Skip to main content

Harmonization in eProcurement: Design of a Holistic Solution Model for Pre-award Procedures

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Electronic Government (EGOV 2023)

Abstract

The standardization of procurement procedures is a complex process requiring multiple layers of interoperability along the European Interoperability Framework (EIF) to be ensured. The high number of distinct actors and different legal frameworks involved hampers efficiency and interoperability of procedures. This problem situation is even more critical during the pre-award phase of procurement, which has so far received less attention from researchers and solution providers alike. While many individual solution components are available for the pre-award phase, these are not orchestrated towards a holistic procedure model. This paper aims to close this gap by A) elaborating a theoretical overview and mapping between issues and proposed solutions, and B) deriving a holistic model for the harmonization of the pre-award phase centered on the orchestration of all identified solution components. Based on the maturity level of the solution components, specific recommendations for action regarding the implementation of the harmonization model are formulated. Methodically, A) is elaborated by iterating three literature review cycles to i) establish relevant concepts in the research field of eProcurement, ii) identify common key issue areas during the pre-award phase and iii) identify solutions for these issues. B) is derived using Design Science Research (DSR).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://peppol.org/, last accessed on 26.03.23.

  2. 2.

    https://docs.peppol.eu/pracc/, last accessed on 26.03.23.

  3. 3.

    https://docs.peppol.eu/poacc/upgrade-3/, last accessed on 26.03.23.

  4. 4.

    https://peppol.eu/what-is-peppol/.

  5. 5.

    https://peppol.eu/what-is-peppol/peppol-profiles-specifications/.

  6. 6.

    https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=ubl#overview.

  7. 7.

    https://ec.europa.eu/tools/ecertis/#/about.

  8. 8.

    https://docs.peppol.eu/pracc/catalogue/1.0/bis/, last accessed 26.03.2023.

  9. 9.

    HYPERLINK "sps:urlprefix::https" https://www.schematron.com/home/overview.html, last accessed 31.03.2023.

References

  1. Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC Text with EEA relevance (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Directive 2014/25/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on procurement by entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors and repealing Directive 2004/17/EC Text with EEA relevance (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Digital procurement. https://single-market-economy.ec.europa.eu/single-market/public-procurement/digital-procurement_en

  4. Kierkegaard, S.: Going, going, gone! e-procurement in the EU (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  5. European Commission: New European interoperability framework: promoting seamless services and data flows for European public administrations. DG Informatics, LU (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mondorf, A., Schmidt, D., Wimmer, M.: Ensuring sustainable operation in complex environment: the PEPPOL project and its VCD system. In: MCIS 2010 Proceedings (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mueller-Bloch, C., Kranz, J.: A framework for rigorously identifying research gaps in qualitative literature reviews. Presented at the December 13 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Webster, J., Watson, R.T.: Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: writing a literature review. MIS Q. 26, xiii–xxiii (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Panayiotou, N.A., Stavrou, V.P.: Government to business e-services – a systematic literature review. Gov. Inf. Q. 38, 101576 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mohungoo, I., Brown, I., Kabanda, S.: A systematic review of implementation challenges in public E-Procurement. In: Hattingh, M., Matthee, M., Smuts, H., Pappas, I., Dwivedi, Y.K., Mäntymäki, M. (eds.) I3E 2020. LNCS, vol. 12067, pp. 46–58. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45002-1_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Mavidis, A., Folinas, D.: From public E-Procurement 3.0 to E-Procurement 4.0; a critical literature review. Sustainability 14, 11252 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811252

  12. Shirzad, S.R., Bell, D.: A systematic literature review of flexible E-procurement marketplace. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 8, 49–70 (2013). https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-18762013000200005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kouroubali, A., Katehakis, D.G.: The new European interoperability framework as a facilitator of digital transformation for citizen empowerment. J. Biomed. Inform. 94, 103166 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Brocke, J.V., Simons, A., Niehaves, B., Riemer, K., Plattfaut, R., Cleven, A.: Reconstructing the giant: on the importance of rigour in documenting the literature search process. Presented at the http://www.alexandria.unisg.ch/Publikationen/67910 June 10 (2009)

  15. European Commission: ANNEX 2 to the communication from the commission to the European parliament, the council, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions. DG Informatics, LU (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gottschalk, P.: Maturity levels for interoperability in digital government. Gov. Inf. Q. 26, 75–81 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2008.03.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hardy, C.A., Williams, S.P.: E-government policy and practice: a theoretical and empirical exploration of public e-procurement. Gov. Inf. Q. 25, 155–180 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2007.02.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Henning, F.: A theoretical framework on the determinants of organisational adoption of interoperability standards in Government information networks. Gov. Inf. Q. 35, S61–S67 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.11.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Margariti, V., Stamati, T., Anagnostopoulos, D., Nikolaidou, M., Papastilianou, A.: A holistic model for assessing organizational interoperability in public administration. Gov. Inf. Q. 39, 101712 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Riihimäki, E., Pekkola, S.: Public buyer’s concerns influencing the early phases of information system acquisition. Gov. Inf. Q. 38, 101595 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Akenroye, T.O., Owens, J.D., Elbaz, J., Durowoju, O.A.: Dynamic capabilities for SME participation in public procurement. Bus. Process. Manag. J. 26, 857–888 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-10-2019-0447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Loader, K.: Small- and medium-sized enterprises and public procurement: a review of the UK coalition government’s policies and their impact. Environ. Plan. C: Polit. Space 36, 47–66 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1177/2399654417692987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gorgun, M.K., Kutlu, M., Tas, B.K.O.: Information is essential for competitive and cost-effective public procurement. J. Inf. Sci. 01655515221141042 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1177/01655515221141042

  24. Concha, G., Astudillo, H., Porrúa, M., Pimenta, C.: E-Government procurement observatory, maturity model and early measurements. Gov. Inf. Q. 29, S43–S50 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2011.08.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hellberg, A.-S., Grönlund, Å.: Conflicts in implementing interoperability: re-operationalizing basic values. Gov. Inf. Q. 30, 154–162 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.10.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kalogirou, V., Stasis, A., Charalabidis, Y.: Assessing and improving the National Interoperability Frameworks of European Union Member States: the case of Greece. Gov. Inf. Q. 39, 101716 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Klabi, H., Mellouli, S., Rekik, M.: A reputation based electronic government procurement model. Gov. Inf. Q. 35, S43–S53 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.01.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Qiao, Y., Cummings, G.: The use of qualifications-based selection in public procurement: a survey research. J. Public Procurement 3, 215–249 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-03-02-2003-B004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Glas, A.H., Eßig, M.: Factors that influence the success of small and medium-sized suppliers in public procurement: evidence from a centralized agency in Germany. Supply Chain Manag. Int. J. 23, 65–78 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-09-2016-0334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Di Mauro, C., Ancarani, A., Hartley, T.: Unravelling SMEs’ participation and success in public procurement. J. Public Procurement 20, 377–401 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-03-2018-0013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Tammi, T., Saastamoinen, J., Reijonen, H.: Market orientation and SMEsʼ activity in public sector procurement participation. J. Public Procurement 14, 304–327 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-14-03-2014-B001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Sönnichsen, S.D., Clement, J.: Review of green and sustainable public procurement: towards circular public procurement. J. Clean. Prod. 245, 118901 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sciore, E., Siegel, M., Rosenthal, A.: Using semantic values to facilitate interoperability among heterogeneous information systems. ACM Trans. Database Syst. 19, 254–290 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1145/176567.176570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Khatri, V., Brown, C.V.: Designing data governance. Commun. ACM. 53, 148–152 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1145/1629175.1629210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. European Commission: SME needs analysis in public procurement: final report. Directorate General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs, LU (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Flynn, A.: Investigating the implementation of SME-friendly policy in public procurement. Policy Stud. 39, 422–443 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2018.1478406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Harland, C.M., Caldwell, N.D., Powell, P., Zheng, J.: Barriers to supply chain information integration: SMEs adrift of eLands. J. Oper. Manag. 25, 1234–1254 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2007.01.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Soylu, A., et al.: Data quality barriers for transparency in public procurement. Information 13, 99 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/info13020099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Paľová, D., Vejačka, M.: Identifying the challenges in e-procurement standardization. IDIMT-2022 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Woldesenbet, K., Worthington, I.: Public procurement and small businesses: estranged or engaged? J. Small Bus. Manage. 57, 1661–1675 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Namli, T., Dogac, A.: Testing conformance and interoperability of eHealth applications. Methods Inf. Med. 49, 281–289 (2010). https://doi.org/10.3414/ME09-02-0022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Sonntagbauer, P.: The PEPPOL project – cross border E- Procurement Int public administrations. In: 3rd International Public Procurement Conference Proceedings (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Martins, J., Barroso, J., Gonçalves, R., Sousa, A., Bacelar, M., Paredes, H.: Transforming e-Procurement Platforms for PEPPOL and WCAG 2.0 compliance. In: Kim, K.J. (ed.) Information Science and Applications. LNEE, vol. 339, pp. 973–980. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46578-3_116

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  44. Schmitz, A., Mondorf, A., Wimmer, M.A.: Framework for designing interoperable public service architectures with exemplification along small-scale procurement and PEPPOL. In: DG.O 2022: The 23rd Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, pp. 22–34. ACM, Virtual Event Republic of Korea (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Sonntagbauer, P.: E-Business, emerging trends in the European Union. In: Gusev, M., Mitrevski, P. (eds.) ICT Innovations 2010. CCIS, vol. 83, pp. 40–50. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19325-5_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  46. OASIS ebXML RegRep Version 4.0, Part 0: Overview Document. 18 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Works, S.: Pre-award specifications and guidelines. https://peppol.eu/downloads/pre-award/

  48. The TOGAF® Standard, Version 9.2. https://pubs.opengroup.org/architecture/togaf9-doc/arch/

  49. Guijarro, L.: Interoperability frameworks and enterprise architectures in e-government initiatives in Europe and the United States. Gov. Inf. Q. 24, 89–101 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2006.05.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Mondorf, A., Wimmer, M.: Contextual components of an enterprise architecture framework for pan-European eGovernment services. Presented at the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Ajer, A.K., Olsen, D.: Enterprise architecture challenges: a case study of three Norwegian public sectors. Presented at the Twenty-Sixth European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS2018), June 25, Portsmouth, UK (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Siapera, M., Schmitz, A., Wimmer, M.A., Prentza, A.: AgInTeF: Agile interoperability testing framework for orchestrating overarching procedures in verifying digital public services. In: 24th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research - Together in the unstable world: Digital government and solidarity (DGO 2023). Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/ 7 - of 5 January 2016 - establishing the standard form for the European Single Procurement Document

    Google Scholar 

  54. Hudrasyah, H., Nugraha, M.Y.C., Fatima, I., Rahadi, R.A.: E-Catalogue attractiveness study to increase suppliers participation

    Google Scholar 

  55. European Commission: Dynamic purchasing systems: use guidelines. DG Internal Market, LU (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  56. Eyo, A.: Evidence on use of dynamic purchasing systems in the United Kingdom (UK). Public Procurement Law Rev. 6, 237–248 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  57. Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 2014 on electronic identification and trust services for electronic transactions in the internal market and repealing Directive 1999/93/EC. (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  58. Lips, S., Vinogradova, N., Krimmer, R., Draheim, D.: Re-Shaping the EU digital identity framework. In: DG.O 2022: The 23rd Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, pp. 13–21. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  59. A trusted and secure European e-ID - Evaluation of the Regulation | Shaping Europe’s digital future. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/trusted-and-secure-european-e-id-evaluation-regulation

  60. Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the COUNCIL AMENDING REGULATION (EU) No 910/2014 as regards establishing a framework for a European Digital Identity (2021)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas Schmitz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Schmitz, A., Siapera, M., Prentza, A., Wimmer, M.A. (2023). Harmonization in eProcurement: Design of a Holistic Solution Model for Pre-award Procedures. In: Lindgren, I., et al. Electronic Government. EGOV 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14130. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41138-0_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41138-0_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-41137-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-41138-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics