu, X., Qiao, C.: Rise of the indoor crowd: reconstruction of building interior view via mobile crowdsourcing. In: Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems SenSys 2015, pp. 59–71. Association for Computing Machinery, Inc. (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  25. C.I.R.C.O. Casa Irrinunciabile per la Ricreazione Civica e l’Ospitalità. https://laboratoriocirco.wordpress.com/2018/04/07/mappe/. last access 2023/04/03

  26. Careri, F., Finucci, F., Lucchetti, C., Monaco, S., Olcuire, S., Perini, E. (a cura di): CIRCO. Un Immaginario Di Città Ospitale, Edizioni Bordeaux, Roma (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tanner, S., Kalms, N., Cull, H., Matthewson, G.: Aisenberg, A.: Disruption and design: crowdmapping young women’s experience in cities. IDS Bullettin 51(2), 113-128 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Bartzokas-Tsiompras, A.: Utilizing OpenStreetMap data to measure and compare pedestrian street lengths in 992 cities around the world. Eur. J. Geogr. 13(2), 127–141 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Mazzoli, L., Antonioni, S.: Self mapping e social mapping: per uno sguardo personale e condiviso sul territorio. Sociologia della comunicazione 44, 9–24 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Boccia Artieri, G.: I media-mondo, Meltemi, Roma (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Miccoli, S., Finucci, F., Murro, R.: Measuring shared social appreciation of community goods: an experiment for the east elevated expressway of Rome. Sustainability 7(11), 15194–15218 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Goodchild, M.: Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal 69, 211–221 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-007-9111-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabrizio Finucci .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Finucci, F., Masanotti, A.G. (2023). Crowdmapping: Inclusive Cities and Evaluation. In: Gervasi, O., et al. Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2023 Workshops. ICCSA 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14112. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37129-5_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37129-5_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-37128-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-37129-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics