Skip to main content

Quantum Cloud Computing from a User Perspective

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Innovations for Community Services (I4CS 2023)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1876))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 217 Accesses

Abstract

Quantum computing is a rapidly progressing field: quantum computers are becoming more powerful and an increasing number of functionalities are offered via various quantum platforms and quantum software packages. Current quantum computers can be used almost exclusively via cloud services. It is expected that this will remain the case, at least in the near-term future. For successful adoption of quantum computing by the market, quantum cloud services should be user-centric. To that end, we explore quantum cloud computing from a user perspective. We describe a standardised overview of quantum cloud computing as a whole to create a common language to strengthen research and collaboration on quantum cloud computing. Specifically, we identify different types, information flows and relevant user functionalities of quantum cloud computing, based on their counterparts in classical cloud computing. Combined, this gives an overview of quantum cloud computing for the best user experience, paving the way towards user-centric quantum cloud computing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Alexander, T., et al.: Qiskit pulse: programming quantum computers through the cloud with pulses. Quantum Sci. Technol. 5(4), 044006 (020). https://doi.org/10.1088/2058-9565/aba404

  2. Alhambra: The quantum ecosystem that overcomes knowledge barriers (2021). https://www.alhambrait.com/en/products/qpath/

  3. Amazon: Amazon braket. https://aws.amazon.com/braket/

  4. Amazon Web Services: AWS HPC. https://aws.amazon.com/hpc/

  5. Apple Inc.: iCloud. https://icloud.com/

  6. Arrighi, P., Salvail, L.: Blind quantum computation. Int. J. Quantum Inf. 04(05), 883–898 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219749906002171

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Barz, S., Kashefi, E., Broadbent, A., Fitzsimons, J.F., Zeilinger, A., Walther, P.: Demonstration of blind quantum computing. Science 335(6066), 303–308 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1214707

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. van den Brink, R.F., Neumann, N.M.P., Phillipson, F.: Vision on next level quantum software tooling. In: 11th International Conference on Future Computational Technologies and Applications, pp. 16–23 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chellappa, R.: Intermediaries in cloud-computing: a new computing paradigm. In: INFORMS Annual Meeting, Dallas, pp. 26–29 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cicconetti, C., Conti, M., Passarella, A.: Resource allocation in quantum networks for distributed quantum computing. In: 2022 IEEE International Conference on Smart Computing (SMARTCOMP), pp. 124–132 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/SMARTCOMP55677.2022.00032

  11. Classiq: Designing and implementing quantum algorithms with functional level programming (2023). https://www.classiq.io/docs/functional-level-programming-basics

  12. Cojocaru, A., Colisson, L., Kashefi, E., Wallden, P.: On the possibility of classical client blind quantum computing. Cryptography 5(1), 3 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/cryptography5010003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Corcoles, A.D., et al.: Challenges and opportunities of near-term quantum computing systems. Proc. IEEE. 108(8), 1338–1352 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/jproc.2019.2954005

  14. Cross, A.W., Bishop, L.S., Sheldon, S., Nation, P.D., Gambetta, J.M.: Validating quantum computers using randomized model circuits. Phys. Rev. A 100, 032328 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.100.032328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. D-Wave Systems: Hybrid solver for discrete quadratic models (2020). https://www.dwavesys.com/media/ssidd1x3/14-1050a-a_hybrid_solver_for_discrete_quadratic_models.pdf

  16. D-Wave Systems: DWave-ocean-SDK (2021). https://github.com/dwavesystems/dwave-ocean-sdk

  17. van Deventer, O., et al.: Towards European standards for quantum technologies. EPJ Quantum Technol. 9(1), 33 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjqt/s40507-022-00150-1

  18. Dropbox: Dropbox. https://www.dropbox.com/

  19. Feld, S., et al.: A hybrid solution method for the capacitated vehicle routing problem using a quantum annealer. Front. ICT 6, 13 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Fingerhuth, M., Babej, T., Wittek, P.: Open source software in quantum computing. PLoS ONE 13(12), e0208561 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. IBM Quantum: IBM Quantum Experience (2021). https://quantum-computing.ibm.com/

  22. IDM: Types of cloud services. Medium (2018). https://medium.com/@IDMdatasecurity/types-of-cloud-services-b54e5b574f6

  23. Kadowaki, T., Nishimori, H.: Quantum annealing in the transverse Ising model. Phys. Rev. E 58, 5355–5363 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.58.5355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kaiiali, M., Sezer, S., Khalid, A.: Cloud computing in the quantum era. In: 2019 IEEE Conference on Communications and Network Security (CNS), pp. 1–4 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/CNS44998.2019.8952589

  25. Kavis, M.: The cloud’s lock-in vs. agility trade-off. https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/pages/consulting/articles/cloud-vendor-lock-in-deloitte-on-cloud-blog.html

  26. Khammassi, N., Guerreschi, G.G., Ashraf, I., Hogaboam, J.W., Almudever, C.G., Bertels, K.: cqasm v1.0: Towards a common quantum assembly language (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lanfear, T., Hitchcock, A.M., Berry, D.: Shared responsibility in the cloud - microsoft azure (2022). https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/security/fundamentals/shared-responsibility

  28. Lubinski, T., et al.: Application-oriented performance benchmarks for quantum computing (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Martiel, S., Ayral, T., Allouche, C.: Benchmarking quantum coprocessors in an application-centric, hardware-agnostic, and scalable way. IEEE Trans. Quantum Eng. 2, 1–11 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/tqe.2021.3090207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Mell, P., Grance, T.: The NIST definition of cloud computing (2011). https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.800-145

  31. Microsoft: Azure quantum. https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/services/quantum/

  32. Microsoft: Office Online. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/

  33. Möller, M., Schalkers, M.: Libket: A cross-platform programming framework for quantum-accelerated scientific computing. In: Krzhizhanovskaya, V.V., Závodszky, G., Lees, M.H., Dongarra, J.J., Sloot, P.M.A., Brissos, S., Teixeira, J. (eds.) Computational Science - ICCS 2020, pp. 451–464. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50433-5_35

  34. Neukart, F., Compostella, G., Seidel, C., Von Dollen, D., Yarkoni, S., Parney, B.: Traffic flow optimization using a quantum annealer. Front. ICT 4, 29 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Nielsen, M.A., Chuang, I.L.: Quantum Computation and Quantum Information: 10th Anniversary Edition. Cambridge University Press (2010). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511976667

  36. O’Brien, J.L.: Optical quantum computing. Science. 318(5856), 1567–1570 (2007). http://www.jstor.org/stable/20051746

  37. Owen, E.: Quantum cloud computing - Cambridge consultants on how to make it happen (2023). https://www.cambridgeconsultants.com/us/insights/opinion/quantum-cloud-computing

  38. PCMag: Cloud computing (2023). https://www.pcmag.com/encyclopedia/term/cloud-computing

  39. Phillipson, F., Neumann, N., Wezeman, R.: Classification of hybrid quantum-classical computing (2022). https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2210.15314

  40. QuTech: Quantum inspire home. https://www.quantum-inspire.com/ (2018)

  41. Saleem, Z.H., Tomesh, T., Perlin, M.A., Gokhale, P., Suchara, M.: Divide and conquer for combinatorial optimization and distributed quantum computation (2021). https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2107.07532

  42. Salm, M., Barzen, J., Breitenbücher, U., Leymann, F., Weder, B., Wild, K.: The NISQ analyzer: Automating the selection of quantum computers for quantum algorithms. In: Service-Oriented Computing, pp. 66–85. Springer International Publishing (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64846-6_5

  43. van der Schoot, W.E., Wezeman, R.S., Eendebak, P.T., Neumann, N.M.P., Phillipson, F.: Evaluating three levels of quantum metrics on quantum-inspire hardware. (unpublished)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Shor, P.: Algorithms for quantum computation: Discrete logarithms and factoring. In: Proceedings 35th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (1994). https://doi.org/10.1109/sfcs.1994.365700

  45. Singh, H., Sachdev, A.: The quantum way of cloud computing. In: 2014 International Conference on Reliability Optimization and Information Technology (ICROIT), pp. 397–400 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICROIT.2014.6798362

  46. Smith, R.S., Curtis, M.J., Zeng, W.J.: A practical quantum instruction set architecture (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Treinish, M., et al.: Qiskit/qiskit: Qiskit 0.42.1 (2023). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7757946

  48. Vasudevan, T.: Bluebleed leak proves again, not all cloud service providers are secure, https://www.skyhighsecurity.com/en-us/about/newsroom/blogs/industry-perspectives/bluebleed-leak-proves-it-again-you-cannot-assume-cloud-service-providers-are-secure.html

  49. White, J.E.: Network Specifications for Remote Job Entry and Remote Job Output Retrieval at UCSB. RFC 105 (1971). https://doi.org/10.17487/RFC0105

  50. Wray, J.: Where’s the rub: Cloud computing’s hidden costs (2014). https://www.forbes.com/sites/centurylink/2014/02/27/wheres-the-rub-cloud-computings-hidden-costs/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Niels M. P Neumann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Neumann, N.M.P., van der Schoot, W., Sijpesteijn, T. (2023). Quantum Cloud Computing from a User Perspective. In: Krieger, U.R., Eichler, G., Erfurth, C., Fahrnberger, G. (eds) Innovations for Community Services. I4CS 2023. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1876. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40852-6_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40852-6_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-40851-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-40852-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics