Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Symbiotic Approach of Mathematical and Computational Thinking

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Towards a Collaborative Society Through Creative Learning (WCCE 2022)

Part of the book series: IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology ((IFIPAICT,volume 685))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 928 Accesses

Abstract

Although CT is a rapidly expanding field of educational research, it is a relatively new concept in official national curricula. From the perspective of curriculum policy, CT is closest to two subjects taught in primary and secondary schools: computing/informatics and mathematics. Since informatics is not present as a separate subject in many countries, proponents of CT should find alternative routes for introducing this new body of knowledge in curricula. There are three main ways as to how it has been done in various countries: (A) adding CT into the existing informatics/computing curriculum, (B) integrating CT in the curriculum of some other subject – most likely, mathematics, and (C) introducing CT through cross-curriculum theme and interdisciplinary STEM/STEAM projects. This paper discusses the similarities and differences of computational and mathematical thinking that could potentially empower each other though meaningful integration in math lessons. Using the cases of Finland, Estonia, and Lithuania as examples, different approaches to integrating computational thinking into K-12 education will be contrasted and compared.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wing, J.M.: Computational thinking. Commun. ACM 49(3), 33–35 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Grover, S., Pea, R.: Computational thinking in K–12: a review of the state of the field. Educ. Res. 42(1), 38–43 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Papert, S.: “Mindstorms” Children. Computers and Powerful Ideas.Basic books, Inc., Publishers/New York (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Tang, X., Yin, Y., Lin, Q., Hadad, R., Zhai, X.: Assessing computational thinking: a systematic review of empirical studies. Comput. Educ. 148, 103798 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brennan, K., Resnick, M.: New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking. In: Proceedings of the 2012 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Vancouver, Canada, pp. 1–25 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Weintrop, D., et al.: Defining computational thinking for mathematics and science classrooms. J. Sci. Educ. Technol. 25(1), 127–147 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Denner, J., Werner, L., Ortiz, E.: Computer games created by middle school girls: can they be used to measure understanding of computer science concepts? Comput. Educ. 58(1), 240–249 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Selby, C., Woollard, J.: Computational Thinking: the Developing Definition. University of Southampton (E-prints), UK (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  9. ISTE, CSTA. Operational Definition of Computational Thinking for K-12 Education (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Yadav, A., Hong, H., Stephenson, C.: Computational thinking for all: pedagogical approaches to embedding 21st century problem solving in K-12 classrooms. TechTrends 60(6), 565–568 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gadanidis, G., Clements, E., Yiu, C.: Group theory, computational thinking, and young mathematicians. Math. Think. Learn. 20(1), 32–53 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kotsopoulos, D., et al.: A pedagogical framework for computational thinking. Dig. Experiences Math. Educ. 3(2), 154–171 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bocconi, S., Chioccariello, A., Earp, J.: The Nordic approach to introducing Computational Thinking and programming in compulsory education. Report prepared for the Nordic@ BETT2018 Steering Group, pp. 397–400. National Research Council of Italy, Institute for Educational Technology (CNR-ITD), Palermo, Italy (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Burton, L.: Mathematical thinking: The struggle for meaning. J. Res. Math. Educ. 15(1), 35–49 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Polya, G.: Mathematical Discovery: On Understanding, Learning and Teaching Problem Solving, 2 vol. combined, 1981st edn. John Wiley & Sons, New York (1965)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Harel, G., Sowder, L.: Advanced mathematical-thinking at any age: its nature and its development. Math. Think. Learn. 7(1), 27–50 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cuoco, A., Goldenberg, E.P., Mark, J.: Habits of mind: an organizing principle for mathematics curricula. J. Math. Behav. 15(4), 375–402 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. OECD: PISA 2015 Assessment and Analytical Framework: Science, Reading, Mathematic, Financial Literacy and Collaborative Problem Solving, revised edition. PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  19. OECD: PISA 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework. PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  20. PISA, OECD: Mathematics Framework (Draft). Retrieved from PISA (2022). https://pisa2022-maths.oecd.org/files/PISA%202022%20Mathematics%20Framework%20Draft.pdf. Last accessed 22 May 2023

  21. Halmos, P.R.: The heart of mathematics. Am. Math. Mon. 87(7), 519–524 (1980)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Stanic, G., Kilpatrick, J.: Historical perspectives on problem solving in the mathematics curriculum. In: Charles, R., Silver, E. (eds.) The teaching and assessing of mathematical problem solving, pp. 1–22. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, VA (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wing, J.M.: Computational thinking and thinking about computing. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A: Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 366(1881), 3717–3725 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Sneider, C., Stephenson, C., Schafer, B., Flick, L.: Exploring the science framework and NGSS: computational thinking in the science classroom. Sci. Scope 38(3), 10 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bråting, K., Kilhamn, C.: Exploring the intersection of algebraic and computational thinking. Math. Think. Learn. 23(2), 170–185 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Malara, N.A., Navarra, G.: New words and concepts for early algebra teaching: sharing with teachers epistemological issues in early algebra to develop students’ early algebraic thinking. In: Kieran, C. (ed.) Teaching and Learning Algebraic Thinking with 5-to 12-Year-Olds, pp. 51–77. Springer, Cham (2018)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Pei, C., Weintrop, D., Wilensky, U.: Cultivating computational thinking practices and mathematical habits of mind in lattice land. Math. Think. Learn. 20(1), 75–89 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kallia, M., van Borkulo, S.P., Drijvers, P., Barendsen, E., Tolboom, J.: Characterising computational thinking in mathematics education: a literature-informed Delphi study. Res. Math. Educ. 23(2), 159–187 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Stephens, M., Kadijevich, D.M.: Computational/algorithmic thinking. In: Lerman, S: (ed.) Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education, pp. 117–123. Springer, Cham (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Dagiene, V., Stupuriene, G.: Bebras – a sustainable community building model for the concept based learning of informatics and computational thinking. Inform. Educ. 15(1), 25–44 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Bocconi, S., Chioccariello, A., Dettori, G., Ferrari, A., Engelhardt, K.: Developing computational thinking in compulsory education-Implications for policy and practice (No. JRC104188). Joint Research Centre, Seville (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Bocconi, S., et al.: Reviewing Computational Thinking in Compulsory Education, JRC128347. In: Inamorato Dos Santos, A., Cachia, R., Giannoutsou, N., Punie, Y. (eds.). Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kupiainen, S., Hautamäki, J., Karjalainen, T.: The Finnish education system and PISA. opetus-ja kulttuuriministeriö (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Maaranen, K., Stenberg, K.: Teacher effectiveness in finland: effectiveness in finnish schools. In: Grant, L.W., Stronge, J.H., Xu, X. (eds.) International Beliefs and Practices That Characterize Teacher Effectiveness, pp. 125–147. IGI Global, Hershey, PA (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Eurydice: Finland: Compulsory education extended until the age of 18. https://eacea.ec.europa.eu/national-policies/eurydice/content/finland-compulsory-education-extended-until-age-18_en. Last accessed 26 Mar 2022

  36. Estonian Education System: https://www.educationestonia.org/about-education-system/, Last accessed 26 Mar 2022

  37. Preschool, basic and secondary education: https://www.hm.ee/en/activities/pre-school-basic-and-secondary-education. Last accessed 26 Mar 2022

  38. Niemelä, P., Pears, A., Dagienė, V., Laanpere, M.: Computational thinking–forces shaping curriculum and policy in Finland, Sweden and the Baltic Countries. In: Passey, D., Leahy, D., Williams, L., Holvikivi, J., Ruohonen, M. (eds.) Digital Transformation of Education and Learning – Past, Present and Future. OCCE 2021. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol. 642, pp. 131–143. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97986-7_11

  39. Haaristo, H.-S., et al.: Elukestva õppe strateegia vahehindamine. Tallinn: Poliitikauuringute Keskus Praxis, Rakendusuuringute Keskus CentAR (2019)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Tallinn University, Narva Road 25, 10120, Tallinn, Estonia

    Kristin Parve & Mart Laanpere

Authors
  1. Kristin Parve
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mart Laanpere
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mart Laanpere .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. School of Education, La Trobe University, Deepdene, VIC, Australia

    Therese Keane

  2. Education and Social Research Institute, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK

    Cathy Lewin

  3. University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany

    Torsten Brinda

  4. Istituto Tecnologie Didattiche, Consiglio Nazioanale delle Ricerche, Genoa, Genova, Italy

    Rosa Bottino

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Parve, K., Laanpere, M. (2023). Symbiotic Approach of Mathematical and Computational Thinking. In: Keane, T., Lewin, C., Brinda, T., Bottino, R. (eds) Towards a Collaborative Society Through Creative Learning. WCCE 2022. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 685. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43393-1_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43393-1_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-43392-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-43393-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships