Skip to main content

SPoiL: Sybil-Based Untargeted Data Poisoning Attacks inĀ Federated Learning

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Network and System Security (NSS 2023)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 13983))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Federated learning is widely used in mobile computing, the Internet of Things, and other scenarios due to its distributed and privacy-preserving nature. It allows mobile devices to train machine learning models collaboratively without sharing their local private data. However, during the model aggregation phase, federated learning is vulnerable to poisoning attacks carried out by malicious users. Furthermore, due to the heterogeneity of network status, communication conditions, hardware, and other factors, users are at high risk of offline, which allows attackers to fake virtual participants and increase the damage of poisoning. Unlike existing work, we focus on the more general case of untargeted poisoning attacks. In this paper, we propose novel sybil-based untargeted data poisoning attacks in federated learning (SPoiL), in which malicious users corrupt the performance of the global model by modifying the training data and increasing the probability of poisoning by virtualizing several sybil nodes. Finally, we validate the superiority of our attack approach through experiments across the commonly used datasets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bonawitz, K., et al.: Towards federated learning at scale: system design. Proc. Mach. Learn. Syst. 1, 374ā€“388 (2019). https://proceedings.mlsys.org/paper/2019/hash/bd686fd640be98efaae0091fa301e613-Abstract.html

  2. Bonawitz, K., et al.: Practical secure aggregation for privacy-preserving machine learning. In: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, CCS 2017, pp. 1175ā€“1191. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3133956.3133982

  3. Cao, D., Chang, S., Lin, Z., Liu, G., Sun, D.: Understanding distributed poisoning attack in federated learning. In: 2019 IEEE 25th International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Systems (ICPADS), pp. 233ā€“239. IEEE (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPADS47876.2019.00042

  4. Cao, D., Chang, S., Lin, Z., Liu, G., Sun, D.: Understanding distributed poisoning attack in federated learning. In: 2019 IEEE 25th International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Systems (ICPADS), pp. 233ā€“239 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPADS47876.2019.00042

  5. Douceur, J.R.: The Sybil attack. In: Druschel, P., Kaashoek, F., Rowstron, A. (eds.) IPTPS 2002. LNCS, vol. 2429, pp. 251ā€“260. Springer, Heidelberg (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45748-8_24

    ChapterĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  6. Jamali-Rad, H., Abdizadeh, M., Singh, A.: Federated learning with taskonomy for non-IID data. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst., 1ā€“12 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2022.3152581

  7. Kaggle fake news dataset. https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/fake-news/data

  8. Kourtellis, N., Katevas, K., Perino, D.: Flaas: federated learning as a service. In: Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Distributed Machine Learning, DistributedML 2020, pp. 7ā€“13. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3426745.3431337

  9. KreÅ”ÅˆĆ”kovĆ”, V.M., SarnovskĆ½, M., Butka, P.: Deep learning methods for fake news detection. In: 2019 IEEE 19th International Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Informatics and 7th IEEE International Conference on Recent Achievements in Mechatronics, Automation, Computer Sciences and Robotics (CINTI-MACRo), pp. 000143ā€“000148 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/CINTI-MACRo49179.2019.9105317

  10. McMahan, B., Ramage, D.: Federated Learning: Collaborative Machine Learning without Centralized Training Data (2017). https://ai.googleblog.com/2017/04/federated-learning-collaborative.html

  11. Nuding, F., Mayer, R.: Data poisoning in sequential and parallel federated learning. In: Proceedings of the 2022 ACM on International Workshop on Security and Privacy Analytics, IWSPA 2022, pp. 24ā€“34. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2022). https://doi.org/10.1145/3510548.3519372

  12. Sagar, S., Li, C.S., Loke, S.W., Choi, J.: Poisoning attacks and defenses in federated learning: a survey. arXiv (Jan 2023). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2301.05795

  13. Sharma, P.K., Park, J.H., Cho, K.: Blockchain and federated learning-based distributed computing defence framework for sustainable society. Sustain. Cities Soc. 59, 102220 (2020)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  14. Shejwalkar, V., Houmansadr, A., Kairouz, P., Ramage, D.: Back to the drawing board: a critical evaluation of poisoning attacks on production federated learning. In: 2022 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP), pp. 1354ā€“1371 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/SP46214.2022.9833647

  15. Shejwalkar, V., Houmansadr, A., Kairouz, P., Ramage, D.: Back to the drawing board: a critical evaluation of poisoning attacks on production federated learning. In: 2022 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP), pp. 1354ā€“1371. IEEE (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/SP46214.2022.9833647

  16. Tahir, M., Ali, M.I.: On the performance of federated learning algorithms for IoT. IoT 3(2), 273ā€“284 (2022)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  17. Tolpegin, V., Truex, S., Gursoy, M.E., Liu, L.: Data poisoning attacks against federated learning systems. In: Chen, L., Li, N., Liang, K., Schneider, S. (eds.) ESORICS 2020. LNCS, vol. 12308, pp. 480ā€“501. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58951-6_24

    ChapterĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  18. Wang, H., Kaplan, Z., Niu, D., Li, B.: Optimizing federated learning on non-IID data with reinforcement learning. In: IEEE INFOCOM 2020-IEEE Conference on Computer Communications, pp. 1698ā€“1707. IEEE (2020)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  19. Zhao, Y., Li, M., Lai, L., Suda, N., Civin, D., Chandra, V.: Federated learning with non-IID data. arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.00582 (2018)

  20. Zhou, X., Xu, M., Wu, Y., Zheng, N.: Deep model poisoning attack on federated learning. Future Internet 13(3), 73 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/fi13030073, https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/13/3/73

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work was partially supported by JSPS Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) 23K11103 and NEC C &C Foundation under Grants for Researchers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chunhua Su .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

Ā© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Lian, Z., Zhang, C., Nan, K., Su, C. (2023). SPoiL: Sybil-Based Untargeted Data Poisoning Attacks inĀ Federated Learning. In: Li, S., Manulis, M., Miyaji, A. (eds) Network and System Security. NSS 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13983. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39828-5_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39828-5_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-39827-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-39828-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics