Abstract
Urban data analytics is helping to shape current and future cities, but the process of generating urban analytical indicators is often difficult to scale and automate. For instance, planners determine allowable Gross Floor Area (GFA) on a plot by manually cross-referencing multi-domain policies. As allowable GFA governs potential future developments, it is imperative to quantify and understand its values city-wide.
This paper presents the first steps of a research effort to develop an automated semantic spatial policy model to estimate allowable GFA for plots in Singapore. We use ontologies and Knowledge Graph (KG) platforms to address regulatory data interoperability and automation challenges. We filtered regulation concepts that determine buildable area and volume at Level of Detail 1 (LoD1) and standardised these concepts across different regulatory sources. Then, we modelled concept-related policies and automated the generation of possible GFA values per plot. Finally, we developed an ontology to store these values in a dynamic geospatial KG. Our approach presents two key benefits: 1) a generated dataset of allowable GFA eliminates the need for manual calculation by field experts, and 2) a graph data structure is ideally suited for unstructured regulatory data, like planning regulations.
We conclude that semantic spatial policy models improve the interoperability between multi-domain regulatory data and plan to generate a dataset for the entire Singapore as well as integrate regulatory data for mixed-use plots.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Massaro, E., Athanassiadis, A., Psyllidis, A., Binder, C.R.: Ontology-based integration of urban sustainability indicators. In: Binder, C.R., Massaro, E., Wyss, R. (eds.) Sustainability Assessment of Urban Systems, pp. 332–350. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2020). https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108574334
Wang, J., Biljecki, F.: Unsupervised machine learning in urban studies: a systematic review of applications. Cities 129 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103925
Biljecki, F., Chow, Y.S.: Global building morphology indicators. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 95 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2022.101809
Walczak, M.: A multi-dimensional spatial policy model for large-scale multi-municipal Swiss contexts. Environ. Plan. B: Urban Anal. City Sci. 48(9), 2675–2690 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808320985854
Fleischmann, M., Romice, O., Porta, S.: Measuring urban form: overcoming terminological inconsistencies for a quantitative and comprehensive morphologic analysis of cities. Environ. Plan. B: Urban Anal. City Sci. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808320910444
Kandt, J., Batty, M.: Smart cities, big data and urban policy: towards urban analytics for the long run. Cities 109 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102992
Psyllidis, A., Bozzon, A., Bocconi, S., Titos Bolivar, C.: A platform for urban analytics and semantic data integration in city planning. In: Celani, G., Sperling, D.M., Franco, J.M.S. (eds.) CAAD Futures 2015. CCIS, vol. 527, pp. 21–36. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47386-3_2
Zhang, Y., Schnabel, M.A.: A workflow of data integrating and parametric modelling in urban design regulation. In: The 51st International Conference of the ASA (2017)
Iwaniak, A., et al.: Semantic metadata for heterogeneous spatial planning documents. ISPRS IV-4-W1, 27–36 (2016). https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-4-W1-27-2016
Urban Redevelopment Authority. https://www.ura.gov.sg/Corporate/Planning/Long-Term-Plan-Review/Space-for-Our-Dreams-Exhibition. Accessed 29 Aug 2022
National Climate Change Secretoriat Singapore. https://www.nccs.gov.sg/singapores-climate-action/impact-of-climate-change-in-singapore/. Accessed 19 Feb 2023
Guler, D., Yomralioglu, T.: Reviewing the literature on the tripartite cycle containing digital building permit, 3D city modeling, and 3D property ownership. Land Use Policy 121 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106337
von Richthofen, A., Herthogs, P., Kraft, M., Cairns, S.: Semantic city planning systems (SCPS): a literature review. J. Plan. Lit. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1177/08854122211068526
Farazi, F., et al.: Knowledge graph approach to combustion chemistry and interoperability. ACS Omega 5, 18342–18348 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c02055
Chadzynski, A., et al.: Semantic 3D city agents - an intelligent automation for dynamic geospatial knowledge graphs. Energy AI 8 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyai.2022.100137
Smart Nation Singapore. https://www.smartnation.gov.sg//initiatives/transport/open-data-analytics. Accessed 05 Sept 2022
CHAOS. https://chaosarchitects.com/. Accessed 03 Sept 2022
GovTech. https://data.gov.sg/about. Accessed 31 Aug 2022
Wu, A.N., Biljecki, F.: Roofpedia: automatic mapping of green and solar roofs for an open roofscape registry and evaluation of urban sustainability. Landsc. Urban Plan. 214 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104167
CITYDATA.AI. https://univercity.ai/mobility-trip-patterns-for-greater-sydney-metropolitan-area/. Accessed 29 Aug 2022
Rudnicki, R.: An Overview of the Common Core Ontologies. CUBRC. Inc. (2016)
Grisiute, A., et al.: Unlocking urban simulation data with a semantic city planning system: ontologically representing and integrating MATSim output data in a knowledge graph. In: the 40th eCAADe Conference Proceedings, Belgium, vol. 2, pp. 257–267 (2022). https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.ecaade.2022.2.257
Schevers, H., Trinidad, G., Drogemuller, R.: Towards integrated assessments for urban development. ITcon 11, 225–236 (2006)
Borrmann, A., König, M., Koch, C., Beetz, J. (eds.): Building Information Modeling. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92862-3
Lee, H., Lee, S., Park, S., Lee, J.-K.: An approach to translate Korea building act into computer-readable form for automated design assessment. In: ISARC, Finland (2015)
Spacewalk. https://spacewalk.tech/. Accessed 15 Sept 2022
Beirão, J., Duarte, J.P., Stouffs, R.: Structuring a generative model for urban design: linking GIS to shape grammars. In: The 26th eCAADe Conference Proceedings, Belgium, pp. 929–938 (2008). https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.ecaade.2008.929
Grobler, F., et al.: Ontologies and shape grammars: communication between knowledge-based and generative systems. In: Gero, J.S., Goel, A.K. (eds.) Design Computing and Cognition 2008, pp. 23–40. Springer, Dordrecht (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8728-8_2
Silvennoinen, H., et al.: A semantic web approach to land use regulations in urban planning: the OntoZoning ontology of zones, land uses and programmes for Singapore. J. Urban Manag. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jum.2023.02.002. ISSN 2226-5856
Morosini, R., Zucaro, F.: Land use and urban sustainability assessment: a 3D-GIS application to a case study in Gozo city. Territ. Archit. 6(1), 1–20 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40410-019-0106-z
European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/measuring-code_en.pdf. Accessed 05 Oct 2022
Urban Redevelopment Authority. https://www.ura.gov.sg/Corporate/Guidelines/Development-Control/gross-floor-area/GFA/Advisory-Notes. Accessed 29 Aug 2022
Noardo, F., et al.: Tools for BIM-GIS integration (IFC georeferencing and conversions): results from the GeoBIM benchmark 2019. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 9(9) (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9090502. Art. no. 9
Urban Redevelopment Authority. https://www.ura.gov.sg/Corporate/Planning/Master-Plan. Accessed 05 Oct 2022
Chadzynski, A., et al.: Semantic 3D City Database - an enabler for a dynamic geospatial knowledge graph. Energy AI 6 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyai.2021.100106
Zlatanova, S., et al.: Spaces in spatial science and urban applications—State of the art review. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 9, 58 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9010058
Rijgersberg, H., van Assem, M., Top, J.: Ontology of units of measure and related concepts. Semant. Web 4, 3–13 (2013). https://doi.org/10.3233/SW-2012-0069
Arp, R., Smith, B., Spear, A.D.: Building Ontologies with Basic Formal Ontology, Cambridge, MA (2015). https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262527811.003.0005
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Grisiute, A. et al. (2023). A Semantic Spatial Policy Model to Automatically Calculate Allowable Gross Floor Areas in Singapore. In: Turrin, M., Andriotis, C., Rafiee, A. (eds) Computer-Aided Architectural Design. INTERCONNECTIONS: Co-computing Beyond Boundaries. CAAD Futures 2023. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1819. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37189-9_30
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37189-9_30
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-37188-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-37189-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)