Skip to main content

The Maturity of Knowledge-Based Management in Finnish Central-Government Organizations: The Need for Managing the Knowledge-Based Management

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Electronic Government (EGOV 2023)

Abstract

Assessing the maturity of knowledge-based management (KBM) in public sector organizations is crucial for several reasons. Firstly, it helps identifying strengths and weaknesses, which enables organizations to improve their knowledge management practices. Secondly, it serves as a standard for evaluating the effectiveness of knowledge resource management, which can enhance decision-making, problem-solving, and operational efficiency. Thirdly, KBM maturity assessment aids in prioritizing investments, allocating resources, and improving return on investment. Fourthly, evaluating KBM maturity can help identify best practices and lessons learned, leading to better knowledge management practices across organizations. Finally, studying KBM maturity can demonstrate an organization’s commitment to effective knowledge management, increasing transparency and accountability. This study assesses the maturity of KBM in Finnish Central-Government Organizations by surveying eight organizations and analyzing the data. The study identifies areas that require more attention, where the need of managing the KBM being highlighted as a significant area for improvement. This research provides insights for researchers and practitioners to address KBM themes that need further attention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Boselie, P., Van Harten, J., Veld, M.: A human resource management review on public management and public administration research: stop right there…before we go any further. Public Manag. Rev. 23(4), 483–500 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rosengart, T., Hirsch, B., Nitzl, C.: The effects of legal versus business education on decision making in public administrations with a Weberian tradition. Bus. Res. 12(2), 455–478 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ministry of Finance. Public Service Leadership. https://vm.fi/en/public-service-leadership

  4. Thierauf, R.J.: Effective Business Intelligence Systems. Praeger, Westport (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Birkinshaw, J.: The critical need to reinvent management. Bus. Strategy Rev. 21(1), 4–11 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Nunes, P., Breene, T.: Reinvent your business before it’s too late. Harv. Bus. Rev. 89(1/2), 80–87 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y., Smith, A., Etiemble, F.: The Invincible Company: How to Constantly Reinvent Your Organization with Inspiration from the World’s Best Business Models, vol. 4. Wiley, Hoboken (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bolisani, E., Bratianu, C., Bolisani, E., Bratianu, C.: The emergence of knowledge management. In: Bolisani, E., Bratianu, C. (eds.) Emergent Knowledge Strategies. IAKM, vol. 4, pp. 23–47. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60657-6_2

