Abstract
Failure of systems occur in all domains of human activity. Apart from identifying who will be deemed accountable, a thorough analysis of a failure also provides understanding of the causes. This is the first step towards learning and future improvement. It has become evident that process improvement improves the resulting products and services. Prevention is always desirable, but more often than not, the predictability of future behavior of systems is difficult. Hence, most of the learning takes place in the analysis of failures. This paper focuses on a STEEPLED analysis of system failures, with particular emphasis on failed systems from the fields of Architecture, Engineering, and Healthcare systems. This transdisciplinary and multi-dimensional view of systems provides a holistic thinking instrument for structuring the analysis of failures and for enabling action in order to avoid or at least minimize future failures.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bedingfield, K.L., Leach, R.D.: Spacecraft System Failures and Anomalies Attributed to the Natural Space Environment, vol. 1390. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Marshall Space Flight Center (1996). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1995-3564
Berki E., Georgiadou E., Sadler C., Siakas K.: A methodology is as strong as the user participation. In: International Symposium on Software Engineering in Universities – ISSEU 1997, Rovaniemi, pp.36–51 (1997)
P Beynon-Davies 1995 Information systems ‘failure’: the case of the London Ambulance Service’s Computer Aided Dispatch project Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 4 3 171 184 https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.1995.20
Blockley, D. Bridges: The Science and Art of the World’s Most Inspiring STRUCTURES. Oxford University Press (2003). ISBN 978-0-19-964572-5
V Braun V Clarke 2006 Using thematic analysis in psychology Qual. Res. Psychol. 3 77 101
Chapman, J.: System failure: why governments must learn to think differently. Demos (2004)
Y-C Chen T Arnold H-T Tsai 2021 Customer involvement, business capabilities and new product performance Eur. J. Mark. 55 10 2769 2793 https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-01-2020-0034
David, E.: Vibration of the London millennium bridge: cause and cure. Newland Int. J. Acoust. Vibr. 8(1) (2003)
Dalcher, D.: Disaster in London. The LAS case study. In: Engineering of Computer-Based Systems, Proceedings. ECBS 1999. IEEE Conference and Workshop (1999). https://doi.org/10.1109/ECBS.1999.755860
Dalcher, D., Drevin, L.: Learning from information systems failures by using narrative and ante-narrative methods. South Afr. Comput. J. 88–97 (2004)
YK Dwivedi 2014 Research on information systems failures and successes: status update and future directions Inf. Syst. Front. 17 1 143 157 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-014-9500-y
R Garg S Chandra A Kumar 2022 Analysis of bridge failures in India from 1977 to 2017 Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 18 3 295 312 https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2020.1832539
Georgiadou, E., Siakas, K., Berki, E., Estdale, J., Rahanu, H., Ross, M.: A STEEPLED pilot validation of the Sociocultural Dimension of the SPI Manifesto. J. Softw. Evol. Process 1–15 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1002/smr.2304
Georgiadou, E., Siakas, K., Berki, E., Estdale, J., Rahanu, H., Ross, M.: A STEEPLED analysis of the SPI manifesto. In: Walker, A., O’Connor, R.V., Messnarz, R. (eds.) Systems, Software and Services Process Improvement, Communications in Computer and Information Science (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28005-5
D Harland R Lorenz 2007 Space Systems Failures: Disasters and Rescues of Satellites, Rocket and Space Probes Springer Science & Business Media
R Heeks 2006 Health information systems: failure, success and improvisation Int. J. Med. Inform. 75 2 125 137 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.07.024
CM Holloway 1996 The Challenger Launch Decision: Risky Technology, Culture, and Deviance at NASA University of Chicago Press Chicago
Kaur, R., Sengupta, J.: Software process models and analysis on failure of software development projects. arXiv preprint arXiv:1306.1068 (2013). https://doi.org/10.22541/au.149693987.70506124
J Kolodner 1992 An introduction to case-based reasoning Artif. Intell. Rev. 6 3 34
G Lampropoulos 2022 Artificial intelligence, big data, and machine learning in industry 4.0 J Wang Eds Encyclopedia of Data Science and Machine Learning IGI Global 2101 2109 https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-9220-5.ch125
K Lyytinen 1998 Expectation failure concept and systems analysts’ view of information system failures: results of an exploratory study Inf. Manage. 14 1 45 56 https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-7206(88)90066-3
K Lyytinen D Robey 1999 Learning failure in information systems development Inf. Syst. J. 9 2 85 101 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2575.1999.00051
Maguire, M., Delahunt, B.: Doing a thematic analysis: a practical, step-by-step guide for learning and teaching scholars. All Ireland J. High. Educ. 9(3) (2017)
J McManus T Wood-Harper 2007 Understanding the sources of information systems project failure Manag. Serv. 51 3 38 43
Nelson, R.R.: IT project management: infamous failures, classic mistakes, and best practices. MIS Q. Exec. 6(2) (2007). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118835531.ch2
DW Olson SF Wolf JM Hook 2015 The Tacoma narrows bridge collapse Phys. Today 68 11 64 65
MK Parfitt 2012 Why buildings fail: are we learning from our mistakes? Buildings 2 4 326 331 https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings2030326
G Pan R Hackney S Pan 2008 Information systems implementation failure: insights from prism Int. J. Inf. Manage. 28 4 259 269 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2007.07.001
H Rahanu J Davies S Rogerson 1999 Failed IS projects: definition in terms of a neglect of professional ethics Fail. Lessons Learn. Inf. Technol. Manage. 3 1 1 22
Siakas, K., Georgiadou, E.: PERFUMES: a scent of product quality characteristics. In: The 13th International Software Quality Management Conference, SQM (2005)
J Camp Van J Braet 2016 Taxonomizing performance measurement systems’ failures Int. J. Product. Perform. Manag. 65 5 672 693 https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-03-2015-0054
RK Woolthuis M Lankhuizen V Gilsing 2005 A system failure framework for innovation policy design Technovation 25 6 609 619 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2003.11.002
D Winkler R O’Connor R Messnarz 2011 Systems, Software and Services Process Improvement Springer Berlin 97 108
K Yeo 2002 Critical failure factors in information system projects Int. J. Project Manage. 20 3 241 246 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(01)00075-8
G Zhang Y Liu J Liu S Lan J Yang 2022 Causes and statistical characteristics of bridge failures: a review J. Traffic Transport. Eng. Engl. Ed. 9 3 388 406 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtte.2021.12.003
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Siakas, D., Lampropoulos, G., Rahanu, H., Siakas, K., Georgiadou, E., Ross, M. (2023). Improvement of Process and Outcomes Through a STEEPLED Analysis of System Failures. In: Yilmaz, M., Clarke, P., Riel, A., Messnarz, R. (eds) Systems, Software and Services Process Improvement. EuroSPI 2023. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1891. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42310-9_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42310-9_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-42309-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-42310-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)