Abstract
Alignments provide sophisticated diagnostics that pinpoint deviations in a trace with respect to a process model. One crucial aspect is to consider, in the alignment task, not only the control flow perspective but also other sources of information available in event logs like data payloads. However, the combination of these dimensions makes the problem of multi-perspective trace alignment highly challenging since the number of traces accepted by the model is typically infinite. In this paper, we address this problem by proposing an approximate approach to alignment computation: instead of computing the optimal alignments based on the complete knowledge about a process trace available in the log, we perform approximate alignments based on lossy trace encodings that only consider certain information about the trace. The advantage of this approach is twofold. First, the trace alignment task is much faster. Second, the analyst can choose what type of information is relevant for computing the alignments by selecting the encodings that represent a trace based on that information. Our experiments show that the approximate approach is faster than the optimal one and, for encodings sufficiently rich, able to provide accurate results.
This research has been partially supported by the Italian Ministry of University and Research (MUR) under the PRIN project PINPOINT Prot. 2020FNEB27, and by the Free University of Bozen-Bolzano with the ADAPTERS and CAT projects.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bauer, M., van der Aa, H., Weidlich, M.: Sampling and approximation techniques for efficient process conformance checking. Inf. Syst. 104, 101666 (2022)
Carmona, J., van Dongen, B.F., Solti, A., Weidlich, M.: Conformance Checking - Relating Processes and Models. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99414-7
Felli, P., Gianola, A., Montali, M., Rivkin, A., Winkler, S.: CoCoMoT: conformance checking of multi-perspective processes via SMT. In: Proceedings of BPM 2021 (2021)
Felli, P., Gianola, A., Montali, M., Rivkin, A., Winkler, S.: Conformance checking with uncertainty via SMT. In: Proceedings of BPM 2022 (2022)
Felli, P., Gianola, A., Montali, M., Rivkin, A., Winkler, S.: Data-aware conformance checking with SMT. Inf. Syst. 117 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.is.2023.102230
Gärtner, T., Flach, P., Wrobel, S.: On graph kernels: hardness results and efficient alternatives. In: Proceedings of COLT 2003 (2003)
Lee, W.L.J., Verbeek, H., Munoz-Gama, J., van der Aalst, W.M., Sepúlveda, M.: Recomposing conformance: closing the circle on decomposed alignment-based conformance checking in process mining. Inf. Sci. 466, 55–91 (2018)
de Leoni, M., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Data-aware process mining: discovering decisions in processes using alignments. In: Proceedings of 13th SAC. ACM (2013)
de Leoni, M., van der Aalst, W.M.P., van Dongen, B.F.: Data- and resource-aware conformance checking of business processes. In: Proceedings of BIS 2012 (2012)
de Leoni, M., Felli, P., Montali, M.: A holistic approach for soundness verification of decision-aware process models. In: Proceedings of 37th ER (2018)
de Leoni, M., Felli, P., Montali, M.: Integrating BPMN and DMN: modeling and analysis. J. Data Semant. 10(1), 165–188 (2021)
Leontjeva, A., Conforti, R., Di Francescomarino, C., Dumas, M., Maggi, F.M.: Complex symbolic sequence encodings for predictive monitoring of business processes. In: Proceedings of BPM 2015 (2015)
Liu, T., Moore, A.W., Gray, A., Cardie, C.: New algorithms for efficient high-dimensional nonparametric classification. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 7(6) (2006)
Lodhi, H., Saunders, C., Shawe-Taylor, J., Cristianini, N., Watkins, C.J.C.H.: Text classification using string kernels. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2, 419–444 (2002)
Mannhardt, F.: Sepsis cases - event log (2016). https://data.4tu.nl/articles/dataset/Sepsis_Cases_-_Event_Log/12707639/1
Mannhardt, F.: Multi-perspective process mining. Ph.D. thesis, Technical University of Eindhoven (2018)
Mannhardt, F., de Leoni, M., Reijers, H., van der Aalst, W.: Balanced multi-perspective checking of process conformance. Computing 98(4), 407–437 (2016)
Schuster, D., van Zelst, S., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Alignment approximation for process trees. In: Leemans, S., Leopold, H. (eds.) ICPM 2020. LNBIP, vol. 406, pp. 247–259. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72693-5_19
Taymouri, F., Carmona, J.: A recursive paradigm for aligning observed behavior of large structured process models. In: Proceedings of BPM 2016 (2016)
Taymouri, F., Carmona, J.: Model and event log reductions to boost the computation of alignments. In: Ceravolo, P., Guetl, C., Rinderle-Ma, S. (eds.) SIMPDA 2016. LNBIP, vol. 307, pp. 1–21. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74161-1_1
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Gianola, A., Ko, J., Maggi, F.M., Montali, M., Winkler, S. (2023). Approximating Multi-perspective Trace Alignment Using Trace Encodings. In: Di Francescomarino, C., Burattin, A., Janiesch, C., Sadiq, S. (eds) Business Process Management. BPM 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14159. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41620-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41620-0_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-41619-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-41620-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)