Skip to main content

A Knowledge-Based Approach to Business Process Analysis: From Informal to Formal

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Database and Expert Systems Applications (DEXA 2023)

Abstract

Business Process Analysis (BPA) is a strategic activity, necessary for enterprises to model their business operations. It is a central activity in information system development, but also for business process design and reengineering. Despite several decades of research, the effectiveness of available BPA methods is still questionable. The majority of methodologies adopted by enterprises are rather qualitative and lack a formal basis, often yielding inadequate specifications. On the other hand, there are methodologies with a solid theoretical background, but they appear too cumbersome for the majority of enterprises. This paper proposes a knowledge framework, referred to as BPA Canvas, conceived to be easily mastered by business people and, at the same time, based on a sound formal theory. The methodology starts with the construction of natural language knowledge artifacts and, then, progressively guides the user toward more rigorous structures. The formal approach of the methodology allows us to prove the correctness of the resulting knowledge base while maintaining the centrality of business people in the whole knowledge construction process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.thefreedictionary.com/.

  2. 2.

    For sake of precision, each BPKB that is built is an interpretation of the axiomatic definitions that, together with the correctness rules, allows for checking if the BPKB at hand is actually a correct interpretation, i.e., a model of our theory.

References

  1. Aguilar-Savén, R.S.: Business process modelling: review and framework. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 90(2), 129–149 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(03)00102-6, production Planning and Control

  2. Álvez, J., Gonzalez-Dios, I., Rigau, G.: Applying the closed world assumption to SUMO-based FOL ontologies for effective commonsense reasoning. In: ECAI 2020. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, vol. 325, pp. 585–592. IOS Press (2020). https://doi.org/10.3233/FAIA200142

  3. Andersson, B., et al.: Towards a reference ontology for business models. In: Embley, D.W., Olivé, A., Ram, S. (eds.) ER 2006. LNCS, vol. 4215, pp. 482–496. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/11901181_36

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Aversano, L., Grasso, C., Tortorella, M.: A Literature review of business/IT alignment strategies. Procedia Technol. 5, 462–474 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2012.09.051, 4th Conference of ENTERprise Information Systems - aligning technology, organizations and people (CENTERIS 2012)

  5. Di Martino, B., Colucci Cante, L., Esposito, A., Graziano, M.: A tool for the semantic annotation, validation and optimization of business process models. Softw. Pract. Exp. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/spe.3184

  6. Hepp, M., Leymann, F., Domingue, J., Wahler, A., Fensel, D.: Semantic business process management: a vision towards using semantic web services for business process management, vol. 2005, pp. 535–540 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEBE.2005.110

  7. Koutsopoulos, G., Bider, I.: Business process canvas as a process model in a nutshell. In: Gulden, J., Reinhartz-Berger, I., Schmidt, R., Guerreiro, S., Guédria, W., Bera, P. (eds.) BPMDS/EMMSAD -2018. LNBIP, vol. 318, pp. 49–63. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91704-7_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Martin, J.: Managing the Data Base Environment, 1st edn. Prentice Hall PTR, USA (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Missikoff, M.: A knowledge-driven business process analysis methodology. In: Strauss, C., Cuzzocrea, A., Kotsis, G., Tjoa, A.M., Khalil, I. (eds.) Database and Expert Systems Applications. DEXA 2022. LNCS, vol. 13427, pp. 62–67. Springer, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-12426-6_5

  10. Missikoff, M., Assogna, P.: The BIVEE Project: An Overview of Methodology and Tools (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119145622.ch3

  11. Pedrinaci, C., Domingue, J., Alves de Medeiros, A.K.: A core ontology for business process analysis. In: Bechhofer, S., Hauswirth, M., Hoffmann, J., Koubarakis, M. (eds.) ESWC 2008. LNCS, vol. 5021, pp. 49–64. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68234-9_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Pigneur, Y., Osterwalder, A.: Business Model Generation: A Handbook for Visionaries, Game Changers and Challengers. John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Prakash, R., Agarwal, N.: Managing business analysis for agile development. Int. J. Mod. Eng. Res. (IJMER) 3(3), 1393–1395 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Roy, S., Sawant, K.P., Ghose, A.K.: Ontology modeling of UBL process diagrams using owl, pp. 535–540 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/CISIM.2010.5643509

  15. van Grembergen, W., De Haes, S.: A Research Journey into Enterprise Governance of IT, Business/IT Alignment and Value Creation, pp. 1–13, January 2010. https://doi.org/10.4018/jitbag.2010120401

  16. Vergidis, K., Tiwari, A., Maieed, B.: Business process analysis and optimization: beyond reengineering. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C Appl. Rev. 38(1), 69–82 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCC.2007.905812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Von Rosing, M., Laurier, W.P., Polovina, S.M.: The BPM ontology, vol. 1 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-799959-3.00007-0

  18. Värk, A., Reino, A.: Practice ecology of knowledge management-connecting the formal, informal and personal. J. Doc. 77(1), 163–180 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-03-2020-0043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. W3C Recommendation: Universal business language v2.0. Technical report, W3C (2006). http://docs.oasis-open.org/ubl/cs-UBL-2.0/UBL-2.0.htm

  20. Wen, P., Wang, R.: Does knowledge structure matter? Key factors influencing formal and informal knowledge sharing in manufacturing. J. Knowl. Manag. 26(9), 2275–2305 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-06-2021-0478

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

We gratefully acknowledge the partial support of the PNRR MUR project PE0000013-FAIR.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonio De Nicola .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

De Nicola, A., Formica, A., Mele, I., Missikoff, M., Taglino, F. (2023). A Knowledge-Based Approach to Business Process Analysis: From Informal to Formal. In: Strauss, C., Amagasa, T., Kotsis, G., Tjoa, A.M., Khalil, I. (eds) Database and Expert Systems Applications. DEXA 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14146. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39847-6_39

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39847-6_39

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-39846-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-39847-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics