Abstract
Propelled by the COVID-19 pandemic and recent overturning of Roe vs. Wade in the United States [21], concerns have grown around the proliferation of reproductive health misinformation online. While a body of work in HCI has explored female health and wellbeing from a socio-technical perspective, a knowledge gap relating to women’s health misinformation and how it presents on social media remains. We report a mixed-methods content analysis of the ideological rhetoric, sources, and claims present in a sample of 202 officially fact-checked posts relating to female reproductive health. We found that reproductive health misinformation is diverse in its sources and represents a range of ideological standpoints, including pro-choice, feminist, and anti-authority rhetoric. We also found that claims are often tacit in nature, and rely on subtle manipulation and exaggerations to convey misleading narratives, as opposed to complete fabrications. In sum, we present a timely and nuanced analysis of the women’s health misinformation ecosystem. Our findings may inform priorities for HCI interventions that abate health misinformation, and more broadly, support women in navigating a complex and polarised information landscape.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Refers to the mainstream Republican political party in the United States, otherwise known as the GOP.
References
Almeida, T., Comber, R., Balaam, M.: HCI and intimate care as an agenda for change in women’s health. In: Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2599–2611. ACM, San Jose (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858187
Almenar, E., Aran-Ramspott, S., Suau, J., Masip, P.: Gender differences in tackling fake news: different degrees of concern, but same problems. Media Commun. 9(1), 229–238 (2021). https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v9i1.3523
Appling, S., Bruckman, A., De Choudhury, M.: Reactions to Fact Checking. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1145/3555128. CSCW, Association for Computing Machinery, New York
Ayers, J.W., Caputi, T.L., Nebeker, C., Dredze, M.: Don’t quote me: reverse identification of research participants in social media studies. NPJ Digit. Med. 1(1), 30 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-018-0036-2
Baker, S.A., Walsh, M.J.: ‘A mother’s intuition: it’s real and we have to believe in it’: how the maternal is used to promote vaccine refusal on Instagram. Inf. Commun. Soc., 1–18 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.2021269
Bardzell, S.: Feminist HCI: taking stock and outlining an agenda for design. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’10, pp. 1301–1310. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2010). https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753521
Bhattacharya, O., Siddiquea, B.N., Shetty, A., Afroz, A., Billah, B.: COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among pregnant women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 12(8), e061477 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061477
Bhuiyan, M.M., Horning, M., Lee, S.W., Mitra, T.: NudgeCred: supporting news credibility assessment on social media through nudges. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 5(CSCW2), 1–30 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3479571
Cohen, M.: Towards a framework for women’s health. Patient Educ. Couns. 33(3), 187–196 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0738-3991(98)00018-4
Dedrick, A., Merten, J.W., Adams, T., Wheeler, M., Kassie, T., King, J.L.: A content analysis of Pinterest belly fat loss exercises: unrealistic expectations and misinformation. Am. J. Health Educ. 51(5), 328–337 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/19325037.2020.1795754
Ecker, U.K.H., et al.: The psychological drivers of misinformation belief and its resistance to correction. Nat. Rev. Psychol. 1(1), 13–29 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-021-00006-y, https://www.nature.com/articles/s44159-021-00006-y
Flintham, M., Karner, C., Bachour, K., Creswick, H., Gupta, N., Moran, S.: Falling for fake news: investigating the consumption of news via social media. In: Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–10. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173950
Google: Google Fact Check Explorer - About (2023). https://toolbox.google.com/factcheck/about#fce
Han, L., Boniface, E.R., Han, L.Y., Albright, J., Doty, N., Darney, B.G.: The abortion web ecosystem: cross-sectional analysis of trustworthiness and bias. J. Med. Internet Res. 22(10), e20619 (2020). https://doi.org/10.2196/20619
HealthNews: period-blood face mask: why gynecologists disapprove? (2023). https://healthnews.com/beauty/skin-care/is-period-blood-good-for-skin-care/
Jolly, N.: Why are women buying GOOP? Women’s health and the wellness movement. Birth 47(3), 254–256 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1111/birt.12495
Lewandowsky, S., van der Linden, S.: Countering misinformation and fake news through inoculation and Prebunking. Eur. Rev. Soc. Psychol. 32, 348–384 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2021.1876983
McCammon, E., Bansal, S., Hebert, L.E., Yan, S., Menendez, A., Gilliam, M.: Exploring young women’s menstruation-related challenges in Uttar Pradesh, India, using the socio-ecological framework. Sex. Reprod. Health Matters 28(1), 1749342 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/26410397.2020.1749342
Meta: how Meta’s third-party fact-checking program works (2021). https://www.facebook.com/formedia/blog/third-party-fact-checking-how-it-works
OASH: A-Z Health Topics. https://www.womenshealth.gov/a-z-topics
Pagoto, S.L., Palmer, L., Horwitz-Willis, N.: The next Infodemic: abortion misinformation. J. Med. Internet Res. 25, e42582 (2023). https://doi.org/10.2196/42582, https://www.jmir.org/2023/1/e42582
Rougerie, P.: Abortifacient plants are dangerous, and ineffective as an abortion method (2022). https://healthfeedback.org/claimreview/abortifacient-plants-dangerous-and-ineffective-as-abortion-method/
Saltz, E., Leibowicz, C.R., Wardle, C.: Encounters with visual misinformation and labels across platforms: an interview and diary study to inform ecosystem approaches to misinformation interventions. In: Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–6. ACM, Yokohama (2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3411763.3451807
Shahi, G.K., Dirkson, A., Majchrzak, T.A.: An exploratory study of COVID-19 misinformation on Twitter. Online Soc. Netw. Media 22, 100104 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.osnem.2020.100104
Shahid, F., Kamath, S., Sidotam, A., Jiang, V., Batino, A., Vashistha, A.: "It Matches My Worldview": examining perceptions and attitudes around fake videos. In: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–15. ACM, New Orleans (2022). https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517646
Sharevski, F., Loop, J.V., Jachim, P., Devine, A., Pieroni, E.: Abortion misinformation on TikTok: rampant content, lax moderation, and vivid user experiences (2023). http://arxiv.org/abs/2301.05128
Simon, F., Howard, P.N., Nielsen, R.K.: Types, sources, and claims of COVID-19 misinformation. Technical report, Reuters Institute (2022)
Thomas, S.P.: Trust also means centering black women’s reproductive health narratives. Hastings Cent. Rep. 52(S1), S18–S21 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.1362
Tuli, A., Chopra, S., Kumar, N., Singh, P.: Learning from and with Menstrupedia: towards menstrual health education in India. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2(CSCW), 1–20 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3274443
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Malki, L.M., Patel, D., Singh, A. (2023). A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Women’s Health Misinformation on Social Media. In: Abdelnour Nocera, J., Kristín Lárusdóttir, M., Petrie, H., Piccinno, A., Winckler, M. (eds) Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2023. INTERACT 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14144. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42286-7_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42286-7_22
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-42285-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-42286-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)