Abstract
The standardization of procurement procedures is a complex process requiring multiple layers of interoperability along the European Interoperability Framework (EIF) to be ensured. The high number of distinct actors and different legal frameworks involved hampers efficiency and interoperability of procedures. This problem situation is even more critical during the pre-award phase of procurement, which has so far received less attention from researchers and solution providers alike. While many individual solution components are available for the pre-award phase, these are not orchestrated towards a holistic procedure model. This paper aims to close this gap by A) elaborating a theoretical overview and mapping between issues and proposed solutions, and B) deriving a holistic model for the harmonization of the pre-award phase centered on the orchestration of all identified solution components. Based on the maturity level of the solution components, specific recommendations for action regarding the implementation of the harmonization model are formulated. Methodically, A) is elaborated by iterating three literature review cycles to i) establish relevant concepts in the research field of eProcurement, ii) identify common key issue areas during the pre-award phase and iii) identify solutions for these issues. B) is derived using Design Science Research (DSR).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
https://peppol.org/, last accessed on 26.03.23.
- 2.
https://docs.peppol.eu/pracc/, last accessed on 26.03.23.
- 3.
https://docs.peppol.eu/poacc/upgrade-3/, last accessed on 26.03.23.
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
https://docs.peppol.eu/pracc/catalogue/1.0/bis/, last accessed 26.03.2023.
- 9.
HYPERLINK "sps:urlprefix::https" https://www.schematron.com/home/overview.html, last accessed 31.03.2023.
References
Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC Text with EEA relevance (2014)
Directive 2014/25/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on procurement by entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors and repealing Directive 2004/17/EC Text with EEA relevance (2014)
Digital procurement. https://single-market-economy.ec.europa.eu/single-market/public-procurement/digital-procurement_en
Kierkegaard, S.: Going, going, gone! e-procurement in the EU (2008)
European Commission: New European interoperability framework: promoting seamless services and data flows for European public administrations. DG Informatics, LU (2017)
Mondorf, A., Schmidt, D., Wimmer, M.: Ensuring sustainable operation in complex environment: the PEPPOL project and its VCD system. In: MCIS 2010 Proceedings (2010)
Mueller-Bloch, C., Kranz, J.: A framework for rigorously identifying research gaps in qualitative literature reviews. Presented at the December 13 (2015)
Webster, J., Watson, R.T.: Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: writing a literature review. MIS Q. 26, xiii–xxiii (2002)
Panayiotou, N.A., Stavrou, V.P.: Government to business e-services – a systematic literature review. Gov. Inf. Q. 38, 101576 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101576
Mohungoo, I., Brown, I., Kabanda, S.: A systematic review of implementation challenges in public E-Procurement. In: Hattingh, M., Matthee, M., Smuts, H., Pappas, I., Dwivedi, Y.K., Mäntymäki, M. (eds.) I3E 2020. LNCS, vol. 12067, pp. 46–58. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45002-1_5
Mavidis, A., Folinas, D.: From public E-Procurement 3.0 to E-Procurement 4.0; a critical literature review. Sustainability 14, 11252 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811252
Shirzad, S.R., Bell, D.: A systematic literature review of flexible E-procurement marketplace. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 8, 49–70 (2013). https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-18762013000200005
Kouroubali, A., Katehakis, D.G.: The new European interoperability framework as a facilitator of digital transformation for citizen empowerment. J. Biomed. Inform. 94, 103166 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103166
Brocke, J.V., Simons, A., Niehaves, B., Riemer, K., Plattfaut, R., Cleven, A.: Reconstructing the giant: on the importance of rigour in documenting the literature search process. Presented at the http://www.alexandria.unisg.ch/Publikationen/67910 June 10 (2009)
European Commission: ANNEX 2 to the communication from the commission to the European parliament, the council, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions. DG Informatics, LU (2017)
Gottschalk, P.: Maturity levels for interoperability in digital government. Gov. Inf. Q. 26, 75–81 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2008.03.003
Hardy, C.A., Williams, S.P.: E-government policy and practice: a theoretical and empirical exploration of public e-procurement. Gov. Inf. Q. 25, 155–180 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2007.02.003
Henning, F.: A theoretical framework on the determinants of organisational adoption of interoperability standards in Government information networks. Gov. Inf. Q. 35, S61–S67 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.11.008
Margariti, V., Stamati, T., Anagnostopoulos, D., Nikolaidou, M., Papastilianou, A.: A holistic model for assessing organizational interoperability in public administration. Gov. Inf. Q. 39, 101712 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101712
Riihimäki, E., Pekkola, S.: Public buyer’s concerns influencing the early phases of information system acquisition. Gov. Inf. Q. 38, 101595 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101595
Akenroye, T.O., Owens, J.D., Elbaz, J., Durowoju, O.A.: Dynamic capabilities for SME participation in public procurement. Bus. Process. Manag. J. 26, 857–888 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-10-2019-0447
Loader, K.: Small- and medium-sized enterprises and public procurement: a review of the UK coalition government’s policies and their impact. Environ. Plan. C: Polit. Space 36, 47–66 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1177/2399654417692987
Gorgun, M.K., Kutlu, M., Tas, B.K.O.: Information is essential for competitive and cost-effective public procurement. J. Inf. Sci. 01655515221141042 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1177/01655515221141042
Concha, G., Astudillo, H., Porrúa, M., Pimenta, C.: E-Government procurement observatory, maturity model and early measurements. Gov. Inf. Q. 29, S43–S50 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2011.08.005
Hellberg, A.-S., Grönlund, Å.: Conflicts in implementing interoperability: re-operationalizing basic values. Gov. Inf. Q. 30, 154–162 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.10.006
Kalogirou, V., Stasis, A., Charalabidis, Y.: Assessing and improving the National Interoperability Frameworks of European Union Member States: the case of Greece. Gov. Inf. Q. 39, 101716 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101716
Klabi, H., Mellouli, S., Rekik, M.: A reputation based electronic government procurement model. Gov. Inf. Q. 35, S43–S53 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.01.001
Qiao, Y., Cummings, G.: The use of qualifications-based selection in public procurement: a survey research. J. Public Procurement 3, 215–249 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-03-02-2003-B004
Glas, A.H., Eßig, M.: Factors that influence the success of small and medium-sized suppliers in public procurement: evidence from a centralized agency in Germany. Supply Chain Manag. Int. J. 23, 65–78 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-09-2016-0334
Di Mauro, C., Ancarani, A., Hartley, T.: Unravelling SMEs’ participation and success in public procurement. J. Public Procurement 20, 377–401 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-03-2018-0013
Tammi, T., Saastamoinen, J., Reijonen, H.: Market orientation and SMEsʼ activity in public sector procurement participation. J. Public Procurement 14, 304–327 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-14-03-2014-B001
Sönnichsen, S.D., Clement, J.: Review of green and sustainable public procurement: towards circular public procurement. J. Clean. Prod. 245, 118901 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118901
Sciore, E., Siegel, M., Rosenthal, A.: Using semantic values to facilitate interoperability among heterogeneous information systems. ACM Trans. Database Syst. 19, 254–290 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1145/176567.176570
Khatri, V., Brown, C.V.: Designing data governance. Commun. ACM. 53, 148–152 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1145/1629175.1629210
European Commission: SME needs analysis in public procurement: final report. Directorate General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs, LU (2021)
Flynn, A.: Investigating the implementation of SME-friendly policy in public procurement. Policy Stud. 39, 422–443 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2018.1478406
Harland, C.M., Caldwell, N.D., Powell, P., Zheng, J.: Barriers to supply chain information integration: SMEs adrift of eLands. J. Oper. Manag. 25, 1234–1254 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2007.01.004
Soylu, A., et al.: Data quality barriers for transparency in public procurement. Information 13, 99 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/info13020099
Paľová, D., Vejačka, M.: Identifying the challenges in e-procurement standardization. IDIMT-2022 (2022)
Woldesenbet, K., Worthington, I.: Public procurement and small businesses: estranged or engaged? J. Small Bus. Manage. 57, 1661–1675 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12442
Namli, T., Dogac, A.: Testing conformance and interoperability of eHealth applications. Methods Inf. Med. 49, 281–289 (2010). https://doi.org/10.3414/ME09-02-0022
Sonntagbauer, P.: The PEPPOL project – cross border E- Procurement Int public administrations. In: 3rd International Public Procurement Conference Proceedings (2008)
Martins, J., Barroso, J., Gonçalves, R., Sousa, A., Bacelar, M., Paredes, H.: Transforming e-Procurement Platforms for PEPPOL and WCAG 2.0 compliance. In: Kim, K.J. (ed.) Information Science and Applications. LNEE, vol. 339, pp. 973–980. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46578-3_116
Schmitz, A., Mondorf, A., Wimmer, M.A.: Framework for designing interoperable public service architectures with exemplification along small-scale procurement and PEPPOL. In: DG.O 2022: The 23rd Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, pp. 22–34. ACM, Virtual Event Republic of Korea (2022)
Sonntagbauer, P.: E-Business, emerging trends in the European Union. In: Gusev, M., Mitrevski, P. (eds.) ICT Innovations 2010. CCIS, vol. 83, pp. 40–50. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19325-5_5
OASIS ebXML RegRep Version 4.0, Part 0: Overview Document. 18 (2012)
Works, S.: Pre-award specifications and guidelines. https://peppol.eu/downloads/pre-award/
The TOGAF® Standard, Version 9.2. https://pubs.opengroup.org/architecture/togaf9-doc/arch/
Guijarro, L.: Interoperability frameworks and enterprise architectures in e-government initiatives in Europe and the United States. Gov. Inf. Q. 24, 89–101 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2006.05.003
Mondorf, A., Wimmer, M.: Contextual components of an enterprise architecture framework for pan-European eGovernment services. Presented at the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2017)
Ajer, A.K., Olsen, D.: Enterprise architecture challenges: a case study of three Norwegian public sectors. Presented at the Twenty-Sixth European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS2018), June 25, Portsmouth, UK (2018)
Siapera, M., Schmitz, A., Wimmer, M.A., Prentza, A.: AgInTeF: Agile interoperability testing framework for orchestrating overarching procedures in verifying digital public services. In: 24th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research - Together in the unstable world: Digital government and solidarity (DGO 2023). Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2023)
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/ 7 - of 5 January 2016 - establishing the standard form for the European Single Procurement Document
Hudrasyah, H., Nugraha, M.Y.C., Fatima, I., Rahadi, R.A.: E-Catalogue attractiveness study to increase suppliers participation
European Commission: Dynamic purchasing systems: use guidelines. DG Internal Market, LU (2021)
Eyo, A.: Evidence on use of dynamic purchasing systems in the United Kingdom (UK). Public Procurement Law Rev. 6, 237–248 (2017)
Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 2014 on electronic identification and trust services for electronic transactions in the internal market and repealing Directive 1999/93/EC. (2014)
Lips, S., Vinogradova, N., Krimmer, R., Draheim, D.: Re-Shaping the EU digital identity framework. In: DG.O 2022: The 23rd Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, pp. 13–21. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2022)
A trusted and secure European e-ID - Evaluation of the Regulation | Shaping Europe’s digital future. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/trusted-and-secure-european-e-id-evaluation-regulation
Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the COUNCIL AMENDING REGULATION (EU) No 910/2014 as regards establishing a framework for a European Digital Identity (2021)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Schmitz, A., Siapera, M., Prentza, A., Wimmer, M.A. (2023). Harmonization in eProcurement: Design of a Holistic Solution Model for Pre-award Procedures. In: Lindgren, I., et al. Electronic Government. EGOV 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14130. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41138-0_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41138-0_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-41137-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-41138-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)