Abstract
Quantum computing is a rapidly progressing field: quantum computers are becoming more powerful and an increasing number of functionalities are offered via various quantum platforms and quantum software packages. Current quantum computers can be used almost exclusively via cloud services. It is expected that this will remain the case, at least in the near-term future. For successful adoption of quantum computing by the market, quantum cloud services should be user-centric. To that end, we explore quantum cloud computing from a user perspective. We describe a standardised overview of quantum cloud computing as a whole to create a common language to strengthen research and collaboration on quantum cloud computing. Specifically, we identify different types, information flows and relevant user functionalities of quantum cloud computing, based on their counterparts in classical cloud computing. Combined, this gives an overview of quantum cloud computing for the best user experience, paving the way towards user-centric quantum cloud computing.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alexander, T., et al.: Qiskit pulse: programming quantum computers through the cloud with pulses. Quantum Sci. Technol. 5(4), 044006 (020). https://doi.org/10.1088/2058-9565/aba404
Alhambra: The quantum ecosystem that overcomes knowledge barriers (2021). https://www.alhambrait.com/en/products/qpath/
Amazon: Amazon braket. https://aws.amazon.com/braket/
Amazon Web Services: AWS HPC. https://aws.amazon.com/hpc/
Apple Inc.: iCloud. https://icloud.com/
Arrighi, P., Salvail, L.: Blind quantum computation. Int. J. Quantum Inf. 04(05), 883–898 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219749906002171
Barz, S., Kashefi, E., Broadbent, A., Fitzsimons, J.F., Zeilinger, A., Walther, P.: Demonstration of blind quantum computing. Science 335(6066), 303–308 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1214707
van den Brink, R.F., Neumann, N.M.P., Phillipson, F.: Vision on next level quantum software tooling. In: 11th International Conference on Future Computational Technologies and Applications, pp. 16–23 (2019)
Chellappa, R.: Intermediaries in cloud-computing: a new computing paradigm. In: INFORMS Annual Meeting, Dallas, pp. 26–29 (1997)
Cicconetti, C., Conti, M., Passarella, A.: Resource allocation in quantum networks for distributed quantum computing. In: 2022 IEEE International Conference on Smart Computing (SMARTCOMP), pp. 124–132 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/SMARTCOMP55677.2022.00032
Classiq: Designing and implementing quantum algorithms with functional level programming (2023). https://www.classiq.io/docs/functional-level-programming-basics
Cojocaru, A., Colisson, L., Kashefi, E., Wallden, P.: On the possibility of classical client blind quantum computing. Cryptography 5(1), 3 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/cryptography5010003
Corcoles, A.D., et al.: Challenges and opportunities of near-term quantum computing systems. Proc. IEEE. 108(8), 1338–1352 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/jproc.2019.2954005
Cross, A.W., Bishop, L.S., Sheldon, S., Nation, P.D., Gambetta, J.M.: Validating quantum computers using randomized model circuits. Phys. Rev. A 100, 032328 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.100.032328
D-Wave Systems: Hybrid solver for discrete quadratic models (2020). https://www.dwavesys.com/media/ssidd1x3/14-1050a-a_hybrid_solver_for_discrete_quadratic_models.pdf
D-Wave Systems: DWave-ocean-SDK (2021). https://github.com/dwavesystems/dwave-ocean-sdk
van Deventer, O., et al.: Towards European standards for quantum technologies. EPJ Quantum Technol. 9(1), 33 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjqt/s40507-022-00150-1
Dropbox: Dropbox. https://www.dropbox.com/
Feld, S., et al.: A hybrid solution method for the capacitated vehicle routing problem using a quantum annealer. Front. ICT 6, 13 (2019)
Fingerhuth, M., Babej, T., Wittek, P.: Open source software in quantum computing. PLoS ONE 13(12), e0208561 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208561
IBM Quantum: IBM Quantum Experience (2021). https://quantum-computing.ibm.com/
IDM: Types of cloud services. Medium (2018). https://medium.com/@IDMdatasecurity/types-of-cloud-services-b54e5b574f6
Kadowaki, T., Nishimori, H.: Quantum annealing in the transverse Ising model. Phys. Rev. E 58, 5355–5363 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.58.5355
Kaiiali, M., Sezer, S., Khalid, A.: Cloud computing in the quantum era. In: 2019 IEEE Conference on Communications and Network Security (CNS), pp. 1–4 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/CNS44998.2019.8952589
Kavis, M.: The cloud’s lock-in vs. agility trade-off. https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/pages/consulting/articles/cloud-vendor-lock-in-deloitte-on-cloud-blog.html
Khammassi, N., Guerreschi, G.G., Ashraf, I., Hogaboam, J.W., Almudever, C.G., Bertels, K.: cqasm v1.0: Towards a common quantum assembly language (2018)
Lanfear, T., Hitchcock, A.M., Berry, D.: Shared responsibility in the cloud - microsoft azure (2022). https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/security/fundamentals/shared-responsibility
Lubinski, T., et al.: Application-oriented performance benchmarks for quantum computing (2021)
Martiel, S., Ayral, T., Allouche, C.: Benchmarking quantum coprocessors in an application-centric, hardware-agnostic, and scalable way. IEEE Trans. Quantum Eng. 2, 1–11 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/tqe.2021.3090207
Mell, P., Grance, T.: The NIST definition of cloud computing (2011). https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.800-145
Microsoft: Azure quantum. https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/services/quantum/
Microsoft: Office Online. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/
Möller, M., Schalkers, M.: Libket: A cross-platform programming framework for quantum-accelerated scientific computing. In: Krzhizhanovskaya, V.V., Závodszky, G., Lees, M.H., Dongarra, J.J., Sloot, P.M.A., Brissos, S., Teixeira, J. (eds.) Computational Science - ICCS 2020, pp. 451–464. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50433-5_35
Neukart, F., Compostella, G., Seidel, C., Von Dollen, D., Yarkoni, S., Parney, B.: Traffic flow optimization using a quantum annealer. Front. ICT 4, 29 (2017)
Nielsen, M.A., Chuang, I.L.: Quantum Computation and Quantum Information: 10th Anniversary Edition. Cambridge University Press (2010). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511976667
O’Brien, J.L.: Optical quantum computing. Science. 318(5856), 1567–1570 (2007). http://www.jstor.org/stable/20051746
Owen, E.: Quantum cloud computing - Cambridge consultants on how to make it happen (2023). https://www.cambridgeconsultants.com/us/insights/opinion/quantum-cloud-computing
PCMag: Cloud computing (2023). https://www.pcmag.com/encyclopedia/term/cloud-computing
Phillipson, F., Neumann, N., Wezeman, R.: Classification of hybrid quantum-classical computing (2022). https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2210.15314
QuTech: Quantum inspire home. https://www.quantum-inspire.com/ (2018)
Saleem, Z.H., Tomesh, T., Perlin, M.A., Gokhale, P., Suchara, M.: Divide and conquer for combinatorial optimization and distributed quantum computation (2021). https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2107.07532
Salm, M., Barzen, J., Breitenbücher, U., Leymann, F., Weder, B., Wild, K.: The NISQ analyzer: Automating the selection of quantum computers for quantum algorithms. In: Service-Oriented Computing, pp. 66–85. Springer International Publishing (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64846-6_5
van der Schoot, W.E., Wezeman, R.S., Eendebak, P.T., Neumann, N.M.P., Phillipson, F.: Evaluating three levels of quantum metrics on quantum-inspire hardware. (unpublished)
Shor, P.: Algorithms for quantum computation: Discrete logarithms and factoring. In: Proceedings 35th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (1994). https://doi.org/10.1109/sfcs.1994.365700
Singh, H., Sachdev, A.: The quantum way of cloud computing. In: 2014 International Conference on Reliability Optimization and Information Technology (ICROIT), pp. 397–400 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICROIT.2014.6798362
Smith, R.S., Curtis, M.J., Zeng, W.J.: A practical quantum instruction set architecture (2016)
Treinish, M., et al.: Qiskit/qiskit: Qiskit 0.42.1 (2023). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7757946
Vasudevan, T.: Bluebleed leak proves again, not all cloud service providers are secure, https://www.skyhighsecurity.com/en-us/about/newsroom/blogs/industry-perspectives/bluebleed-leak-proves-it-again-you-cannot-assume-cloud-service-providers-are-secure.html
White, J.E.: Network Specifications for Remote Job Entry and Remote Job Output Retrieval at UCSB. RFC 105 (1971). https://doi.org/10.17487/RFC0105
Wray, J.: Where’s the rub: Cloud computing’s hidden costs (2014). https://www.forbes.com/sites/centurylink/2014/02/27/wheres-the-rub-cloud-computings-hidden-costs/
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Neumann, N.M.P., van der Schoot, W., Sijpesteijn, T. (2023). Quantum Cloud Computing from a User Perspective. In: Krieger, U.R., Eichler, G., Erfurth, C., Fahrnberger, G. (eds) Innovations for Community Services. I4CS 2023. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1876. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40852-6_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40852-6_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-40851-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-40852-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)