  9. Dalkir, K.: Knowledge Management in Theory and Practice. MIT Press, Cambridge (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hislop, D., Bosua, R., Helms, R.: Knowledge Management in Organizations: A Critical Introduction. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2018)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Hellsten, P., Myllärniemi, J.: Business intelligence process model revisited (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Grant, R.M.: Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strateg. Manag. J. 17(S2), 109–122 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Myllärniemi, J., Laihonen, H., Karppinen, H., Seppänen, K.: Knowledge management practices in healthcare services. Meas. Bus. Excell. 16(4), 54–65 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Salonius, H., Käpylä, J.: Exploring the requirements of regional knowledge-based management. J. Knowl. Manag. 17, 583–597 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Siuko, V., Myllärniemi, J., Hellsten, P.: Knowledge-based management challenges in the asset life cycle. In: European Conference on Knowledge Management, pp. 1079–1087 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wiig, K.M.: Knowledge management: an introduction and perspective. J. Knowl. Manag. 1(1), 6–14 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Shollo, A., Galliers, R.D.: Towards an understanding of the role of business intelligence systems in organisational knowing. Inf. Syst. J. 26(4), 339–367 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Xie, K., Wu, Y., Xiao, J., Hu, Q.: Value co-creation between firms and customers: the role of big data-based cooperative assets. Inf. Manag. 53(8), 1034–1048 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Laihonen, H., Lonnqvist, A.: Knowledge-based value creation: grasping the intangibility of service operations in Finland. Int. J. Knowl.-Based Dev. 1(4), 331–345 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Siuko, V., Myllärniemi, J., Hellsten, P.: State of knowledge-based management in project networks-case in Finnish infrastructure construction sector (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jääskeläinen, A., et al.: Designing a maturity model for analyzing information and knowledge management in the public sector. VINE J. Inf. Knowl. Manag. Syst. 52(1), 120–140 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Edwards, J.S., Handzic, M., Carlsson, S., Nissen, M.: Knowledge management research & practice: visions and directions. Knowl. Manag. Res. Pract. 1, 49–60 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. De Vries, H., Bekkers, V., Tummers, L.: Innovation in the public sector: a systematic review and future research agenda. Public Adm. 94(1), 146–166 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Higgins, B.: Reinventing Human Services: Community-and Family-Centered Practice. Routledge, Abingdon (2017)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. Hellsten, P., Pekkola, S.: The impact levels of digitalization initiatives. In: IFIP (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Bakıcı, T., Almirall, E., Wareham, J.: A smart city initiative: the case of Barcelona. J. Knowl. Econ. 4, 135–148 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Taylor Buck, N., While, A.: Competitive urbanism and the limits to smart city innovation: the UK Future Cities initiative. Urban Stud. 54(2), 501–519 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Karagoz, Y., Whiteside, N., Korthaus, A.: Context matters: enablers and barriers to knowledge sharing in Australian public sector ICT projects. J. Knowl. Manag. 24(8), 1921–1941 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lecomber, A., Tatnall, A.: Project management for IT professionals: education and training issues. In: Passey, D., Tatnall, A. (eds.) ITEM 2014. IAICT, vol. 444, pp. 12–24. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45770-2_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. Tatnall, A., Davey, B., Dakich, E.: Major eGovernment projects in health, education and transport in Victoria. In: Bled eConference, p. 30 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Lindgren, I., Jansson, G.: Electronic services in the public sector: a conceptual framework. Gov. Inf. Q. 30(2), 163–172 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ylinen, M., Pekkola, S.: Searching Success in a Successful IS Acquisition (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Aichholzer, G., Schmutzer, R.: Organizational challenges to the development of electronic government. In: Proceedings 11th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications, pp. 379–383. IEEE (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Bason, C.: Leading Public Sector Innovation: Co-Creating for a Better Society. Policy Press, Bristol (2018)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  35. Demirkan, H., Spohrer, J.C., Welser, J.J.: Digital innovation and strategic transformation. IT Prof. 18(6), 14–18 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Agutter, C., van Hove, S., Steinberg, R., England, R.: VeriSM-A Service Management Approach for the Digital Age. Van Haren, s-Hertogenbosch (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Wirtz, B.W.: Business model management. Des Von Geschäftsmodellen, vol. 2, no. 1 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Ding, F., Li, D., George, J.F.: Investigating the effects of IS strategic leadership on organizational benefits from the perspective of CIO strategic roles. Inf. Manag. 51(7), 865–879 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Arnaboldi, M., Lapsley, I., Steccolini, I.: Performance management in the public sector: the ultimate challenge. Financ. Account. Manag. 31(1), 1–22 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Moe, C.E.: Research on public procurement of information systems: the need for a process approach. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 34(1), 78 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Beck, D.E., Cowan, C.C.: Spiral Dynamics: Mastering Values, Leadership and Change. Wiley, Hoboken (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Goldfinch, S.: Pessimism, computer failure, and information systems development in the public sector. Public Adm. Rev. 67(5), 917–929 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Baily, P., Farmer, D., Crocker, B., Jessop, D., Jones, D.: Procurement Principles and Management. Pearson Education, London (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Srai, J.S., Lorentz, H.: Developing design principles for the digitalisation of purchasing and supply management. J. Purch. Supply Manag. 25(1), 78–98 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Jalonen, H.: Tiedolla johtamisen näyttämö ja kulissit. Tiedolla Johtaminen Hallinnossa Teor Ja Käytäntöjä 2015, 40–68 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Virtanen, P., Stenvall, J., Rannisto, P.H.: Julkiseen politiikkaan liittyvä oppiminen ja tietoon perustuva päätöksenteko (2015). https://trepo.tuni.fi/handle/10024/101388. Accessed 15 Jun 2023

  47. Gabriš, P., Bielik Marettová, M., Pavlenda, P., Ličko, M., Šujanová, J.: Knowledge management maturity aspects in industrial enterprises (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Suwarsi, S., Harahap, D.A., Amanah, D.: Maturity analysis of knowledge management implementation on organizational performance (survey on state-owned enterprises in Indonesia). J. Contemp. Issues Bus. Gov. 27(2), 5672–5682 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Gastaldi, L., et al.: Measuring the maturity of business intelligence in healthcare: supporting the development of a roadmap toward precision medicine within ISMETT hospital. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 128, 84–103 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Röglinger, M., Pöppelbuß, J., Becker, J.: Maturity models in business process management. Bus. Process Manag. J. 18, 328–346 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Wendler, R.: The maturity of maturity model research: a systematic mapping study. Inf. Softw. Technol. 54(12), 1317–1339 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Hribar Rajterič, I.: Overview of business intelligence maturity models. Manag. J. Contemp. Manag. Issues 15(1), 47–67 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Aho, M.: Konstruktio suorituskyvyn johtamisen kypsyyden arviointiin (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Davenport, T.H., Harris, J.G., Morison, R.: Analytics at Work: Smarter Decisions, Better Results. Harvard Business Press, Brighton (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  55. Creatido 2023. Knowlede-based Management Framework (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  56. Juppo, V.: Muutoksen johtaminen suomalaisessa yliopistouudistuksessa rehtoreiden näkökulmasta (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  57. Ranki, S.: Strateginen johtaminen suomalaisissa korkeakouluissa (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  58. Myllärniemi, J., Helander, N., Pekkola, S.: Challenges in developing data-based value creation. In: International Joint Conference on Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management, pp. 370–376. SCITEPRESS (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  59. Bojesson, C., Fundin, A.: Exploring microfoundations of dynamic capabilities–challenges, barriers and enablers of organizational change. J. Organ. Change Manag. 34(1), 206–222 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  60. Kianto, A., Ritala, P., Spender, J.C., Vanhala, M.: The interaction of intellectual capital assets and knowledge management practices in organizational value creation. J. Intellect. Cap. 15, 362–375 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Gudfinnsson, K., Strand, M., Berndtsson, M.: Analyzing business intelligence maturity. J. Decis. Syst. 24(1), 37–54 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Kulkarni, U., Robles-Flores, J.A., PopoviÄŤ, A.: Business intelligence capability: the effect of top management and the mediating roles of user participation and analytical decision making orientation. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 18(7), 1 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  63. Liebowitz, J., Chan, Y., Jenkin, T., Spicker, D., Paliszkiewicz, J., Babiloni, F.: If numbers could “feel”: how well do executives trust their intuition? VINE J. Inf. Knowl. Manag. Syst. 49, 531–545 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  64. Ransbotham, S., Kiron, D., Prentice, P.K.: Beyond the hype: the hard work behind analytics success. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 57(3), 18 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pasi Raatikainen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

Examples of the questions form theme “The status of KBM.”:

We ask you to evaluate the following knowledge-based management related topics based on your own experiences and conception. (Scale used: 1 = Strongly disagree … 5 = Strongly agree)

7. “I am familiar with our organisation’s knowledge-based management goals” (topic: The role of knowledge-based management in the organisation’s management)

10. “The management of our organisation is committed to developing knowledgebased management" (topic: The role of management in knowledge-based management).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Partanen, E., Raatikainen, P., Hellsten, P., Myllärniemi, J. (2023). The Maturity of Knowledge-Based Management in Finnish Central-Government Organizations: The Need for Managing the Knowledge-Based Management. In: Lindgren, I., et al. Electronic Government. EGOV 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14130. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41138-0_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41138-0_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-41137-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-41138-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics