Skip to main content

Arbitrary Profit Sharing in Federated Learning Utility Games

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Algorithmic Game Theory (SAGT 2023)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 14238))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 292 Accesses

Abstract

Arbitrary cost-sharing is a model in which the players of a resource selection game get to declare the payments that they will make, rather than have the payments be determined by a cost-sharing protocol. Arbitrary cost-sharing has been studied in various contexts, such as congestion games, network design games, and scheduling games. The natural counterpart of arbitrary cost-sharing in the context of a utility game is arbitrary utility-sharing, meaning that each player will request a certain utility as a reward for her efforts in generating welfare for the system. This concept has received much less attention in the literature. In this paper, we initiate the study of arbitrary sharing in utility games, placing emphasis on the special case of federated learning utility games, in which players form groups that jointly execute a learning task and each player contributes certain types of data to each group. We present results on the price of anarchy and price of stability, showing that the price of anarchy is 2 and that arbitrary utility sharing is the only known method to achieve price of stability 1 with budget-balanced payments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Anshelevich, E., Caskurlu, B.: Exact and approximate equilibria for optimal group network formation. Theor. Comput. Sci. 412(39), 5298–5314 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Anshelevich, E., Caskurlu, B.: Price of stability in survivable network design. Theory Comput. Syst. 49(1), 98–138 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Anshelevich, E., Dasgupta, A., Tardos, É., Wexler, T.: Near-optimal network design with selfish agents. Theory Comput. 4(1), 77–109 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Anshelevich, E., Karagiozova, A.: Terminal backup, 3d matching, and covering cubic graphs. SIAM J. Comput. 40(3), 678–708 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Bachrach, Y., Syrgkanis, V., Vojnovic, M.: Incentives and efficiency in uncertain collaborative environments. In: WINE, pp. 26–39 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Calinescu, G., Chekuri, C., Pal, M., Vondrak, J.: Maximizing a submodular set function subject to a matroid constraint (extended abstract). In: IPCO, pp. 182–196 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cardinal, J., Hoefer, M.: Non-cooperative facility location and covering games. Theor. Comput. Sci. 411(16–18), 1855–1876 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Donahue, K., Kleinberg, J.M.: Model-sharing games: analyzing federated learning under voluntary participation. In: Thirty-Fifth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2021, pp. 5303–5311. AAAI Press (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Donahue, K., Kleinberg, J.M.: Optimality and stability in federated learning: a game-theoretic approach. In: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2021, NeurIPS 2021, 6–14 December 2021, virtual, pp. 1287–1298 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Epstein, A., Feldman, M., Mansour, Y.: Strong equilibrium in cost sharing connection games. Games Econ. Behav. 67(1), 51–68 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Filmus, Y., Ward, J.: The power of local search: maximum coverage over a matroid. In: STACS, pp. 601–612 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Filmus, Y., Ward, J.: Monotone submodular maximization over a matroid via non-oblivious local search. SIAM J. Comput. 43(2), 514–542 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Georgoulaki, E., Kollias, K., Tamir, T.: Equilibrium inefficiency in resource buying games with load-dependent costs. In: Algorithmic Game Theory - 13th International Symposium, SAGT 2020, Augsburg, Germany, 16–18 2020 September, Proceedings (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Georgoulaki, E., Kollias, K.: On the price of anarchy of cost-sharing in real-time scheduling systems. In: Web and Internet Economics - 15th International Conference, WINE 2019, New York, NY, USA, 10–12 December 2019, Proceedings (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Georgoulaki, E., Kollias, K., Tamir, T.: Equilibrium inefficiency and computation in cost-sharing games in real-time scheduling systems. Algorithms 14(4), 103 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gollapudi, S., Kollias, K., Panigrahi, D., Pliatsika, V.: Profit sharing and efficiency in utility games. In: ESA (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Harks, T., Miller, K.: The worst-case efficiency of cost sharing methods in resource allocation games. Oper. Res. 59(6), 1491–1503 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Harks, T., Peis, B.: Resource buying games. Algorithmica 70(3), 493–512 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Hoefer, M.: Non-cooperative tree creation. Algorithmica 53(1), 104–131 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Hoefer, M.: Competitive cost sharing with economies of scale. Algorithmica 60(4), 743–765 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Hoefer, M.: Strategic cooperation in cost sharing games. Int. J. Game Theory 42(1), 29–53 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Marden, J.R., Roughgarden, T.: Generalized efficiency bounds in distributed resource allocation. In: CDC, pp. 2233–2238. IEEE (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Marden, J.R., Wierman, A.: Distributed welfare games. Oper. Res. 61(1), 155–168 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Tamir, T.: Cost-sharing games in real-time scheduling systems. In: Web and Internet Economics - 14th International Conference, WINE 2018, Oxford, UK, 15–17 December 2018, Proceedings, pp. 423–437 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Vetta, A.: Nash equilibria in competitive societies, with applications to facility location, traffic routing and auctions. In: FOCS (2002)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kostas Kollias .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Georgoulaki, E., Kollias, K. (2023). Arbitrary Profit Sharing in Federated Learning Utility Games. In: Deligkas, A., Filos-Ratsikas, A. (eds) Algorithmic Game Theory. SAGT 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14238. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43254-5_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43254-5_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-43253-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-43254-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics