Skip to main content

Impact of Theory of Inventive Problem Solving (TRIZ) on Innovation Portfolio Development

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Towards AI-Aided Invention and Innovation (TFC 2023)

Abstract

Innovation portfolio management (IPM) is a critical planning phase for organisations to visualise all possible growth opportunities and strategically allocate resources. However, to maximise the probability of business growth, it is necessary to follow a robust structured portfolio process. This paper analyses research and highlights several success dimensions of innovation product portfolios by a systematic literature review and outlines nine success criteria. Additionally, it examines all the portfolio methods that significantly influence the portfolio’s “innovation” aspect. Secondly, we evaluate and discuss the impact of TRIZ tools and approaches on innovation portfolios and explore their relationships with business growth. Thirdly, the research presents modern TRIZ approaches, and the types of TRIZ-based innovation projects organisations can execute to build robust, innovative product portfolios. Finally, the article summarises critical information on the different types of innovation projects and TRIZ tools utilised for these projects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Abramov, O.: TRIZ-Based Cause And Effect Chains Analysis Vs Root Cause Analysis. In: TRIZfest 2015 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Abramov, O., Fimin, P., Smirnova, E.: Technology Scouting in Chemistry: Roadmap and Case Studies (2019). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/336239372

  3. Abramov, O., Markosov, S., Medvedev, A.: Experimental validation of quantum-economic analysis (QEA) as a screening tool for new product development. In: Koziołek, S., Chechurin, L., Collan, M. (eds.) Advances and Impacts of the Theory of Inventive Problem Solving. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96532-1_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Abramov, O., Medvedev, A., Tomashevskaya, N.: Main parameters of value (MPV) analysis: where MPV candidates come from. In: Borgianni, Y., Brad, S., Cavallucci, D., Livotov, P. (eds.) TFC 2021. IAICT, vol. 635, pp. 391–400. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86614-3_31

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Abramov, O.: Voice of the product to supplement voice of the customer. In: TRIZfest (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Abramov, O.: Product-oriented MPV analysis to identify voice of the product. In: TRIZ fest 2016 26–28 July, Beijing, People’s Republic of China(2016)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Abramov, O.: Generating new product ideas with TRIZ-derived voice of the product and quantum -economic analysis (QEA). In: 17th International TRIZ Future Conference, pp. 80–87 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Abramov, O.: Innovation funnel of modern TRIZ: experimental study to show the efficacy of the TRIZ-assisted stage-gate process. In: TRIZfest 2018, pp. 105–110 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Abramov, O., Medvedev, A.V., Tomashevskaya, N.: TRIZ fest 2019 entering adjacent markets is a widely accepted marketing strategy for developing business without, pp. 0–9 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Aramand, M.: Software products and services are high tech? New product development strategy for software products and services. Technovation 28(3), 154–160 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2007.10.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Archer, N.P., Ghasemzadeh, F.: An integrated framework for project portfolio selection. Int. J. Proj. Manage. 17(4), 207–216 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(98)00032-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bai, L.B., et al.: Analysis of factors influencing project portfolio benefits with synergy considerations. Eng. Constr. Architect. Manage. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-11-2021-0986

  13. Brentani, U.: Innovative versus incremental new business services: different keys for achieving success. J. Prod. Innov. Manage. 18(3), 169–187 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0737-6782(01)00071-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cooper, R., Edgett, S., Kleinschmidt, E.: ‘Portfolio management for new product development: results of an industry practices study. R & D Manage. 31(4), 361–380 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9310.00225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cooper, R., Kleinschmidt, E., Edgett, S.:J of Product Innov Manag - 2004 - Cooper - New Product Portfolio Management Practices and Performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cooper, R.G.: The drivers of success in new-product development. Industr. Mark. Manage. 76, 36–47 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.07.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cooper, R.G., Edgett, S.J., Kleinschmidt, E.J.: New problems, new solutions: making portfolio management more effective. Res. Technol. Manage. 43(2), 18–33 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2000.11671338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cooper, R.G., Kleinschmidt, E.J.: Success factors in product innovation. Industr. Mark. Manage. 16(3), 215–223 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1016/0019-8501(87)90029-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dewar, R.D., Dutton, J.E.: The adoption of radical and incremental innovations: an empirical analysis. Manage. Sci. 32(11), 1422–1433 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.11.1422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Flechas, C., et al.: The evolution of project portfolio selection methods: from incremental to radical innovation. Revista Gestao 26(3), 212–236 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1108/REGE-10-2018-0096/FULL/PDF

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gershman, M., Litvin, S.: Parallel evolutionary lines (PEL). In: Proceedings (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ghane, M., et al.: TRIZ trend of engineering system evolution: a review on applications, benefits, challenges and enhancement with computer-aided aspects. Comput. Ind. Eng. 174, 108833 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CIE.2022.108833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hadjinicolaou, N., Kader, M., Abdallah, I.: Strategic innovation, foresight and the deployment of project portfolio management under mid-range planning conditions in medium-sized firms. Sustainability 14, 80 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Henderson, B.: The Product Portfolio. Consulting group, Boston (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Huan, X., Deng-ke, Y.: Which characteristic portfolios lead to innovation?; which characteristic portfolios lead to innovation?. In: 2017 International Conference on Management Science and Engineering (ICMSE) (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ikovenko, S.: TRIZ application for IP strategies development. TRIZ Summit (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ilevbare, I.M., Probert, D., Phaal, R.: A review of TRIZ, and its benefits and challenges in practice. Technovation 33, 30–37 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2012.11.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Jetter, A.J.M.: Educating the guess: strategies, concepts and tools for the fuzzy front end of product development. In: Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology, pp. 261–273 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1109/picmet.2003.1222803

  29. Kaliteevskii, V., Bryksin, M., Chechurin, L.: TRIZ application for digital product design and management. In: Borgianni, Y., et al. (eds.) Creative Solutions for a Sustainable Development, pp. 245–255. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86614-3_20

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. Karlos, A.: Management of project-oriented organization - Conceptual analysis. Project Management Association Finland, pp. 5–22 (2001). https://research.aalto.fi/en/publications/management-of-project-oriented-organization-conceptual-analysis. Accessed 23 Apr 2023

  31. Karlos, A., Martinsuo, M., Aalto, T.: Project Portfolio Management Strategic Management through Projects (2001). https://research.aalto.fi/en/publications/management-of-project-oriented-organization-conceptual-analysis. Accessed 23 Apr 2023

  32. Khurana, A., Rosenthal, S.R.: Integrating the fuzzy front end of new product development. IEEE Eng. Manage. Rev. 25(4), 35–49 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Likar, B., et al.: Open innovation in the fuzzy front end. Open Innov., 1–2 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118947166.part1

  34. Livotov, P., Ruchti, B.: TRIZ-based Innovation Principles and a Process for Problem Solving in Business and Management Educating the Edisons of the 21st Century View project Advanced Innovation Design Approach-AIDA View project (2001). www.diwings.ch. Accessed 4 Apr 2021

  35. Lyubomirskiy, A., et al.: Trends of Engineering Systems Evolution (TESE) TRIZ paths to innovation (2014). http://library1.nida.ac.th/termpaper6/sd/2554/19755.pdf

  36. Martinsuo, M., Lehtonen, P.: Role of single-project management in achieving portfolio management efficiency. Int. J. Proj. Manage. 25(1), 56–65 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.04.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Mathews, S.: Innovation portfolio architecture. In: Research Technology Management, pp. 30–40. Industrial Research Institute Inc., (2010). https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2010.11657660

  38. Moehrle, M.G., Isenmann, R., Phaal, R.: Technology Roadmapping for Strategy and Innovation (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33923-3

  39. Oliveira, M.G., Rozenfeld, H.: Integrating technology roadmapping and portfolio management at the front-end of new product development. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 77(8), 1339–1354 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2010.07.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Petit, Y.: Project portfolios in dynamic environments: organizing for uncertainty. Int. J. Proj. Manage. 30(5), 539–553 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.11.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Phaal, R., Farrukh, C., Probert, D.R.: Technology management and roadmapping at the firm level. In: Technology Roadmapping for Strategy and Innovation: Charting the Route to Success, pp. 13–29 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33923-3_2/COVER

  42. Phaal, R., Simonse, L., den Ouden, E.: Next generation roadmapping for innovation planning. Int. J. Technol. Intell. Plann. 4(2), 135–152 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTIP.2008.018313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Phadnis, N., Torkkeli, M.: Model for selecting open innovation strategies: the S-Curve effect. In: Event Proceedings: LUT Scientific and Expertise Publications (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Phadnis, N.S.: Innovation portfolio management: how can TRIZ help? In: Nowak, R., Chrząszcz, J., Brad, S. (eds.) Systematic Innovation Partnerships with Artificial Intelligence and Information Technology, TFC 2022, vol. 655, pp. 352–366. Springer, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17288-5_30

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  45. Reinertsen, D.G.: Taking the fuzziness out of the fuzzy front end. IEEE Eng. Manage. Rev. 28(1), 51–57 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Shenhar, A.J., et al.: Project success: a multidimensional strategic concept. Long Range Plann. 34, 699–725 (2001). www.lrpjournal.com. Accessed 23 Apr 2023

  47. Sloan, S.R.: Integrating the Fuzzy Front End of New Product Development, Management Review, Winter (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Souchkov, V.: Breakthrough thinking with TRIZ for business and management: an overview (2007). www.xtriz.com. Accessed 4 Apr 2021

  49. Souchkov, V.: Value-Conflict MappingTM (VCM) To Define and Structure Innovation Strategy (2008). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332935295

  50. Souchkov, V.: Accelerate Innovation with TRIZ, Technology, p. 15 (2013). www.xtriz.com. Accessed 4 Apr 2021

  51. Souchkov, V.: Multi-Screen Analysis for Innovation Roadmapping (2014). www.xtriz.com. Accessed 4 Apr 2021

  52. Souchkov, V.: Typical Patterns of Business Model Innovation (2015). www.xtriz.com. Accessed 4 Apr 2021

  53. Souchkov, V.: TRIZ and Systematic Business Model Innovation (2017). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267408983

  54. Souchkov, V.: TRIZ for Business systems (2017) www.xtriz.com. Accessed 4 Apr 2021

  55. Souchkov, V.: Business services innovation: transition to supersystem. In: Section: TRIZ for Business and Management (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  56. Souchkov, V.: TRIZ for Business and Management: State of the Art (keynote paper). Minsk, Belarus Plenary Section (2019). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/334442566

  57. Souchkov, V., Mayer, O.: TRIZ for Business, pp. 399–411 (2019). www.matriz.org. Accessed 3 May 2023

  58. Souchkov, V.V., Patrick, J., Roxas, B.: A system of standard inventive solution patterns for business and management problems (2016). www.xtriz.com. Accessed 4 Apr 2021

  59. Teplov, R.: What is known about TRIZ in Innovation Management?. In: ISPIM Conference (2014). http://search.proquest.com/openview/7dcfbd982d2ea05341092a69ae6fe2ae/1?pq-origsite=gscholar

  60. Treacy, M., Sims, J.: Take Command of Your Growth (2004). www.hbr.org. Accessed 28 Apr 2023

  61. Ulwick, A.: Jobs to be done: Theory To Practise (2016). http://library1.nida.ac.th/termpaper6/sd/2554/19755.pdf

  62. Villamil, C., Schulte, J., Hallstedt, S.: ‘Sustainability risk and portfolio management—A strategic scenario method for sustainable product development. Bus. Strat. Environ. 31(3), 1042–1057 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Visnepolschi, S.: How to Overcome Persistent Failures (2004). https://www.amazon.com/Overcome-Persistent-Failures-Svetlana-Visnepolschi-ebook/dp/B00AZJIVY8. Accessed 4 May 2023

  64. Wang, J., et al.: Development of technology opportunity analysis based on technology landscape by extending technology elements with BERT and TRIZ. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 191, 122481 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Abramov, O.Y.: TRIZ-assisted stage-gate process for developing new products. J. Fin. Econ. 2(5), 178–184 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Mr Shree M Phadnis, TRIZAsia and GENTRIZ LLC for providing valuable inputs to the research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nikhil Phadnis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Phadnis, N., Torkkeli, M. (2023). Impact of Theory of Inventive Problem Solving (TRIZ) on Innovation Portfolio Development. In: Cavallucci, D., Livotov, P., Brad, S. (eds) Towards AI-Aided Invention and Innovation. TFC 2023. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 682. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42532-5_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42532-5_27

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-42531-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-42532-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics