Skip to main content

Moving Beyond Stance Detection in Cross-Cutting Communication Analysis

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Social, Cultural, and Behavioral Modeling (SBP-BRiMS 2023)

Abstract

In today’s social media landscape, personal opinions on controversial topics are widespread. While some platforms provide structured environments for discussing such matters, fostering cross-cutting communication among individuals, understanding how people engage in these discussions remains a challenge. This study aims to understand the dynamics of discussing controversial topics, focusing specifically on the topic of abortion. Using an aspect-based approach, we employ BERT-based topic modeling and attention mechanisms to identify key aspects of debates. Through clustering, we identify highly polarizing aspects and examine the contextual nuances and sentiment surrounding them. Our methodology enhances our understanding of cross-cutting communication on controversial topics and offers an in-depth analysis of consensus and disagreement among participants. Our study contributes to the field of stance analysis, revealing opportunities for mutual understanding and uncovering diverse perspectives on controversial issues. (Warning: this paper contains content that may be triggering.)

D. D. Ramos and S. Jeoung—Equal contribution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Addawood, A., Rezapour, R., Abdar, O., Diesner, J.: Telling apart tweets associated with controversial versus non-controversial topics. In: Proceedings of the Second Workshop on NLP and Computational Social Science, Vancouver, Canada, August 2017, pp. 32–41. Association for Computational Linguistics (2017). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W17-2905. https://aclanthology.org/W17-2905

  2. Angelov, D.: Top2Vec: distributed representations of topics. CoRR abs/2008.09470 (2020). https://arxiv.org/abs/2008.09470

  3. Barbieri, F., Espinosa Anke, L., Camacho-Collados, J.: XLM-T: a multilingual language model toolkit for Twitter. arXiv e-prints arXiv:2104.12250 (2021)

  4. Baumer, E., Elovic, E., Qin, Y., Polletta, F., Gay, G.: Testing and comparing computational approaches for identifying the language of framing in political news. In: Proceedings of the 2015 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 1472–1482 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Boyd, R.L., Ashokkumar, A., Seraj, S., Pennebaker, J.W.: The development and psychometric properties of LIWC-22, pp. 1–47. University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Card, D., Gross, J.H., Boydstun, A., Smith, N.A.: Analyzing framing through the casts of characters in the news. In: Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 1410–1420 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dahlberg, S., Sahlgren, M.: Issue framing and language use in the Swedish blogosphere. In: From Text to Political Positions: Text Analysis Across Disciplines, pp. 71–92 . John Benjamins, Amsterdam (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Devlin, J., Chang, M.W., Lee, K., Toutanova, K.: BERT: pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. In: Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers), Minneapolis, Minnesota, June 2019, pp. 4171–4186. Association for Computational Linguistics (2019). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/N19-1423. https://aclanthology.org/N19-1423

  9. Durmus, E., Cardie, C.: A corpus for modeling user and language effects in argumentation on online debating. In: Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 602–607 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Entman, R.M.: Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. J. Commun. 43(4), 51–58 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Entman, R.M.: Framing bias: media in the distribution of power. J. Commun. 57(1), 163–173 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gonen, H., Jawahar, G., Seddah, D., Goldberg, Y.: Simple, interpretable and stable method for detecting words with usage change across corpora. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.14330 (2021)

  13. Gupta, V., Lehal, G.S.: A survey of text summarization extractive techniques. J. Emerg. Technol. Web Intell. 2(3), 258–268 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jones, D.A.: The polarizing effect of new media messages. Int. J. Pub. Opin. Res. 14(2), 158–174 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. KhudaBukhsh, A.R., Sarkar, R., Kamlet, M.S., Mitchell, T.: We don’t speak the same language: interpreting polarization through machine translation. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 35, pp. 14893–14901 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Matthes, J., Knoll, J., Valenzuela, S., Hopmann, D.N., Von Sikorski, C.: A meta-analysis of the effects of cross-cutting exposure on political participation. Polit. Commun. 36(4), 523–542 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mohammad, S., Kiritchenko, S., Sobhani, P., Zhu, X., Cherry, C.: SemEval-2016 Task 6: detecting stance in tweets. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation, SemEval-2016, pp. 31–41 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Monroe, B.L., Colaresi, M.P., Quinn, K.M.: Fightin’ words: lexical feature selection and evaluation for identifying the content of political conflict. Polit. Anal. 16(4), 372–403 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Murakami, A., Raymond, R.: Support or oppose?: classifying positions in online debates from reply activities and opinion expressions. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Posters, pp. 869–875. Association for Computational Linguistics (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Newman, N.: Mainstream media and the distribution of news in the age of social media (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Prior, M.: Media and political polarization. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 16, 101–127 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Rezapour, R., Dinh, L., Diesner, J.: Incorporating the measurement of moral foundations theory into analyzing stances on controversial topics. In: Proceedings of the 32nd ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media, pp. 177–188 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rezapour, R., Shah, S.H., Diesner, J.: Enhancing the measurement of social effects by capturing morality. In: Proceedings of the 10th Workshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity, Sentiment and Social Media Analysis, pp. 35–45 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Roccas, S., Brewer, M.B.: Social identity complexity. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 6(2), 88–106 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Siddiqua, U.A., Chy, A.N., Aono, M.: Tweet stance detection using an attention based neural ensemble model. In: Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers), pp. 1868–1873 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Skeppstedt, M., Stede, M., Kerren, A.: Stance-taking in topics extracted from vaccine-related tweets and discussion forum posts. In: Proceedings of the 2018 EMNLP Workshop SMM4H: The 3rd Social Media Mining for Health Applications Workshop & Shared Task, pp. 5–8 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Somasundaran, S., Wiebe, J.: Recognizing stances in online debates. In: Proceedings of the Joint Conference of the 47th Annual Meeting of the ACL and the 4th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing of the AFNLP, Suntec, Singapore, August 2009, pp. 226–234 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang, B., Yang, M., Li, X., Ye, Y., Xu, X., Dai, K.: Enhancing cross-target stance detection with transferable semantic-emotion knowledge. In: Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 3188–3197 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Gil de Zúñiga, H., Jung, N., Valenzuela, S.: Social media use for news and individuals’ social capital, civic engagement and political participation. J. Comput. Mediat. Commun. 17(3), 319–336 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work was supported in part by the Cline Center for Advanced Social Research at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, including a Linowes Fellowship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rezvaneh Rezapour .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Rezapour, R., Delgado Ramos, D., Jeoung, S., Diesner, J. (2023). Moving Beyond Stance Detection in Cross-Cutting Communication Analysis. In: Thomson, R., Al-khateeb, S., Burger, A., Park, P., A. Pyke, A. (eds) Social, Cultural, and Behavioral Modeling. SBP-BRiMS 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14161. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43129-6_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43129-6_30

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-43128-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-43129-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics