Abstract
Creativity is one of the most awaited professional competences of their employees by modern entrepreneurs. Therefore, more and more importance are attached to the development and application of tools and methods supporting creativity both in the individual and team dimension. This became the main stimulus for the development of methods of creative thinking and problem solving. One of such methods, gaining more and more popularity, is Design Thinking. Despite the numerous advantages of this method, it should be realized that it cannot be used in every case. Therefore, the authors of this article defined the purpose of the article as: the use of semantic networks in the categorization of problems that can be solved with the use of Design Thinking. The research results presented in the article were obtained using triangulation of research methods such as: analytical literature review, computer simulation carried out using the Protégé program and a research experiment consisting in the simulation of selected problem situations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Barsalou, L.W.: Define design thinking. She Ji: The J. Des. Econ. Innovation 3(2), 102–105 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2017.10.007
Baruk, J.: Innowacje jako czynnik sukcesu organizacji. Zarządzanie i finanse 4(1), 7–16 (2013)
Cardoso, J., Pinto, A.M.: The Web Ontology Language (OWL) and its applications. In: Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology, Information Science Pub (2014). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-5888-2.ch756
Cross, N.: Design thinking: Understanding how designers think and work. Bloomsbury Publishing (2023)
den Dekker, T.: Design thinking. Routledge (2020)
Dorst, K.: The core of ‘design thinking’ and its application. Des. Stud. 32(6), 521–532 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2011.07.006
Dunne, D.: Design thinking at Work: How Innovative Organizations are Embracing Design. University of Toronto Press (2018)
Emami, M., Rezaei, S., Valaei, N., Gardener, J.: Creativity mindset as the organizational capability: the role of creativity-relevant processes, domain-relevant skills and intrinsic task motivation. Asia-Pacific J. Bus. Adm. 15(1), 139–160 (2023)
Krzepicka, A., Tarapata, J.: Innowacje jako czynnik budowania wzrostu wartości przedsiębiorstwa. Zeszyty Naukowe Wyższej Szkoły Humanitas. Zarządzanie 2, 74–89 (2012)
Lewrick, M., Link, P., Leifer, L.: The Design Thinking Toolbox: A Guide to Mastering the Most Popular and Valuable Innovation Methods. John Wiley & Sons (2020)
Matthews, B., Doherty, S., Worthy, P., Reid, J.: Design thinking, wicked problems and institutioning change: a case study. CoDesign 1–17 (2022)
Odlanicka-Poczobut, M.: Istota sieci semantycznych – pułapki i korzyści zastosowania w sądownictwie. Comp. Legilinguistics 40, 21–41 (2019). https://doi.org/10.14746/cl.2019.40.2
Parayitam, S., Usman, A.S., Olson, B.J., Shea, T.: Effect of emotional exhaustion and knowledge sharing on depersonalization, work accomplishment, and organizational performance. Int. J. Knowl. Manag. (IJKM) 18(1), 1–20 (2022). https://doi.org/10.4018/IJKM.291101
Parjanen, S.: Experiencing creativity in the organization: From individual creativity to collective creativity. Interdiscip. J. Inform., Know. Manag. 7, 109–128 (2012). https://doi.org/10.28945/1580
Reiter-Palmon, R. (ed.): Team creativity and Innovation. Oxford University Press (2017)
Runco, M.A., Pritzker, S.R. (eds.): Encyclopedia of creativity. Academic press (2020)
Torrance, P.: Verbal Tests. Forms A and B-Figural Tests, Forms A and B. The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking-Norms-Technical Manual Research Edition. Princeton, New Jersey: Personnel Press, p. 6 (1966).
Totawar, A.K., Nambudiri, R.: An overview of depersonalization in the organizational context. Indore Manage. J. 4(2), 64–72 (2012)
Wolcott, M.D., McLaughlin, J.E., Hubbard, D.K., Rider, T.R., Umstead, K.: Twelve tips to stimulate creative problem-solving with design thinking. Med. Teacher 43(5), 501–508 (2021)
Wolniak, R.: The design thinking method and its stages. Systemy Wspomagania w Inżynierii Produkcji 6(6), 247–255 (2017)
Wszołek, M., Moszczyński, K.: Algorytmizacja procesów projektowych. w: Grech, M. (red.) Communication Design: badanie i projektowanie komunikacji 4 Kraków, Libron, 2015, s. 173–195 (2015)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Chomiak-Orsa, I., Greńczuk, A., Łuczak, K. (2023). The Use of the Semantic Network for Categorization of Problems Solved by Design Thinking. In: Chandran K R, S., N, S., A, B., Hamead H, S. (eds) Computational Intelligence in Data Science. ICCIDS 2023. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 673. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38296-3_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38296-3_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-38295-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-38296-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)
