Abstract
In today’s social media landscape, personal opinions on controversial topics are widespread. While some platforms provide structured environments for discussing such matters, fostering cross-cutting communication among individuals, understanding how people engage in these discussions remains a challenge. This study aims to understand the dynamics of discussing controversial topics, focusing specifically on the topic of abortion. Using an aspect-based approach, we employ BERT-based topic modeling and attention mechanisms to identify key aspects of debates. Through clustering, we identify highly polarizing aspects and examine the contextual nuances and sentiment surrounding them. Our methodology enhances our understanding of cross-cutting communication on controversial topics and offers an in-depth analysis of consensus and disagreement among participants. Our study contributes to the field of stance analysis, revealing opportunities for mutual understanding and uncovering diverse perspectives on controversial issues. (Warning: this paper contains content that may be triggering.)
D. D. Ramos and S. Jeoung—Equal contribution.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Addawood, A., Rezapour, R., Abdar, O., Diesner, J.: Telling apart tweets associated with controversial versus non-controversial topics. In: Proceedings of the Second Workshop on NLP and Computational Social Science, Vancouver, Canada, August 2017, pp. 32–41. Association for Computational Linguistics (2017). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W17-2905. https://aclanthology.org/W17-2905
Angelov, D.: Top2Vec: distributed representations of topics. CoRR abs/2008.09470 (2020). https://arxiv.org/abs/2008.09470
Barbieri, F., Espinosa Anke, L., Camacho-Collados, J.: XLM-T: a multilingual language model toolkit for Twitter. arXiv e-prints arXiv:2104.12250 (2021)
Baumer, E., Elovic, E., Qin, Y., Polletta, F., Gay, G.: Testing and comparing computational approaches for identifying the language of framing in political news. In: Proceedings of the 2015 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 1472–1482 (2015)
Boyd, R.L., Ashokkumar, A., Seraj, S., Pennebaker, J.W.: The development and psychometric properties of LIWC-22, pp. 1–47. University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX (2022)
Card, D., Gross, J.H., Boydstun, A., Smith, N.A.: Analyzing framing through the casts of characters in the news. In: Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 1410–1420 (2016)
Dahlberg, S., Sahlgren, M.: Issue framing and language use in the Swedish blogosphere. In: From Text to Political Positions: Text Analysis Across Disciplines, pp. 71–92 . John Benjamins, Amsterdam (2014)
Devlin, J., Chang, M.W., Lee, K., Toutanova, K.: BERT: pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. In: Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers), Minneapolis, Minnesota, June 2019, pp. 4171–4186. Association for Computational Linguistics (2019). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/N19-1423. https://aclanthology.org/N19-1423
Durmus, E., Cardie, C.: A corpus for modeling user and language effects in argumentation on online debating. In: Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 602–607 (2019)
Entman, R.M.: Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. J. Commun. 43(4), 51–58 (1993)
Entman, R.M.: Framing bias: media in the distribution of power. J. Commun. 57(1), 163–173 (2007)
Gonen, H., Jawahar, G., Seddah, D., Goldberg, Y.: Simple, interpretable and stable method for detecting words with usage change across corpora. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.14330 (2021)
Gupta, V., Lehal, G.S.: A survey of text summarization extractive techniques. J. Emerg. Technol. Web Intell. 2(3), 258–268 (2010)
Jones, D.A.: The polarizing effect of new media messages. Int. J. Pub. Opin. Res. 14(2), 158–174 (2002)
KhudaBukhsh, A.R., Sarkar, R., Kamlet, M.S., Mitchell, T.: We don’t speak the same language: interpreting polarization through machine translation. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 35, pp. 14893–14901 (2021)
Matthes, J., Knoll, J., Valenzuela, S., Hopmann, D.N., Von Sikorski, C.: A meta-analysis of the effects of cross-cutting exposure on political participation. Polit. Commun. 36(4), 523–542 (2019)
Mohammad, S., Kiritchenko, S., Sobhani, P., Zhu, X., Cherry, C.: SemEval-2016 Task 6: detecting stance in tweets. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation, SemEval-2016, pp. 31–41 (2016)
Monroe, B.L., Colaresi, M.P., Quinn, K.M.: Fightin’ words: lexical feature selection and evaluation for identifying the content of political conflict. Polit. Anal. 16(4), 372–403 (2008)
Murakami, A., Raymond, R.: Support or oppose?: classifying positions in online debates from reply activities and opinion expressions. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Posters, pp. 869–875. Association for Computational Linguistics (2010)
Newman, N.: Mainstream media and the distribution of news in the age of social media (2011)
Prior, M.: Media and political polarization. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 16, 101–127 (2013)
Rezapour, R., Dinh, L., Diesner, J.: Incorporating the measurement of moral foundations theory into analyzing stances on controversial topics. In: Proceedings of the 32nd ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media, pp. 177–188 (2021)
Rezapour, R., Shah, S.H., Diesner, J.: Enhancing the measurement of social effects by capturing morality. In: Proceedings of the 10th Workshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity, Sentiment and Social Media Analysis, pp. 35–45 (2019)
Roccas, S., Brewer, M.B.: Social identity complexity. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 6(2), 88–106 (2002)
Siddiqua, U.A., Chy, A.N., Aono, M.: Tweet stance detection using an attention based neural ensemble model. In: Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers), pp. 1868–1873 (2019)
Skeppstedt, M., Stede, M., Kerren, A.: Stance-taking in topics extracted from vaccine-related tweets and discussion forum posts. In: Proceedings of the 2018 EMNLP Workshop SMM4H: The 3rd Social Media Mining for Health Applications Workshop & Shared Task, pp. 5–8 (2018)
Somasundaran, S., Wiebe, J.: Recognizing stances in online debates. In: Proceedings of the Joint Conference of the 47th Annual Meeting of the ACL and the 4th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing of the AFNLP, Suntec, Singapore, August 2009, pp. 226–234 (2009)
Zhang, B., Yang, M., Li, X., Ye, Y., Xu, X., Dai, K.: Enhancing cross-target stance detection with transferable semantic-emotion knowledge. In: Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 3188–3197 (2020)
Gil de Zúñiga, H., Jung, N., Valenzuela, S.: Social media use for news and individuals’ social capital, civic engagement and political participation. J. Comput. Mediat. Commun. 17(3), 319–336 (2012)
Acknowledgment
This work was supported in part by the Cline Center for Advanced Social Research at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, including a Linowes Fellowship.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Rezapour, R., Delgado Ramos, D., Jeoung, S., Diesner, J. (2023). Moving Beyond Stance Detection in Cross-Cutting Communication Analysis. In: Thomson, R., Al-khateeb, S., Burger, A., Park, P., A. Pyke, A. (eds) Social, Cultural, and Behavioral Modeling. SBP-BRiMS 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14161. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43129-6_30
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43129-6_30
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-43128-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-43129-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)