Skip to main content

Abstract

The paper presents an approach to understanding the emergent dynamics of human-robot interaction in the specific case of a humanoid robot taking the role of a co-therapist to the human therapist in psychosocial rehabilitation by focusing on the nonverbal communication in these sessions. The intention is to eliminate the negative effects of reactance to the robot by employing the SociBot platform, which has been designed with enhanced facial features. An empirical study is performed to investigate implicit aspects of perceiving faces of different modality. The results show that viewers assess differently the positive and negative features, which could be attributed to the presented faces – human, android or robotic (machine-looking). At the same time, no effect of type of face on the feature assessment process was observed. Some implications for using robots as co-therapists are briefly discussed as an emerging interactive technology in support of people with special needs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt.

References

  1. Chaturvedi, S.K.: Covid-19, coronavirus and mental health rehabilitation at times of crisis. J. Psychosoc. Rehabil. Ment. Health 7, 1–2 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Utami, D., Bickmore, T.: Collaborative user responses in multiparty interaction with a couples counselor robot. In: 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), pp. 294–303 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Utami, D., Bickmore, T.W., Kruger, L.J.: A robotic couples counselor for promoting positive communication. In: 2017 26th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), pp. 248–255 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jokinen, K., Wilcock, G.: Constructive interaction for talking about interesting topics. In: LREC, pp. 404–410 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kelley, M.S., Noah, J.A., Zhang, X., Scassellati, B., Hirsch, J.: Comparison of human social brain activity during eye-contact with another human and a humanoid robot. Front. Robot. AI 7, 599581 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ghazali, A.S., Ham, J., Barakova, E., Markopoulos, P.: The influence of social cues in persuasive social robots on psychological reactance and compliance. Comput. Hum. Behav. 87, 58–65 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ghazali, A.S., Ham, J., Barakova, E., Markopoulos, P.: Assessing the effect of persuasive robots interactive social cues on users’ psychological reactance, liking, trusting beliefs and compliance. Adv. Robot. 33(7–8), 325–337 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Benson, L.A., McGinn, M.M., Christensen, A.: Common principles of couple therapy. Behav. Ther. 43(1), 25–35 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hall, J., Taylor, K.: The emergence of Eric: co-therapy in the treatment of a family with a disabled child. Fam. Process 10(1), 85–96 (1971)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rice, D.G., Fey, W.F., Kepecs, J.G.: Therapist experience and “style” as factors in co-therapy. Fam. Process 11(1), 1–2 (1972)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Barakova, E.I., Gillesen, J.C.C., Huskens, B.E.B.M., Lourens, T.: End-user programming architecture facilitates the uptake of robots in social therapies. Robot. Auton. Syst. 61(7), 704–713 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ozaeta, L., Graña, M., Dimitrova, M., Krastev, A.: Child oriented storytelling with NAO robot in hospital environment: preliminary application results. Prob. Eng. Cybern. Robot. 69, 21–29 (2016). https://www.iict.bas.bg/pecr/2018/69/3-StorytellingNAOpaper.pdf

  13. Ali, S., Mehmood, F., Ayaz, Y., Khan, M.J., Sadia, H., Nawaz, R.: Comparing the effectiveness of different reinforcement stimuli in a robotic therapy for children with ASD. IEEE Access 8, 13128–13137 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Crum, J., et al.: An approach to neuroimaging interpersonal interactions in mental health interventions. Biol. Psychiatry Cognit. Neurosci. Neuroimaging 7(7), 669–679 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Liberman, R.P., DeRisi, W.J., Mueser, K.T.: Social Skills Training for Psychiatric Patients. Pergamon Press, New York (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Moore, R.: A Bayesian explanation of the ‘Uncanny Valley’ effect and related psychological phenomena. Sci. Rep. 2, 864 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Dimitrova, M. Wagatsuma, H.: Designing humanoid robots with novel roles and social abilities. Lovotics 3(112), 2 (2015). https://www.omicsonline.org/open-access/designing-humanoid-robots-with-novel-roles-and-social-abilities-2090-9888-1000112.php?aid=67398

  18. Ghiță, A.Ș., et al.: The AMIRO social robotics framework: deployment and evaluation on the pepper robot. Sensors 20(24), 7271 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jokinen, K., Wilcock, G.: Multimodal open-domain conversations with the Nao robot. In: Mariani, J., Rosset, S., Garnier-Rizet, M., Devillers, L. (eds.) Natural Interaction with Robots, Knowbots and Smartphones, pp. 213–224. Springer, New York (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8280-2_19

  20. Filippini, C., Perpetuini, D., Cardone, D., Merla, A.: Improving human–robot interaction by enhancing NAO robot awareness of human facial expression. Sensors 21(19), 6438 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Admoni, H., Bank, C., Tan, J., Toneva, M., Scassellati, B.: Robot gaze does not reflexively cue human attention. In: Proceedings 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society CogSci 2011, Austin TX USA, 2011, pp. 1983–1988 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Esfandbod, A., Nourbala, A., Rokhi, Z., Meghdari, A.F., Taheri, A., Alemi, M.: Design, manufacture, and acceptance evaluation of APO: a lip-syncing social robot developed for lip-reading training programs. Int. J. Soc. Robot., 1–15 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Moubayed, S.A., Skantze, G., Beskow, J.: The furhat back-projected humanoid head–lip reading, gaze and multi-party interaction. Int. J. Humanoid Robot. 10(01), 1350005 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Steindl, C., Jonas, E., Sittenthaler, S., Traut-Mattausch, E., Greenberg, J.: Understanding psychological reactance: new developments and findings. Zeitschrift für Psychologie 223(4), 205–214 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Mori, M.: The uncanny valley: the original essay by Masahiro Mori. IEEE Spectrum (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Said, C.P., Sebe, N., Todorov, A.: Structural resemblance to emotional expressions predicts evaluation of emotionally neutral faces. Emotion 9(2), 260–264 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Burleigh, T.J., Schoenherr, J.R.: A reappraisal of the uncanny valley: categorical perception or frequency-based sensitization? Front. Psychol. 5, 1488 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors express their gratitude to actress Mrs. Violina Vasileva-Alexandrova for participating in the video as the human agent, and Ms. Gagandeep Kaur for her help in the design of the stimulus. The research, leading to these results, has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under Grant Agreement No. 730994 (TERRINet), the Research Fund of Bulgaria for projects №. KP-06-H42/4 (2020-2023), No. KP-06-ПH57/28 (2021–2024) and OP Science and Education for Smart Growth (2014–2020) for project Competence Center “Intelligent mechatronic, eco- and energy saving systems and technologies” BG05M2OP001-1.002-0023.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maya Dimitrova .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Dimitrova, M., Garate, V.R., Withey, D., Harper, C. (2023). Implicit Aspects of the Psychosocial Rehabilitation with a Humanoid Robot. In: Kubincová, Z., Caruso, F., Kim, Te., Ivanova, M., Lancia, L., Pellegrino, M.A. (eds) Methodologies and Intelligent Systems for Technology Enhanced Learning, Workshops - 13th International Conference. MIS4TEL 2023. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 769. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42134-1_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics