Skip to main content

Abstract

The use of emerging technologies such as Artificial Intelligence, Augmented Reality, and 3D printing are amongst the EU targeted actions for supporting the digital transformation of education. Yet, despite these technologies being accessible to education stakeholders, there is a lack of concrete pedagogy and teachers’ professional development for their meaningful integration into the current educational context. Extending Design Thinking with Emerging Digital Technologies – Exten (D.T.)2 - is a European funded project aiming to use emerging technologies to enhance the pedagogical value, sustainable digitization, and potential for wide deployment of Design Thinking (DT). DT is a promising pedagogical innovation, based on interdisciplinary co-creation, that can lead to sustainable educational innovation and development of students’ 21st century skills. In this paper, we describe the main components of the proposed educational transformation as developed during the first year of Exten (D.T.)2 including the theoretical foundations of the approach, the co-creation processes for meaningful engagement of teachers with educational innovation. Moreover, we present the educational technology tools (design, extensions, architecture) that are used in the project and the evaluation approach for capturing impact on improving students’ skills and competencies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Barab, S., Squire, K.: Design-based research: putting a stake in the ground. J. Learn. Sci. 13(1), 1–14 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bray, A., Byrne, P., O’Kelly, M.: A short instrument for measuring students’ confidence with ‘key skills’(sicks): development, validation and initial results. Thinking Skills and Creativity 37, 100700 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brown, T.: Design thinking, harvard business review (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Buhl, A., et al.: Design thinking for sustainability: why and how design thinking can foster sustainability-oriented innovation development. J. Clean. Prod. 231, 1248–1257 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Campbell, H., Vanderhoven, D.: Knowledge that matters: realising the potential of co-production (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chiu, J.L., et al.: WISEngineering: supporting precollege engineering design and mathematical understanding. Comput. Educ. 67, 142–155 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Christensen, K.S., Hjorth, M., Iversen, O.S., Smith, R.C.: Understanding design literacy in middle-school education: assessing students’ stances towards inquiry. Int. J. Technol. Des. Educ. 29, 633–654 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cutumisu, M., Schwartz, D.L., Lou, N.M.: The relation between academic achievement and the spontaneous use of design-thinking strategies. Comput. Educ. 149, 103806 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dragičević, N., Vladova, G., Ullrich, A.: Design thinking capabilities in the digital world: a bibliometric analysis of emerging trends. Front. Educ. 7, 1012478 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.1012478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fairman, J.C., Mackenzie, S.V.: Spheres of teacher leadership action for learning. Prof. Dev. Educ. 38(2), 229–246 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gennari, R., Melonio, A., Rizvi, M.: From children’s ideas to prototypes for the internet of things: a case study of cross-generational end-user design. Behav. Inf. Technol. 41(15), 3281–3300 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Goldman, S., Carroll, M., Royalty, A.: Destination, imagination & the fires within: Design thinking in a middle school classroom. In: Proceedings of the Seventh ACM Conference on Creativity and Cognition, pp. 371–372 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gross, K., Gross, S.: Transformation: constructivism, design thinking, and elementary steam. Art Educ. 69(6), 36–43 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hatzigianni, M., Stevenson, M., Falloon, G., Bower, M., Forbes, A.: Young children’s design thinking skills in makerspaces. Int. J. Child-Comput. Interact. 27, 100216 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Huang, C.Y., Wang, J.C.: Effectiveness of a three-dimensional-printing curriculum: developing and evaluating an elementary school design-oriented model course. Comput. Educ. 187, 104553 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kafai, Y.B., Burke, Q.: Computational participation: teaching kids to create and connect through code. In: Rich, P.J., Hodges, C.B. (eds.) Emerging research, practice, and policy on computational thinking. ECTII, pp. 393–405. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52691-1_24

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Koh, J.H.L., Chai, C.S., Benjamin, W., Hong, H.Y.: Technological pedagogical content knowledge (tpack) and design thinking: a framework to support ICT lesson design for 21st century learning. Asia Pac. Educ. Res. 24, 535–543 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kynigos, C., Grizioti, M., Gkreka, C.: Studying real-world societal problems in a stem context through robotics. arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.03245 (2018)

  19. Landwehr Sydow, S., Åkerfeldt, A., Falk, P.: Becoming a maker pedagogue: exploring practices of making and developing a maker mindset for preschools. In: FabLearn Europe/MakeEd 2021-An International Conference on Computing, Design and Making in Education, pp. 1–10 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Laru, J., et al.: Designing seamless learning activities for school visitors in the context of fab lab oulu. In: Looi, C.-K., Wong, L.-H., Glahn, C., Cai, S. (eds.) seamless learning. LNET, pp. 153–169. Springer, Singapore (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3071-1_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Lee, J.J., Jaatinen, M., Salmi, A., Mattelmäki, T., Smeds, R., Holopainen, M.: Design choices framework for co-creation projects. International J. Des. 12(2) (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Leinonen, T., Virnes, M., Hietala, I., Brinck, J.: 3d printing in the wild: adopting digital fabrication in elementary school education. Int. J. Art Des. Educ. 39(3), 600–615 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Li, T., Zhan, Z.: A systematic review on design thinking integrated learning in k-12 education. Appl. Sci. 12(16), 8077 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lin, L., Shadiev, R., Hwang, W.Y., Shen, S.: From knowledge and skills to digital works: an application of design thinking in the information technology course. Thinking Skills and Creativity 36, 100646 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Matthews, J., Wrigley, C.: Design and design thinking in business and management higher education. J. Learn. Des. 10(1), 41–54 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mentzer, N., Huffman, T., Thayer, H.: High school student modeling in the engineering design process. Int. J. Technol. Des. Educ. 24, 293–316 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Panke, S.: Design thinking in education: perspectives, opportunities and challenges. Open Educ. Stud. 1(1), 281–306 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Papert, S.A.: Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. Basic books (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Pitkänen, K., Iwata, M., Laru, J.: Exploring technology-oriented fab lab facilitators’ role as educators in k-12 education: focus on scaffolding novice students’ learning in digital fabrication activities. Int. J. Child-Comput. Interact. 26, 100207 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ross, L., et al.: Key practices for community engagement in research on mental health or substance abuse. Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Schlegel, R.J., Chu, S.L., Chen, K., Deuermeyer, E., Christy, A.G., Quek, F.: Making in the classroom: longitudinal evidence of increases in self-efficacy and stem possible selves over time. Comput. Educ. 142, 103637 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Simeon, M.I., Samsudin, M.A., Yakob, N.: Effect of design thinking approach on students’ achievement in some selected physics concepts in the context of stem learning. Int. J. Technol. Des. Educ. 32(1), 185–212 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09601-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Tsai, M.J., Wang, C.Y.: Assessing young students’ design thinking disposition and its relationship with computer programming self-efficacy. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 59(3), 410–428 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. UKRI: Co-production in research. https://www.ukri.org/about-us/policies-standards-and-data/good-research-resource-hub/research-co-production/

  35. Unertl, K.M., et al.: Integrating community-based participatory research and informatics approaches to improve the engagement and health of underserved populations. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 23(1), 60–73 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Vaughn, L.M., Jacquez, F.: Participatory research methods–choice points in the research process. J. Participatory Res. Meth. 1(1) (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Veldhuis, A., et al.: The connected qualities of design thinking and maker education practices in early education: a narrative review. In: Fablearn Europe/MAKEED 2021-an International Conference on Computing, Design and Making in Education, pp. 1–10 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Yiannoutsou, N., Nikitopoulou, S., Kynigos, C., Gueorguiev, I., Fernandez, J.A.: Activity plan template: a mediating tool for supporting learning design with robotics. In: Merdan, M., Lepuschitz, W., Koppensteiner, G., Balogh, R. (eds.) Robotics in Education. AISC, vol. 457, pp. 3–13. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42975-5_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The Extending Design Thinking with Emerging Digital Technologies EU project Grant agreement 101060231.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcelo Milrad .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Milrad, M. et al. (2023). Combining Design Thinking with Emerging Technologies in K-12 Education. In: Kubincová, Z., Caruso, F., Kim, Te., Ivanova, M., Lancia, L., Pellegrino, M.A. (eds) Methodologies and Intelligent Systems for Technology Enhanced Learning, Workshops - 13th International Conference. MIS4TEL 2023. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 769. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42134-1_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics