Abstract
Being involved in all facets of the digital transformation of the public sector, public officials play a pivotal role in successfully pursuing the transformative process. Hence, they must be equipped with the means to actively partake in creating a digitalized public sector, making the acquisition of e-government-competences indispensable. However, we must observe an increasing gap between the degree of required and obtained e-government-competences in the workforce of public sector organizations in developed countries, especially in examples such as Germany. This is also due to public officials being unable to select and attend the individually appropriate continuous education offers for them. To provide a means for structuring the decision-relevant criteria when choosing continuous education offers for e-government-competences, we develop a morphological box depicting the conceptual dimensions for such offers as the main result of this study. To that end, we conducted an in-depth interview study, aggregating the perspectives of relevant stakeholders from the German public sector.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
E.g., see Qualifica Digitalis or eGov-Campus.
- 2.
References
Aikins, S.K., Krane, D.: Are public officials obstacles to citizen-centered e-government? An examination of municipal administrators’ motivations and actions. State Local Gov. Rev. 42(2), 87–103 (2010)
Bailey, C., Zalfan, T., Davis, H.C., Fill, K., Conole, G.: Panning for gold: designing pedagogically-inspired learning nuggets. Source J. Educ. Technol. Soc. 9(1), 113–122 (2006)
Bothe, M., Renz, J., Rohloff, T., Meinel, C.: From MOOCs to Micro Learning Activities. In: Proceedings 2019 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, pp. 280–288 (2019)
Brinkmann, S.: Qualitative Interviewing. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2013)
Brunello, G., Wruuck, P.: Skill shortages and skill mismatch in Europe: A review of the literature. EIB Work, Pap (2019)
Cerasoli, C.P., Alliger, G.M., Donsbach, J.S., Mathieu, J.E., Tannenbaum, S.I., Orvis, K.A.: Antecedents and outcomes of informal learning behaviors: a meta-analysis. J. Bus. Psychol. 33(2), 203–230 (2018)
Chen, J., Fang, B., Zhang, H., Xue, X.: A systematic review for MOOC dropout prediction from the perspective of machine learning, pp. 1–14 (2022)
Chou, T.C., Chen, J.R., Pu, C.K.: Exploring the collective actions of public servants in e-government development. Decis. Support Syst. 45(2), 251–265 (2008)
Couger, J.D., Higgins, L.F., McIntyre, S.C.: (Un)Structured Creativity in Information Systems Organizations. MIS Quart. 17, 375–397 (1993)
De Vos, A., De Hauw, S., Van der Heijden, B.I.: Competency development and career success: the mediating role of employability. J. Vocat. Behav. 79(2), 438–447 (2011)
Dewah, P., Mutula, S.M.: Knowledge retention strategies in public sector organizations: current status in sub-Saharan Africa. Inf. Dev. 32(3), 362–376 (2016)
Distel, B., Ogonek, N., Becker, J.: eGovernment competences revisited - a literature review on necessary competences in a digitalized public sector. In: Proceedings 14th International Conference Wirtschaftsinformatik, pp. 286–300. Siegen (2019)
Egloffstein, M.: Massive open online courses in digital workplace learning. In: Ifenthaler, D. (ed.) Digital Workplace Learning, pp. 149–166. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46215-8_9
Estevez, E., Janowski, T.: Landscaping government chief information officer education. In: 2013 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 1684–1693. IEEE (2013)
Eurostat: share of government employment nearly stable (2020). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/cache/digpub/european_economy/bloc-4d.html?lang=en. Accessed 31 Mar 2023
Fischer, T., Oppl, S., Stabauer, M.: Micro-credential development: tools, methods and concepts supporting the European approach. In: Wirtschaftsinformatik 2022 Proceedings 1 (2022)
Gil-García, J.R., Pardo, T.A.: E-government success factors: mapping practical tools to theoretical foundations. Gov. Inf. Q. 22(2), 187–216 (2005)
Halsbenning, S., Koddebusch, M., Niemann, M., Becker, J.: How to foster e-competence in the public sector? A mixed-method study using the case of BPM. In: EGOV-CeDEM-ePart, pp. 141–151 (2021)
Halsbenning, S., Niemann, M., Distel, B., Becker, J.: Playing (government) seriously: design principles for e-government simulation game platforms. In: Ahlemann, F., Schütte, R., Stieglitz, S. (eds.) WI 2021. LNISO, vol. 48, pp. 73–90. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86800-0_6
Hemker, T., Müller-Török, R., Prosser, A.: Interactive eLearning with ERP Systems Advancing Some Refutable Hypotheses on Interactivity in eLearning. In: Central and Eastern European eDem and eGov Days (CEEeGov), Sept. 22, 23, 2022, Budapest, Hungary 1 (2022)
Hunnius, S., Schuppan, T.: Competency Requirements for Transformational E-Government. In: 2013 46th Hawaii International Conference System Sciences, pp. 1664–1673 (2013)
Hunnius, S., Paulowitsch, B., Schuppan, T.: Does E-Government education meet competency requirements? An analysis of the German university system from international perspective. In: 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference System Sciences, pp. 2116–2123. IEEE (2015)
Janowski, T., Estevez, E., Ojo, A.: Conceptualizing electronic governance education. In: 2012 45th Hawaii international conference on system sciences, pp. 2269–2278. IEEE (2012)
Koddebusch, M., Halsbenning, S., Kruse, P., Räckers, M., Becker, J.: The increasing e-competence gap: developments over the past five years in the German public sector. In: Fui-Hoon Nah, F., Siau, K. (eds) HCI in Business, Government and Organizations. HCII 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 13327, pp. 73–86. Springer, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05544-7_6
Koddebusch, M., Halsbenning, S., Laude, L., Voss, V., Becker, J.: A song of digitization and law: design requirements for a digitization check of the legislative process. In: Electronic Participation 14th IFIP WG 8.5 International Conference ePart 2022, Linköping, Sweden, Sept. 6–8, 2022, Proceedings, pp. 154–170. Springer (2023)
Kresl, P.K.: An aging population and the economic vitality of Pennsylvania’s cities and towns (2010)
Layne, K., Lee, J.: Developing fully functional E-government: a four stage model. Gov. Inf. Q. 18(2), 122–136 (2001)
Lersch, R.: Unterricht und Kompetenzerwerb. In 30 Schritten von der Theorie zur Praxis kompetenzfördernden Unterrichts. Die Deutsche Schule 99(4), 434–446 (2007)
Lindgren, I., Madsen, C.Ø., Hofmann, S., Melin, U.: Close encounters of the digital kind: a research agenda for the digitalization of public services. Gov. Inf. Q. 36(3), 427–436 (2019)
Littenberg-Tobias, J., Reich, J.: Evaluating access, quality, and equity in online learning: a case study of a MOOC-based blended professional degree program. Internet High. Educ. 47, 100759 (2020)
Margaryan, A., Bianco, M., Littlejohn, A.: Instructional quality of massive open online courses (MOOCs). Comput. Educ. 80, 77–83 (2015)
Mayring, P.: Qualitative content analysis: theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution, p. 143 (2014)
Mergel, I.: Kompetenzen für die digitale Transformation der Verwaltung. Innov. Verwaltung 42(4), 34–36 (2020)
Mergel, I., Edelmann, N., Haug, N.: Defining digital transformation: results from expert interviews. Gov. Inf. Q. 36(4), 101385 (2019)
Nordhaug, O.: Human Capital in Organizations: Competence, Training, and Learning. Scandinavian University Press, Oslo (1993)
Norris, D.F., Moon, M.J.: Advancing E-government at the grassroots: tortoise or hare? Public Adm. Rev. 65(1), 64–75 (2005)
OECD: Recognition of non-formal and informal learning - home. https://www.oecd.org/education/skills-beyond-school/recognitionofnon-formalandinformallearning-home.htm. Accessed 31 Mar 2023
Ogonek, N.: The tale of e-government: a review of the stories that have been told so far and what is yet to come. In: Proceedings 50th Hawaii International Conference System Sciences, pp. 2468–2477. IEEE, Manoa, Hawaii (2017)
Ogonek, N., Hofmann, S.: Governments’ need for digitization skills: understanding and shaping vocational training in the public sector. Int. J. Public Adm. Digit. Age 5(4), 61–75 (2018)
Ogonek, N., Räckers, M., Becker, J.: How to master the “E”: tools for competence identification, provision and preservation in a digitalized public sector. In: Proceedings 12th International Conference Theory Practice Electronic Governance, pp. 56–64 (2019)
Rhodes, R.A.W.: Recovering the craft of public administration. Public Adm. Rev. 76(4), 638–647 (2016)
Ritchey, T.: Wicked problems-social messes: Decision support modelling with morphological analysis, vol. 17. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19653-9
Rosemann, M., Becker, J., Chasin, F.: City 5.0. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 63(1), 71–77 (2021)
Rowley, J.: Conducting research interviews. Manag. Res. Rev. 35(3/4), 260–271 (2012)
Rusaw, A.C., Fisher, V.D.: Promoting training and professional development in government: the origins and early contributions of SPOD. Public Adm. Quart. 41, 216–232 (2017)
Sarantis, D., Dhaou, S.B., Alexopoulos, C., Ronzhyn, A., Mureddu, F.: Digital governance education: survey of the programs and curricula. Public Adm. Inf. Technol. 38, 101–119 (2022)
Schenk, B., Dolata, M.: Facilitating digital transformation through education: a case study in the public administration. In: Proceedings 53rd Hawaii International Conference System Sciences (2020)
Smith, D.A.: An overview of training in the public sector. Working Perspective Education Training, pp. 151–170 (1981)
Spector, J.M.: Remarks on MOOCS and Mini-MOOCS. Education Tech. Research Dev. 62(3), 385–392 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-014-9339-4
Stern, S., et al.: Die Besten, bitte: Wie der öffentliche Sektor als Arbeitgeber punkten kann. Tech. rep., McKinsey & Company (2019)
United Nations: E-Government Survey 2022: The Future of Digital Government (2022)
Weinert, F.E.: Vergleichende Leistungsmessung in Schulen - eine umstrittene Selbstverständlichkeit. In: Leistungsmessungen in Schulen, pp. 17–32. Beltz (2002)
Zhang, J., West, R.E.: Designing microlearning instruction for professional development through a competency based approach. TechTrends 64(2), 310–318 (2020)
Zhu, M., Sari, A.R., Lee, M.M.: A comprehensive systematic review of MOOC research: research techniques, topics, and trends from 2009 to 2019. Educational Technology Research Development, pp. 1–26 (2020)
Zwicky, F.: Discovery, Invention. Research Through the Morphological Approach, Macmillan (1969)
Acknowledgements
This research article has received funding from the projects DFG FOR3539 (GZ: BE 1422/28-1 & GZ: PA 1771/3-1) and the German IT Planning Council / FITKO eGov-Campus 2023 (FI-50/043/001-012023).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Koelmann, H., Koddebusch, M., Bücker, J., Egloffstein, M., Becker, J. (2023). Structuring Continuous Education Offers for E-Government-Competence Acquisition: A Morphological Box. In: Edelmann, N., Danneels, L., Novak, AS., Panagiotopoulos, P., Susha, I. (eds) Electronic Participation. ePart 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14153. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41617-0_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41617-0_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-41616-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-41617-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)