Skip to main content

An Axiom System for Basic Hybrid Logic with Propositional Quantifiers

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Logic, Language, Information, and Computation (WoLLIC 2023)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 13923))

  • 206 Accesses

Abstract

We present an axiom system for basic hybrid logic extended with propositional quantifiers (a second-order extension of basic hybrid logic) and prove its (basic and pure) strong completeness with respect to general models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See, in particular, the technical papers in the new edition of his book Papers on Time and Tense [17], and the posthumous volume Worlds, Times and Selves [20].

  2. 2.

    This negative result (and others) were proved in Kit Fine’s pioneering 1970 paper [11] (though the paper also contains an interesting positive result: extending ordinary S5 with propositional quantification using standard frames yields a decidable logic). For some sharper negative results see [13].

  3. 3.

    There is more to general frames that this: they can also be viewed as representations of modal algebras; see Chap. 5 of [6] for details. Both lines of work stem from a classic paper by S. K. Thomason [21]. This links general frames and modal algebras, and shows that (a) there are Priorean tense logics that are not complete with respect to any class of frames, that (b) every Priorean tense logic is complete with respect to a class of general frames. That is: general frames “tame” frame validity.

  4. 4.

    Several such systems have been explored; see [1, 5] for more. Here we follow [6].

  5. 5.

    Note that on standard models we could drop the restriction prohibiting substitution of quantified formulas as standard models admit all subsets of the frame as propositions. That is, the rule which permits any soft substitution is sound on standard models. However this does not lead to a completeness result for standard models, as (thanks to Kit Fine’s results [11]) we know that the set of all standard validities on the class of all standard models is not recursively enumerable.

  6. 6.

    Namely: “Tense logic and the logic of earlier and later”, and “Quasi-propositions and quasi-individuals”, both of which can be found in the first edition of Papers on Time and Tense [16]. The new edition [17] contains several more papers that build on these two, including “Egocentric logic”. See Kofod’s PhD thesis [14] for further discussion.

References

  1. Areces, C., ten Cate, B.: Hybrid logic. In: Handbook of Modal Logic, pp. 821–868. Elsevier (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D., Patel-Schneider, P., Nardi, D., et al.: The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Belardinelli, F., Van Der Hoek, W., Kuijer, L.B.: Second-order propositional modal logic: expressiveness and completeness results. Artif. Intell. 263, 3–45 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Blackburn, P.: Arthur Prior and hybrid logic. Synthese 150(3), 329–372 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Blackburn, P., ten Cate, B.: Pure extensions, proof rules, and hybrid axiomatics. Stud. Logica. 84, 277–322 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Blackburn, P., de Rijke, M., Venema, Y.: Modal Logic. Cambridge University Press, Press (2001)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Blackburn, P.R., Braüner, T., Kofod, J.L.: Remarks on hybrid modal logic with propositional quantfiers. In: The Metaphysics of Time: Themes from Prior, pp. 401–426. Aalborg Universitetsforlag (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Braüner, T.: Hybrid Logic. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, summer 2017 edn. (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bull, R.: On modal logic with propositional quantifiers. J. Symbolic Logic 34(2), 257–263 (1969)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Copeland, B.J.: Arthur Prior. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, Summer 2017 edn. (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fine, K.: Propositional quantifiers in modal logic. Theoria 36, 336–346 (1970)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Henkin, L.: Completeness in the theory of types. J. Symbolic Logic 15(2), 81–91 (1950)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kaminski, M., Tiomkin, M.: The expressive power of second-order propositional modal logic. Notre Dame J. Formal Logic 37(1), 35–43 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kofod, J.L.: What on earth was Arthur Prior thinking?: About physics and hybrid logic. Ph.D. thesis, IKH, Roskilde University (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Øhrstrøm, P., Hasle, P.: Temporal Logic: from Ancient Ideas to Artificial Intelligence, vol. 57. Springer, Dordrecht (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-585-37463-5

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Prior, A.: Papers on Time and Tense. Oxford University Press (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Prior, A.: Papers on Time and Tense. Oxford University Press, new edn. (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Prior, A.N.: Epimenides the Cretan. J Symbolic Logic 23(3), 261–266 (1958)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Prior, A.N.: On a family of paradoxes. Notre Dame J. Formal Logic 2(1), 16–32 (1961)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Prior, A.N., Fine, K.: Worlds, Times, and Selves. Duckworth, London (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Thomason, S.: Semantic analysis of tense logics. J. Symbolic Logic 37, 150–158 (1972)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Antje Rumberg and the three anonymous referees for their comments and corrections on earlier versions of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Torben Braüner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Blackburn, P., Braüner, T., Kofod, J.L. (2023). An Axiom System for Basic Hybrid Logic with Propositional Quantifiers. In: Hansen, H.H., Scedrov, A., de Queiroz, R.J. (eds) Logic, Language, Information, and Computation. WoLLIC 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13923. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39784-4_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39784-4_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-39783-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-39784-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics