Skip to main content

From Integration to Data Sharing - How Developers Subvert the Public Sector

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Electronic Participation (ePart 2023)

Abstract

This paper explores how organizations expand data-sharing capabilities beyond the loci of emergence. This inquiry was ignited from an observation that external developer practices had subverted a public sector organization into developing transformational data-sharing capabilities that effectively replaced existing integration practices within the agency. To detail and explain how the administration was able to draw on the practices and platforms established for an external context in an organizational (internal) context, we analyzed our empirical dataset using dynamic capabilities theory. By unpacking enabling microfoundations and overarching capabilities, we could explain our observations and put forward six microfoundations that underpin three data-sharing capabilities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    In framing this concept, we took inspiration from the ecosystem carryover [40] concept. However, while the original concept concerned utilizing existing ecosystems in new contexts, in our case it was the underlying logics that was replicated.

References

  1. Mergel, I.: Digital service teams in government. Gov. Inform. Q. 36, 101389 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bason, C.: Leading Public Sector Innovation 2E Co-creating for a Better Society. Policy Press, Chicago (2018)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Gil-Garcia, J.R., Helbig, N., Ojo, A.: Being smart: emerging technologies and innovation in the public sector. Gov. Inform. Q. 31, I1–I8 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Parker, G., Alstyne, M.W.V., Jiang, X.: Platform ecosystems: how developers invert the firm. Manag. Inf. Syst. Q. 41, 255–266 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tiwana, A.: Platform Ecosystems: Aligning Architecture, Governance, and Strategy. MK, Amsterdam; Waltham, MA (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wirtz, B.W., Daiser, P.: A meta-analysis of empirical e-government research and its future research implications. Int. Rev. Adm. Sci. 84, 144–163 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mergel, I., Edelmann, N., Haug, N.: Defining digital transformation: results from expert interviews. Gov. Inf. Q. 36, 101385 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gil-Garcia, J.R., Sayogo, D.S.: Government inter-organizational information sharing initiatives: understanding the main determinants of success. Gov. Inf. Q. 33, 572–582 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang, F.: Understanding the dynamic mechanism of interagency government data sharing. Gov. Inf. Q. 35, 536–546 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Scholl, H.J. (Jochen), Klischewski, R.: E-government integration and interoperability: framing the research agenda. Int. J. Public Admin. 30, 889–920 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Eriksson, O., Ågerfalk, P.J.: Speaking things into existence: ontological foundations of identity representation and management. Inf. Syst. J. 32, 33–60 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Karlsson, F., Frostenson, M., Prenkert, F., Kolkowska, E., Helin, S.: Inter-organisational information sharing in the public sector: a longitudinal case study on the reshaping of success factors. Gov. Inf. Q. 34, 567–577 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Janssen, M., Estevez, E.: Lean government and platform-based governance—doing more with less. Gov. Inf. Q. 30, S1–S8 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Baldwin, C.Y., Woodard, C.J.: The architecture of platforms: a unified view. In: Gawer, A. (ed.) Platforms, Markets and Innovation (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Parker, G., Alstyne, M.V., Choudary, S.P.: Platform Revolution: How Networked Markets are Transforming the Economy and How to Make Them Work for You. W.W. Norton & Company, New York (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Huang, J., Henfridsson, O., Liu, M.J., Newell, S.: Growing on steroids: rapidly scaling the user base of digital ventures through digital innovation. Mis. Quart. 41, 301–314 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tiwana, A.: Platform desertion by app developers. J. Manage. Inf. Syst. 32, 40–77 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wareham, J., Fox, P.B., Giner, J.L.C.: Technology ecosystem governance. Organ. Sci. 25, 1195–1215 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Baldwin, C.Y.: Where do transactions come from? Modularity, transactions, and the boundaries of firms. Ind. Corp. Change. 17, 155–195 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Foerderer, J., Kude, T., Schuetz, S.W., Heinzl, A.: Knowledge boundaries in enterprise software platform development: antecedents and consequences for platform governance. Inf. Syst. J. 29, 119–144 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Jussen, I., Schweihoff, J., Dahms, V., Möller, F., Otto, B.: Data sharing fundamentals: characteristics and definition (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Teece, D.J., Pisano, G., Shuen, A.: Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Manage J. 18, 509–533 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hansen, J.R., Ferlie, E.: Applying strategic management theories in public sector organizations: developing a typology. Public Manag. Rev. 18, 1–19 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Pablo, A.L., Reay, T., Dewald, J.R., Casebeer, A.L.: Identifying, enabling and managing dynamic capabilities in the public sector*. J. Manage. Stud. 44, 687–708 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Rose, J., Persson, J.S., Heeager, L.T., Irani, Z.: Managing e-Government: value positions and relationships. Inf. Syst. J. 25, 531–571 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Toll, D., Lindgren, I., Melin, U., Madsen, C.Ø.: Artificial intelligence in Swedish policies: values, benefits, considerations and risks. In: Lindgren, I., et al. (eds.) EGOV 2019. LNCS, vol. 11685, pp. 301–310. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27325-5_23

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Barrutia, J.M., Echebarria, C., Aguado-Moralejo, I., Apaolaza-Ibáñez, V., Hartmann, P.: Leading smart city projects: government dynamic capabilities and public value creation. Technol. Forecast. Soc. 179, 121679 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Teece, D.J.: Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic. Manage. J. 28, 1319–1350 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Helfat, C.E., Raubitschek, R.S.: Dynamic and integrative capabilities for profiting from innovation in digital platform-based ecosystems. Res. Policy. 47, 1391–1399 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Eisenhardt, K.M., Martin, J.A.: Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strategic Manage. J. 21, 1105–1121 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Janssen, M., van der Voort, H.: Adaptive governance: towards a stable, accountable and responsive government. Gov. Inf. Q. 33, 1–5 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Baden-Fuller, C., Teece, D.J.: Market sensing, dynamic capability, and competitive dynamics. Ind. Market Manag. 89, 105–106 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Mero, J., Haapio, H.: An effectual approach to executing dynamic capabilities under unexpected uncertainty. Ind. Market Manag. 107, 82–91 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Sarasvathy, S.D.: Causation and effectuation: toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Acad. Manage. Rev. 26, 243–263 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Dubois, A., Gadde, L.-E.: Systematic combining: an abductive approach to case research. J. Bus. Res. 55, 553–560 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Alvesson, M., Kärreman, D.: Constructing mystery: empirical matters in theory development. Acad. Manage. Rev. 32, 1265–1281 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Breznitz, D., Ornston, D.: The revolutionary power of peripheral agencies. Comput. Polit. Stud. 46, 1219–1245 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Daniel, E.M., Wilson, H.N.: The role of dynamic capabilities in e-business transformation. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 12, 282–296 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Parker, G., Alstyne, M.W.V., Jiang, X.: Platform ecosystems: how developers invert the firm. SSRN Electron. J. 41, 255–266 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Adner, R.: The Wide Lens: A New Strategy for Innovation. Portfolio/Penguin, New York (2012)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Rudmark .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Rudmark, D., Molin, A. (2023). From Integration to Data Sharing - How Developers Subvert the Public Sector. In: Edelmann, N., Danneels, L., Novak, AS., Panagiotopoulos, P., Susha, I. (eds) Electronic Participation. ePart 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14153. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41617-0_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41617-0_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-41616-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-41617-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics