Skip to main content

Adaptivity Gap for Influence Maximization with Linear Threshold Model on Trees

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Frontiers of Algorithmics (IJTCS-FAW 2023)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 13933))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 231 Accesses

Abstract

We address the problem of influence maximization within the framework of the linear threshold model, focusing on its comparison to the independent cascade model. Previous research has predominantly concentrated on the independent cascade model, providing various bounds on the adaptivity gap in influence maximization. For the case of a (directed) tree (in-arborescence and out-arborescence), [CP19] and [DPV23] have established constant upper and lower bounds for the independent cascade model.

However, the adaptivity gap of this problem on the linear threshold model is not so extensively studied as on the independent cascade model. In this study, we present constant upper bounds for the adaptivity gap of the linear threshold model on trees. Our approach builds upon the original findings within the independent cascade model and employs a reduction technique to deduce an upper bound of \(\frac{4e^2}{e^2-1}\) for the in-arborescence scenario. For out-arborescence, the equivalence between the two models reveals that the adaptivity gap under the linear threshold model falls within the range of \([\frac{e}{e-1},2]\), as demonstrated in [CP19] under the independent cascade model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Another commonly considered model is called the myopic feedback model, where only one iteration of the spread can be observed.

References

  1. Asadpour, A., Nazerzadeh, H.: Maximizing stochastic monotone submodular functions. Manage. Sci. 62(8), 2374–2391 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen, W., Peng, B.: On adaptivity gaps of influence maximization under the independent cascade model with full adoption feedback. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.01707 (2019)

  3. Chen, W., Peng, B., Schoenebeck, G., Tao, B.: Adaptive greedy versus non-adaptive greedy for influence maximization. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 74, 303–351 (2022)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. D’Angelo, G., Poddar, D., Vinci, C.: Better bounds on the adaptivity gap of influence maximization under full-adoption feedback. Artif. Intell. 318, 103895 (2023)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Domingos, P., Richardson, M.: Mining the network value of customers. In: Proceedings of the Seventh ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 57–66 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Golovin, D., Krause, A.: Adaptive submodularity: theory and applications in active learning and stochastic optimization. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 42, 427–486 (2011)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Kempe, D., Kleinberg, J., Tardos, É.: Maximizing the spread of influence through a social network. In: Proceedings of the Ninth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 137–146 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kempe, D., Kleinberg, J., Tardos, É.: Influential nodes in a diffusion model for social networks. In: Caires, L., Italiano, G.F., Monteiro, L., Palamidessi, C., Yung, M. (eds.) ICALP 2005. LNCS, vol. 3580, pp. 1127–1138. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/11523468_91

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Mossel, E., Roch, S.: Submodularity of influence in social networks: from local to global. SIAM J. Comput. 39(6), 2176–2188 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Nemhauser, G.L., Wolsey, L.A., Fisher, M.L.: An analysis of approximations for maximizing submodular set functions-I. Math. Program. 14, 265–294 (1978)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Peng, B., Chen, W.: Adaptive influence maximization with myopic feedback. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems vol. 32 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Richardson, M., Domingos, P.: Mining knowledge-sharing sites for viral marketing. In: Proceedings of the Eighth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 61–70 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Schoenebeck, G., Tao, B.: Influence maximization on undirected graphs: toward closing the (1–1/e) gap. ACM Trans. Econ. Comput. (TEAC) 8(4), 1–36 (2020)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Schoenebeck, G., Tao, B., Yu, F.-Y.: Limitations of greed: influence maximization in undirected networks re-visited. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems, pp. 1224–1232 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research of K. Yang is supported by the NSFC grant No. 62102253. Y. Tao, S. Wang and K. Yang sincerely thank the anonymous reviewers for their helpful feedback. Y. Tao, S. Wang and K. Yang also want to express the gratitude to Panfeng Liu and Biaoshuai Tao for their insightful suggestions during the composition of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kuan Yang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Tao, Y., Wang, S., Yang, K. (2023). Adaptivity Gap for Influence Maximization with Linear Threshold Model on Trees. In: Li, M., Sun, X., Wu, X. (eds) Frontiers of Algorithmics. IJTCS-FAW 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13933. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39344-0_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39344-0_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-39343-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-39344-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics