Skip to main content

Web Browser Forensics: A Comparative Integrated Approach on Artefacts Acquisition, Evidence Collections and Analysis of Google Chrome, Firefox and Brave Browser

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computing Science, Communication and Security (COMS2 2023)

Abstract

Web browser is the important application and majority user users use web browsers to access the social media sites, email application, web search engines, ecommerce sites and download the video or photos. Various web browsers are available in the market for this purpose but Google chrome, Mozilla Firefox and Brave are the well-known browser application. These web browsers might be use for normal internet access also use to committee the crime. In such case it is important to use digital forensics techniques to extract evidences which will be produced to court to prove the crime. Literature survey shows that dead forensics were frequently used by researchers but very less work is carried out to use live or RAM forensics to extract the evidences. In this research paper, we created real time scenario with Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox and Brave browser and use RAM forensics techniques to extract the evidences related to web browser activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ohana, D.J., Shashidhar, N.: Do private and portable web browsers leave incriminating evidence?: a forensic analysis of residual artifacts from private and portable web browsing sessions. EURASIP J. Inf. Secur. 2013, 6 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Marrington, A., Baggili, I., Al Ismail, T., Al Kaf, A.: Portable web browser forensics: a forensic examination of the privacy benefits of portable web browsers. In: 2012 International Conference on Computer Systems and Industrial Informatics, pp. 18–20 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Oh, J., Lee, S., Lee, S.: Advanced evidence collection and analysis of web browser activity. Digit. Invest. 8, S62–S70 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Said, H., Al Mutawa, N., Al Awadhi, I., Guimaraes, M.: Forensic analysis of private browsing artifacts. In: 2011 International Conference on Innovations in Information Technology, pp.25–27 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rathod, D.: Web browser forensics: google chrome. Int. J. Adv. Res. Comput. Sci. 8(7), 896–899 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Akbal, E., Günes, F., Akbal, A.: Digital forensic analyses of web browser records. J. Softw. 11(7), 631–637 (2016). Accessed 10 Mar 2020. https://doi.org/10.17706/jsw.11.7.631-637

  7. Amor. L, Thabet S.: Forensics investigation of web application security attacks. Int. J. Comput. Netw. Inf. Secur. 7, 10–17 (2015). https://doi.org/10.5815/ijcnis.2015.03.02. Accessed 10 Mar 2020

  8. Oh, J., Lee, S., Lee, S.: Advanced evidence collection and analysis of web browser activity. In: The Digital Forensic Research Conference, 2001 USA (2020). Accessed 17 Mar 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diin.2011.05.008

  9. “Basis Technology Corporation: Autopsy and The Sleuth”, Accessed 14 Mar 2020. http://www.autopsy.com/wpcontent/uploads/sites/8/2016/02/Autopsy-4.0-EN-optimized.pdf

  10. Mohammmed, S., Sridevi, R.: A survey on digital forensics phases, tools and challenges. In: Raju, K., Govardhan, A., Rani, B., Sridevi, R., Murty, M. (eds) Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Informatics. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 1090, pp. 237–248. Springer, Singapore (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1480-7_20

  11. Aminnezhad, A., Dehghantanha, A., Abdullah, M.T.: A survey on privacy issues in digital forensics. Int. J. Cyber-Secur. Digit. Forensics 1(4), 311–324 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. https://kinsta.com/browser-market-share/. Accessed 5 Dec 2022

  13. https://www.forbes.com/sites/billybambrough/2020/04/09/billions-of-google-chrome-usersnow-have-another-surprising-option/?sh=58f2bdd45956. Accessed 5 Dec 2022

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Digvijaysinh Rathod .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sanghvi, H., Patel, V.J., Shah, R., Shukla, P., Rathod, D. (2023). Web Browser Forensics: A Comparative Integrated Approach on Artefacts Acquisition, Evidence Collections and Analysis of Google Chrome, Firefox and Brave Browser. In: Chaubey, N., Thampi, S.M., Jhanjhi, N.Z., Parikh, S., Amin, K. (eds) Computing Science, Communication and Security. COMS2 2023. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1861. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40564-8_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40564-8_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-40563-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-40564-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics