Skip to main content

Realistic Pedestrian Behaviour in the CARLA Simulator Using VR and Mocap

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computer-Human Interaction Research and Applications (CHIRA 2021, CHIRA 2022)

Abstract

Simulations are gaining increasingly significance in the field of autonomous driving due to the demand for rapid prototyping and extensive testing. Employing physics-based simulation brings several benefits at an affordable cost, while mitigating potential risks to prototypes, drivers, and vulnerable road users. However, there exit two primary limitations. Firstly, the reality gap which refers to the disparity between reality and simulation and prevents the simulated autonomous driving systems from having the same performance in the real world. Secondly, the lack of empirical understanding regarding the behavior of real agents, such as backup drivers or passengers, as well as other road users such as vehicles, pedestrians, or cyclists. Agent simulation is commonly implemented through deterministic or randomized probabilistic pre-programmed models, or generated from real-world data; but it fails to accurately represent the behaviors adopted by real agents while interacting within a specific simulated scenario. This paper extends the description of our proposed framework to enable real-time interaction between real agents and simulated environments, by means immersive virtual reality and human motion capture systems within the CARLA simulator for autonomous driving. We have designed a set of usability examples that allow the analysis of the interactions between real pedestrians and simulated autonomous vehicles and we provide a first measure of the user’s sensation of presence in the virtual environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kalra, N., Paddock, S.M.: Driving to safety: how many miles of driving would it take to demonstrate autonomous vehicle reliability? RAND Corporation, Research report (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fernández-Llorca, D., Gómez, E.: Trustworthy artificial intelligence requirements in the autonomous driving domain. Computer 56(2), 29–39 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2022.3212091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Izquierdo Gonzalo, R., Salinas Maldonado, C., Alonso Ruiz, J., Parra Alonso, I., Fernández Llorca, D., Sotelo, M.Á.: Testing predictive automated driving systems: lessons learned and future recommendations. IEEE Intell. Transp. Syst. Mag. 14(6), 77–93 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/MITS.2022.3170649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Stocco, A., Pulfer, B., Tonella, P.: Mind the gap! a study on the transferability of virtual vs physical-world testing of autonomous driving systems. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng., 1–13 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2022.3202311

  5. García Daza, I., Izquierdo, R., Martínez, L.M., Benderius, O., Fernández Llorca, D.: Sim-to-real transfer and reality gap modeling in model predictive control for autonomous driving. Appl. Intell. 53, 12719–12735 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-022-04148-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Eady, T.: Simulations can’t solve autonomous driving because they lack important knowledge about the real world - large-scale real world data is the only way (2019). https://medium.com/@trenteady/simulation-cant-solve-autonomous-driving-because-it-lacks-necessary-empirical-knowledge-403feeec15e0. Accessed 8 Apr 2022

  7. Dosovitskiy, A., Ros, G., Codevilla, F., Lopez, A., Koltun, V.: CARLA: an open Urban driving simulator. In: Proceedings of the 1st Annual Conference on Robot Learning, pp. 1–16 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Martín Serrano, S., Fernández Llorca, D., García Daza, I., Sotelo, M.A.: Insertion of real agents behaviors in CARLA autonomous driving simulator. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Computer-Human Interaction Research and Applications, CHIRA 2022, pp. 23–31 (2022). https://doi.org/10.5220/0011352400003323

  9. Menolotto, M., Komaris, D., Tedesco, S., O’Flynn, B., Walsh, M.: Motion capture technology in industrial applications: a systematic review. Sensors 20(19), 5687 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/s20195687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Noitom (2022). https://neuronmocap.com/perception-neuron-studio-system. Accessed 22 Mar 2023

  11. Movard (2023). https://www.movard.es/productos/xsens/. Accessed 22 Mar 2023

  12. Serrano, S.M, Izquierdo, R., García Daza, I., Sotelo, M.Á., Fernández Llorca, D.: Digital twin in virtual reality for human-vehicle interactions in the context of autonomous driving (2023). arXiv:2303.11463

  13. OpenStreetMap. https://www.openstreetmap.org/about. Accessed 23 Mar 2023

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by Research Grants PID2020-114924RB-I00 and PDC2021-121324-I00 (Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation) and partially by S2018/EMT-4362 SEGVAUTO 4.0-CM (Community of Madrid). D. Fernández Llorca acknowledges funding from the HUMAINT project by the Directorate-General Joint Research Centre of the European Commission.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sergio Martín Serrano .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Ethics declarations

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this article are purely those of the authors and may not, under any circumstances, be regarded as an official position of the European Commission.

Appendix A

Appendix A

1.1 Self-presence Scale Items

To what extent did you feel that\(\ldots \) (1 =  not at all - 5 very strongly)

  1. 1.

    You could move the avatar’s hands.

  2. 2.

    The avatar’s displacement was your own displacement.

  3. 3.

    The avatar’s body was your own body.

  4. 4.

    If something happened to the avatar, it was happening to you.

  5. 5.

    The avatar was you.

1.2 Autonomous Vehicle Presence Scale Items

To what extent did you feel that\(\ldots \) (1 =  not at all - 5 very strongly)

  1. 1.

    The vehicle was present.

  2. 2.

    The vehicle dynamics and its movement were natural.

  3. 3.

    The sound of the vehicle helped you to locate it.

  4. 4.

    The vehicle was aware of your presence.

  5. 5.

    The vehicle was real.

1.3 Environmental Presence Scale Items

To what extent did you feel that\(\ldots \) (1 =  not at all - 5 very strongly)

  1. 1.

    You were really in front of a pedestrian crossing.

  2. 2.

    The road signs and traffic lights were real.

  3. 3.

    You really crossed the pedestrian crossing.

  4. 4.

    The urban environment seemed like the real world.

  5. 5.

    It could reach out and touch the objects in the urban environment.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Serrano, S.M., Llorca, D.F., Daza, I.G., Sotelo, M.Á. (2023). Realistic Pedestrian Behaviour in the CARLA Simulator Using VR and Mocap. In: Holzinger, A., da Silva, H.P., Vanderdonckt, J., Constantine, L. (eds) Computer-Human Interaction Research and Applications. CHIRA CHIRA 2021 2022. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1882. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41962-1_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41962-1_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-41961-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-41962-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics