Abstract
Robotic Process Automation (RPA) is a popular software used for process automation in order to automate administrative tasks, traditionally performed by knowledge workers. The existing research on RPA is lacking in terms of what is known about how this type of technology affects the work situations of employees and their experiences with it. In this study, we seek to contribute to this knowledge gap by conducting an inductive analysis of employee experiences in three Swedish municipalities to explore the effects of RPA on their work situation. We find that RPA creates different effects during implementation compared to post-implementation, and that these effects can be positive or negative in both cases. Furthermore, we show that RPA may alleviate stress in one area of the organization, but that new stress emerges in another. We also conclude that the experiences on the individual level are interconnected with the organizational and managerial aspects of RPA, showing the need to further interconnect knowledge in these areas. Finally, we present some recommendations for future research, with an emphasis on studying employees’ work situations from a work environment perspective.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Kregel, I., Koch, J., Plattfaut, R.: Beyond the hype: robotic process automation’s public perception over time. J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commer. 31(2), 130–150 (2021)
Juell-Skielse, G., Güner, E.O., Han, S.: Adoption of robotic process automation in the public sector: a survey study in Sweden. In: Janssen, M., et al. (eds.) EGOV 2022. LNCS, vol. 13391, pp. 336–352. Springer, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15086-9_22
SALAR: Automatisering Av Arbete. SALAR, Stockholm (2018)
Svensson, L.: Tekniken är den enkla biten. Om att implementera digital automatisering i handläggningen av försörjningsstöd, Lund (2019)
Hindel, J., Cabrera, L.M., Stierle, M.: Robotic process automation: hype or hope? In: Wirtschaftsinformatik (Zentrale Tracks), pp. 1750–1762, March 2020
SAWEE (Swedish Agency for Work Environment Expertise): Artificiell intelligens, robotisering och arbetsmiljö (2022)
SAWEE (Swedish Agency for Work Environment Expertise): Identifierade Kunskapsluckor 2022 – Myndigheten För Arbetsmiljökunskap (2022). https://mynak.se/identifierade-kunskapsluckor-2022/. Accessed 26 Mar 2023
Germundsson, N.: Promoting the digital future: the construction of digital automation in Swedish policy discourse on social assistance. Crit. Policy Stud. 16(4), 478–496 (2022)
Veale, M., Brass, I.: Administration by Algorithm? Public Management meets Public Sector Machine Learning. Oxford University Press (2019)
Wihlborg, E., Larsson, H., Hedström, K.: The computer says no!”–a case study on automated decision-making in public authorities. In: 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), pp. 2903–2912. IEEE, 2016 January
Staaby, A., Hansen, K.S., Grønli, T.M.: Automation of routine work: a case study of employees’ experiences of work meaningfulness. In: 54th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, HICSS 2021, pp. 156–165. Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) (2021)
Waizenegger, L., Techatassanasoontorn, A.A.: When robots join our team: a configuration theory of employees’ perceptions of and reactions to robotic process automation. Australas. J. Inf. Syst. 26 (2022)
Eikebrokk, T.R., Olsen, D.H.: Robotic process automation for knowledge workers – will it lead to empowerment or lay-offs? Bibsys Open Journal Syst. 27(1) (2019). ISSN 1894-7719. Paper Presented at NOKOBIT 2019, Narvik, 25–26 November 2019
Lamberton, C., Brigo, D., Hoy, D.: Impact of robotics, RPA and AI on the insurance industry: challenges and opportunities. J. Financ. Perspect. 4(1) (2017)
Pramod, D.: Robotic process automation for industry: adoption status, benefits, challenges and research agenda. Benchmarking: Int. J. 29(5), 1562–1586 (2021)
Denagama Vitharanage, I.M., Bandara, W., Syed, R., Toman, D.: An empirically supported conceptualisation of robotic process automation (RPA) benefits. In: Proceedings of the 28th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2020). Association for Information Systems, June 2020
Kaniadakis, A., Linturn, L.: Organisational adoption of a hyped technology: the case of robotic process automation. In: ECIS 2021 Research Papers, p. 46 (2021)
Osman, C.C.: Robotic process automation: lessons learned from case studies. Informatica Economica 23(4) (2019)
Penttinen, E., Kasslin, H., Asatiani, A.: How to choose between robotic process automation and back-end system automation? In: European Conference on Information Systems 2018, June 2018
Plattfaut, R., Borghoff, V., Godefroid, M., Koch, J., Trampler, M., Coners, A.: The critical success factors for robotic process automation. Comput. Ind. 138, 103646 (2022)
Stamoulis, D.: Management considerations for robotic process automation implementations in digital industries. J. Inf. Syst. Technol. Manag. 7(25), 35–53 (2022)
Lacity, M., Willcocks, L.: What knowledge workers stand to gain from automation. Harv. Bus. Rev. 19(6) (2015)
Syed, R., Wynn, M.T.: How to trust a bot: an RPA user perspective. In: Asatiani, A., et al. (eds.) BPM 2020. LNBIP, vol. 393, pp. 147–160. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58779-6_10
Dias, M., Pan, S., Tim, Y.: Knowledge embodiment of human and machine interactions: robotic-process-automation at the Finland government. In: Proceedings of the 27th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Uppsala, Sweden (2019)
Lindgren, I.: Exploring the use of robotic process automation in local government. In: EGOV-CeDEM-ePart 2020, p. 249 (2020)
Van de Ven, A.H.: Engaged Scholarship: A Guide for Organizational and Social Research. Oxford University Press (2007). on Demand
Myers, M.D.: Qualitative research in information systems. MIS Q. 21(2), 241–242 (1997). https://doi.org/10.2307/249422
Walsham, G.: Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 4(2), 74–81 (1995)
Patton, M.Q.: Qualitative Evaluation Methods. Sage, Beverly Hills (1980)
Vetenskapsrådet: Forskningsetiska principer inom humanistisk-samhällsvetenskaplig forskning. Vetenskapsrådet, Stockholm (2002)
Vetenskapsrådet: God forskningssed. Vetenskapsrådet, Stockholm (2017)
All European Academies: The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity (2017). https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/. Accessed 10 June 2023
Toll, D., Lindgren, I., Melin, U.: Stakeholder views of process automation as an enabler of prioritized value ideals in a Swedish municipality. JeDEM-eJ. eDemocr. Open Gov. 14(2), 32–56 (2022)
Corbin, J.M., Strauss, A.: Grounded theory research: procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qual. Sociol. 13(1), 3–21 (1990)
Glaser, B.G., Strauss, A.L.: Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Routledge (2017)
Acknowledgements
This work is supported by AFA Försäkring, as part of the research project “From Form to Robot?” (190200).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Toll, D., Booth, M., Lindgren, I. (2023). Robot Colleagues in Swedish Municipalities: How RPA Affects the Work Situation of Employees. In: Lindgren, I., et al. Electronic Government. EGOV 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14130. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41138-0_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41138-0_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-41137-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-41138-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)