Skip to main content

Robot Colleagues in Swedish Municipalities: How RPA Affects the Work Situation of Employees

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Electronic Government (EGOV 2023)

Abstract

Robotic Process Automation (RPA) is a popular software used for process automation in order to automate administrative tasks, traditionally performed by knowledge workers. The existing research on RPA is lacking in terms of what is known about how this type of technology affects the work situations of employees and their experiences with it. In this study, we seek to contribute to this knowledge gap by conducting an inductive analysis of employee experiences in three Swedish municipalities to explore the effects of RPA on their work situation. We find that RPA creates different effects during implementation compared to post-implementation, and that these effects can be positive or negative in both cases. Furthermore, we show that RPA may alleviate stress in one area of the organization, but that new stress emerges in another. We also conclude that the experiences on the individual level are interconnected with the organizational and managerial aspects of RPA, showing the need to further interconnect knowledge in these areas. Finally, we present some recommendations for future research, with an emphasis on studying employees’ work situations from a work environment perspective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kregel, I., Koch, J., Plattfaut, R.: Beyond the hype: robotic process automation’s public perception over time. J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commer. 31(2), 130–150 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Juell-Skielse, G., Güner, E.O., Han, S.: Adoption of robotic process automation in the public sector: a survey study in Sweden. In: Janssen, M., et al. (eds.) EGOV 2022. LNCS, vol. 13391, pp. 336–352. Springer, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15086-9_22

  3. SALAR: Automatisering Av Arbete. SALAR, Stockholm (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Svensson, L.: Tekniken är den enkla biten. Om att implementera digital automatisering i handläggningen av försörjningsstöd, Lund (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hindel, J., Cabrera, L.M., Stierle, M.: Robotic process automation: hype or hope? In: Wirtschaftsinformatik (Zentrale Tracks), pp. 1750–1762, March 2020

    Google Scholar 

  6. SAWEE (Swedish Agency for Work Environment Expertise): Artificiell intelligens, robotisering och arbetsmiljö (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  7. SAWEE (Swedish Agency for Work Environment Expertise): Identifierade Kunskapsluckor 2022 – Myndigheten För Arbetsmiljökunskap (2022). https://mynak.se/identifierade-kunskapsluckor-2022/. Accessed 26 Mar 2023

  8. Germundsson, N.: Promoting the digital future: the construction of digital automation in Swedish policy discourse on social assistance. Crit. Policy Stud. 16(4), 478–496 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Veale, M., Brass, I.: Administration by Algorithm? Public Management meets Public Sector Machine Learning. Oxford University Press (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wihlborg, E., Larsson, H., Hedström, K.: The computer says no!”–a case study on automated decision-making in public authorities. In: 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), pp. 2903–2912. IEEE, 2016 January

    Google Scholar 

  11. Staaby, A., Hansen, K.S., Grønli, T.M.: Automation of routine work: a case study of employees’ experiences of work meaningfulness. In: 54th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, HICSS 2021, pp. 156–165. Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Waizenegger, L., Techatassanasoontorn, A.A.: When robots join our team: a configuration theory of employees’ perceptions of and reactions to robotic process automation. Australas. J. Inf. Syst. 26 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Eikebrokk, T.R., Olsen, D.H.: Robotic process automation for knowledge workers – will it lead to empowerment or lay-offs? Bibsys Open Journal Syst. 27(1) (2019). ISSN 1894-7719. Paper Presented at NOKOBIT 2019, Narvik, 25–26 November 2019

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lamberton, C., Brigo, D., Hoy, D.: Impact of robotics, RPA and AI on the insurance industry: challenges and opportunities. J. Financ. Perspect. 4(1) (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pramod, D.: Robotic process automation for industry: adoption status, benefits, challenges and research agenda. Benchmarking: Int. J. 29(5), 1562–1586 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Denagama Vitharanage, I.M., Bandara, W., Syed, R., Toman, D.: An empirically supported conceptualisation of robotic process automation (RPA) benefits. In: Proceedings of the 28th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2020). Association for Information Systems, June 2020

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kaniadakis, A., Linturn, L.: Organisational adoption of a hyped technology: the case of robotic process automation. In: ECIS 2021 Research Papers, p. 46 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Osman, C.C.: Robotic process automation: lessons learned from case studies. Informatica Economica 23(4) (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Penttinen, E., Kasslin, H., Asatiani, A.: How to choose between robotic process automation and back-end system automation? In: European Conference on Information Systems 2018, June 2018

    Google Scholar 

  20. Plattfaut, R., Borghoff, V., Godefroid, M., Koch, J., Trampler, M., Coners, A.: The critical success factors for robotic process automation. Comput. Ind. 138, 103646 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Stamoulis, D.: Management considerations for robotic process automation implementations in digital industries. J. Inf. Syst. Technol. Manag. 7(25), 35–53 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lacity, M., Willcocks, L.: What knowledge workers stand to gain from automation. Harv. Bus. Rev. 19(6) (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Syed, R., Wynn, M.T.: How to trust a bot: an RPA user perspective. In: Asatiani, A., et al. (eds.) BPM 2020. LNBIP, vol. 393, pp. 147–160. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58779-6_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Dias, M., Pan, S., Tim, Y.: Knowledge embodiment of human and machine interactions: robotic-process-automation at the Finland government. In: Proceedings of the 27th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Uppsala, Sweden (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lindgren, I.: Exploring the use of robotic process automation in local government. In: EGOV-CeDEM-ePart 2020, p. 249 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Van de Ven, A.H.: Engaged Scholarship: A Guide for Organizational and Social Research. Oxford University Press (2007). on Demand

    Google Scholar 

  27. Myers, M.D.: Qualitative research in information systems. MIS Q. 21(2), 241–242 (1997). https://doi.org/10.2307/249422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Walsham, G.: Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 4(2), 74–81 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Patton, M.Q.: Qualitative Evaluation Methods. Sage, Beverly Hills (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Vetenskapsrådet: Forskningsetiska principer inom humanistisk-samhällsvetenskaplig forskning. Vetenskapsrådet, Stockholm (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Vetenskapsrådet: God forskningssed. Vetenskapsrådet, Stockholm (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  32. All European Academies: The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity (2017). https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/. Accessed 10 June 2023

  33. Toll, D., Lindgren, I., Melin, U.: Stakeholder views of process automation as an enabler of prioritized value ideals in a Swedish municipality. JeDEM-eJ. eDemocr. Open Gov. 14(2), 32–56 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Corbin, J.M., Strauss, A.: Grounded theory research: procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qual. Sociol. 13(1), 3–21 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Glaser, B.G., Strauss, A.L.: Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Routledge (2017)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by AFA Försäkring, as part of the research project “From Form to Robot?” (190200).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Toll .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Toll, D., Booth, M., Lindgren, I. (2023). Robot Colleagues in Swedish Municipalities: How RPA Affects the Work Situation of Employees. In: Lindgren, I., et al. Electronic Government. EGOV 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14130. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41138-0_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41138-0_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-41137-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-41138-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics