Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Residents’ Voices on Proposals

Analysing a Participatory Budgeting Project in Seoul Using Topic Modelling

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Electronic Participation (ePart 2023)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 14153))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 317 Accesses

Abstract

In participatory budgeting, citizens submit budget proposals for funding to improve their neighbourhoods. These proposals are publicly accessible and are a crucial source for identifying local problems and preferences. However, they are challenging to comprehend due to the extensive amounts of data involved. This article fills this gap by applying the structural topic model as an automated content analysis method for identifying the major topics and trends in the case of participatory budgeting in Seoul, South Korea. In total, 26,131 proposals submitted from 2013 to 2022 were analysed. The result shows that citizens were concerned about 12 topics under three themes: facility maintenance, community rebuilding, and risk prevention. While community rebuilding topics are decreasing, residents have paid increasing attention to public facilities, traffic, and pollution problems, reflecting topical changes over time. This study contributes by demonstrating the applications of an automated content analysis of extensive citizens’ inputs in democratic processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Elstub, S., Escobar, O. (eds.): Handbook of Democratic Innovation and Governance. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, USA (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sintomer, Y., Herzberg, C., Röcke, A., Allegretti, G.: Transnational models of citizen participation: the case of participatory budgeting. J. Publ. Deliberation. 8, 1–9 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dias, N., Enríquez, S., Cardita, R., Júlio, S.: Participatory Budgeting World Atlas 2020–2021. Oficina, Portugal (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Shin, B., Rask, M., Tuominen, P.: Learning through online participation: a longitudinal analysis of participatory budgeting using Big Data indicators. Inf. Polity. 27, 517–538 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Edelmann, N., Höchtl, B.: e-Participation in Austria: digital agenda Vienna. In: Randma-Liiv, T. Lember, V. (eds.) Engaging Citizens in Policy Making, pp. 225–243. Edward Elgar Publishing (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Höchtl, J., Parycek, P., Schöllhammer, R.: Big Data in the policy cycle: policy decision making in the digital era. J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commer. 26, 147–169 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Johannessen, M.R., Berntzen, L.: A decade of eParticipation research: an overview of the ePart conference 2009–2018. In: Panagiotopoulos, P., et al. (eds.) ePart 2019. LNCS, vol. 11686, pp. 3–14. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27397-2_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Falanga, R., Verheij, J., Bina, O.: Green(er) cities and their citizens: insights from the participatory budget of Lisbon. Sustainability 13, 8243 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Szczepańska, A., Zagroba, M., Pietrzyk, K.: Participatory budgeting as a method for improving public spaces in major polish cities. Soc. Indic Res. 162, 231–252 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kołat, K., Furmankiewicz, M., Kalisiak-Mędelska, M.: What are the needs of city Dwellers in terms of the development of public spaces? A case study of participatory budgeting in Częstochowa, Poland. Int. J. Environ. Res. Publ. Health 19, 5171 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Beauchamp, N.: Modeling and measuring deliberation online. In: Foucault, B., González-Bailón, S. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Networked Communication, pp. 322–349. Oxford University Press, New York (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Romberg, J., Escher, T.: Automated topic categorisationof citizens’ contributions: reducing manual labelling efforts through active learning. In: Janssen, M., et al. (eds.) EGOV 2022. LNCS, vol. 13391, pp. 369–385. Springer, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15086-9_24

  13. Roberts, M.E., Stewart, B.M., Tingley, D., Airoldi, E.M.: The structural topic model and applied social science. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems Workshop on Topic Models: Computation, Application, and Evaluation, pp. 1–20. Harrahs and Harveys, Lake Tahoe (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Roberts, M.E., et al.: Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 58, 1064–1082 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Baiocchi, G., Ganuza, E.: Participatory budgeting as if emancipation mattered. Polit. Soc. 42, 29–50 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bartocci, L., Grossi, G., Mauro, S.G., Ebdon, C.: The journey of participatory budgeting: a systematic literature review and future research directions. Int. Rev. Adm. Sci. 00208523221078938 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Schneider, S.H., Busse, S.: Participatory budgeting in Germany–a review of empirical findings. Int. J. Publ. Adm. 42, 259–273 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rask, M., Ertiö, T.-P., Tuominen, P., Ahonen, V.: The Final Evaluation of the City of Helsinki Participatory Budgeting: OmaStadi 2018–2020. Ministry of Justice and BIBU Project Publications, Helsinki (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Arana-Catania, M., et al.: Citizen participation and machine learning for a better democracy. Digit. Gov. Res. Pract. 2, 1–22 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Fishkin, J.S.: When the People Speak: Deliberative Democracy and Public Consultation. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wesslen, R.: Computer-assisted text analysis for social science: topic models and beyond. arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.11045 (2018)

  22. Statistics Korea: National land status (by administrative district, by owner, by category). https://www.index.go.kr/unity/potal/main/EachDtlPageDetail.do?idx_cd=2728

  23. Statistics Korea: Gross Regional Domestic Product. https://index.go.kr/potal/main/EachDtlPageDetail.do?idx_cd=1008. last Accessed 09 July 2022

  24. Statistics Korea: Key population indicators. https://www.index.go.kr

  25. Kim, Y.: Do council-manager and mayor-council types of city governments manage information systems differently? An empirical test. Int. J. Publ. Adm. 26, 119–134 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Coate, S., Knight, B.: Government form and public spending: theory and evidence from US municipalities. Am. Econ. J. Econ. Policy 3, 82–112 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ministry of the Interior and Safety: Total and net budget. https://lofin.mois.go.kr

  28. Park, J., Keum, J.: Analysis on the institutional, procedural and behavioral constraint of the citizen participatory budget system (CPBS): focused on the case of CPBS of Seoul Metropolitan Government (SMG). Korea J. Local Publ. Finance. 27, 103–139 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lee, S.K.: Policy formulation and implementation on participatory budgeting in Seoul, South Korea. Policy Gov. Rev. 1, 125–137 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Seoul Metropolitan Government: Seoul metropolitan city participatory budgeting management ordinance (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Seoul Metropolitan Government: 2021 Participatory Budgeting White Paper. Seoul Metropolitan Government (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Shybalkina, I.: Toward a positive theory of public participation in government: variations in New York City’s participatory budgeting. Publ. Adm. 100, 841–858 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sroska, J., Pawlica, B., Ufel, W.: Evolution of the civic budget in Poland – towards deliberation or plebiscite? Libron (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Roberts, M.E., Stewart, B.M., Tingley, D.: stm: R package for structural topic models. J. Stat. Softw. 91, 1–40 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Krippendorff, K.: Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Schmiedel, T., Müller, O., Vom Brocke, J.: Topic modeling as a strategy of inquiry in organizational research: a tutorial with an application example on organizational culture. Organ. Res. Methods. 22, 941–968 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. No, W., Hsueh, L.: How a participatory process with inclusive structural design allocates resources toward poor neighborhoods: the case of participatory budgeting in Seoul, South Korea. Int. Rev. Adm. Sci. 88, 663–681 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Seoul Metropolitan Government: Operation of citizen participation budget. Seoul Metropolitan Government (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  39. No, W.: Mandated participatory budgeting in South Korea: issues and challenges. In: No, W., Brennan, A., Schugurensky, D., (eds.) By the People: Participatory Democracy, Civic Engagement, and Citizenship Education, pp. 109–117. Arizona State University (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Seoul Metropolitan Government: Survey on Urban Policy Index (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Ganuza, E., Baiocchi, G.: The power of ambiguity: how participatory budgeting travels the globe. J. Deliberative Democracy 8, 1–12 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland

    Bokyong Shin

Authors
  1. Bokyong Shin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bokyong Shin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Continuing Education Krems, Krems an der Donau, Austria

    Noella Edelmann

  2. Ghent University, Gent, Belgium

    Lieselot Danneels

  3. University of Continuing Education Krems, Krems an der Donau, Austria

    Anna-Sophie Novak

  4. Queen Mary University of London, London, UK

    Panos Panagiotopoulos

  5. Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands

    Iryna Susha

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Shin, B. (2023). Residents’ Voices on Proposals. In: Edelmann, N., Danneels, L., Novak, AS., Panagiotopoulos, P., Susha, I. (eds) Electronic Participation. ePart 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14153. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41617-0_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41617-0_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-41616-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-41617-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships