Skip to main content

Bootless Application of Greedy Re-ranking Algorithms in Fair Neural Team Formation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Bias and Fairness in Information Retrieval (BIAS 2023)

Abstract

Team formation aims to automate forming teams of experts who can successfully solve difficult tasks, which have firsthand effects on creating organizational performance. While existing neural team formation methods are able to efficiently analyze massive collections of experts to form effective collaborative teams, they largely ignore the fairness in recommended teams of experts. Fairness breeds innovation and increases teams’ success by enabling a stronger sense of community, reducing conflict, and stimulating more creative thinking. In this paper, we study the application of state-of-the-art deterministic greedy re-ranking algorithms to mitigate the potential popularity bias in the neural team formation models based on demographic parity. Our experiments show that, first, neural team formation models are biased toward popular experts. Second, although deterministic re-ranking algorithms mitigate popularity bias substantially, they severely hurt the efficacy of teams. The code to reproduce the experiments reported in this paper is available at https://github.com/fani-lab/Adila/tree/bias23 (

, a feminine Arabic given name meaning just and fair.)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    business.linkedin.com/talent-solutions.

  2. 2.

    imdb.com/interfaces/.

References

  1. Horowitz, D., Kamvar, S.D.: The anatomy of a large-scale social search engine. In: WWW, pp. 431–440. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Horowitz, D., Kamvar, S.D.: Searching the village: models and methods for social search. Commun. ACM 55(4), 111–118 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bursic, K.M.: Strategies and benefits of the successful use of teams in manufacturing organizations. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage. 39(3), 277–289 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Askari, G., Asghri, N., Gordji, M.E., Asgari, H., Filipe, J.A., Azar, A.: The impact of teamwork on an organization’ performance: a cooperative game’ approach. Mathematics 8(10), 1–15 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Almagul, K., Nurul M.Z.: The effect of teamwork on employee productivity(2021)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Julie, Y.-W., Barbara, G., Charles, W.A., Amy, P.T.: The dynamics of multidisciplinary research teams in academia. Rev. High. Educ. 22(4), 425–440 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Erin, L.: From sole investigator to team scientist: trends in the practice and study of research collaboration. Annu. Rev. Soc. 42(1), 81–100 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hall, K.L., et al.: The science of team science: a review of the empirical evidence and research gaps on collaboration in science. Am. Psychol. 73, 532–548 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sherer, P.D.: Leveraging human assets in law firms: human capital structures and organizational capabilities. ILR Rev. 48(4), 671–691 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hu, J., Liden, R.C.: Making a difference in the teamwork: linking team prosocial motivation to team processes and effectiveness. Acad. Manag. J. 58, 1102–1127 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Craig, M., McKeown, D.: How to build effective teams in healthcare. Nurs. Times 111(14), 16–18 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rosen, M.A., et al.: Teamwork in healthcare: key discoveries enabling safer, high-quality care. Am. Psychol. 73(4), 433–450 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Swaab, R., Schaerer, M., Anicich, E.M., Ronay, R., Galinsky, A.D.: The too-much-talent effect: team interdependence determines when more talent is too much or not enough. Psychol. Sci. 25(8), 1581–1591 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rahmanniyay, F., Yu, A.J., Seif, J.: A multi-objective multi-stage stochastic model for project team formation under uncertainty in time requirements. Comput. Ind. Eng. 132, 153–165 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lappas, T., Liu, K., Terzi, E.: Finding a team of experts in social networks. In: SIGKDD 2009, pp. 467–476 ACM (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kargar, M., An, A.: Discovering top-k teams of experts with/without a leader in social networks. In: Proceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 985–994 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kargar, M., An, A.: Efficient top-k keyword search in graphs with polynomial delay. In: 2012 IEEE 28th International Conference on Data Engineering, pp. 1269–1272 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rad, R.H., Mitha, A., Fani, H., Kargar, M., Szlichta, J., Bagheri, E.: PyTFL: a python-based neural team formation toolkit. In: CIKM, pp. 4716–4720 ACM (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Dashti, A., Samet, S., Fani, H.: Effective neural team formation via negative samples. In: CIKM, pp. 3908–3912 ACM (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rad, R.H., Fani, H., Kargar, M., Szlichta, J., Bagheri, E.: Learning to form skill-based teams of experts. In: CIKM 2020, pp. 2049–2052. ACM (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Dwork, C., Hardt, M., Pitassi, T., Reingold, O., Zemel, R.S.: Fairness through awareness. In: Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science 2012, Cambridge, MA, USA, January 8–10, 2012, pp. 214–226. ACM (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hajian, S., Bonchi, F., Castillo, C.: Algorithmic Bias: from discrimination discovery to fairness-aware data mining. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, San Francisco, CA, USA, August 13–17, 2016, pp. 2125–2126. ACM (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Yalcin, E., Bilge, A.: Investigating and counteracting popularity bias in group recommendations. Inf. Process. Manag. 58(5), 102608 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhu, Z., He, Y., Zhao, X., Caverlee, J.: Popularity bias in dynamic recommendation. In: KDD, pp. 2439–2449. ACM (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sun, J., et al.: A framework for recommending accurate and diverse items using Bayesian graph convolutional neural networks. In: KDD, pp. 2030–2039. ACM (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kay, M., Matuszek, C., Munson, S.A.: Unequal representation and gender stereotypes in image search results for occupations. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2015, Seoul, Republic of Korea, April 18–23, 2015, pp. 3819–3828. ACM (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tannenbaum, C., Ellis, R.P., Eyssel, F., Zou, J., Schiebinger, L.: Sex and gender analysis improves science and engineering. Nature 575(7781), 137–146 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lauring, J., Villesèche, F.: The performance of gender diverse teams: what is the relation between diversity attitudes and degree of diversity? Eur. Manag. Rev. 16(2), 243–254 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hofstra, B., Kulkarni, V.V., Galvez, S.M.N., He, B., Jurafsky, D., McFarland, D.A.: The diversity-innovation paradox in science. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 117(17), 9284–9291 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Barnabò, G., Fazzone, A., Leonardi, S., Schwiegelshohn, C.: Algorithms for fair team formation in online labour marketplaces. In: WWW, pp. 484–490 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kargar, M., Golab, L., Srivastava, D., Szlichta, J., Zihayat, M.: Effective keyword search over weighted graphs. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 34(2), 601–616 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Geyik, S.C., Ambler, S., Kenthapadi, K.: Fairness-aware ranking in search recommendation systems with application to linkedin talent search. In: KDD, pp. 2221–2231. ACM (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Dwork, C., Hardt, M., Pitassi, T., Reingold, O., Zemel, R.: Fairness through awareness. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2012), pp. 214–226. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2012). https://doi.org/10.1145/2090236.2090255

  34. Dashti, A., Samet, S., Fani. H.: Effective neural team formation via negative samples. In: CIKM, pp. 3908–3912. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Le, Q., Mikolov, T.: Distributed representations of sentences and documents. In: ICML, ICML 2014, pp. II-1188–II-1196. JMLR.org (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hossein Fani .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Loghmani, H., Fani, H. (2023). Bootless Application of Greedy Re-ranking Algorithms in Fair Neural Team Formation. In: Boratto, L., Faralli, S., Marras, M., Stilo, G. (eds) Advances in Bias and Fairness in Information Retrieval. BIAS 2023. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1840. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37249-0_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37249-0_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-37248-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-37249-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics