Skip to main content

Towards Minimising Perturbation Rate for Adversarial Machine Learning with Pruning

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases: Research Track (ECML PKDD 2023)

Abstract

Deep neural networks can be potentially vulnerable to adversarial samples. For example, by introducing tiny perturbations in the data sample, the model behaviour may be significantly altered. While the adversarial samples can be leveraged to enhance the model robustness and performance with adversarial training, one critical attribute of the adversarial samples is the perturbation rate. A lower perturbation rate means a smaller difference between the adversarial and the original sample. It results in closer features learnt from the model for the adversarial and original samples, resulting in higher-quality adversarial samples. How to design a successful attacking algorithm with a minimum perturbation rate remains challenging. In this work, we consider pruning algorithms to dynamically minimise the perturbation rate for adversarial attacks. In particularly, we propose, for the first time, an attribution based perturbation reduction method named Min-PR for white-box adversarial attacks. The comprehensive experiment results demonstrate Min-PR can achieve minimal perturbation rates of adversarial samples while providing guarantee to train robust models. The code in this paper is available at: https://github.com/LMBTough/Min-PR.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ain, Q.T., et al.: Sentiment analysis using deep learning techniques: a review. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. 8(6) (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bai, T., Luo, J., Zhao, J., Wen, B., Wang, Q.: Recent advances in adversarial training for adversarial robustness. arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.01356 (2021)

  3. Cao, W., Wang, X., Ming, Z., Gao, J.: A review on neural networks with random weights. Neurocomputing 275, 278–287 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Carlini, N., Wagner, D.: Towards evaluating the robustness of neural networks. In: 2017 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP), pp. 39–57. IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dong, S., Wang, P., Abbas, K.: A survey on deep learning and its applications. Comput. Sci. Rev. 40, 100379 (2021)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Dong, Y., et al.: Boosting adversarial attacks with momentum. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 9185–9193 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Goodfellow, I.J., Shlens, J., Szegedy, C.: Explaining and harnessing adversarial examples. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6572 (2014)

  8. He, Y., Meng, G., Chen, K., Hu, X., He, J.: Towards security threats of deep learning systems: a survey. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 48(5), 1743–1770 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Janiesch, C., Zschech, P., Heinrich, K.: Machine learning and deep learning. Electron. Markets 31(3), 685–695 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim, H., Park, J., Lee, J.: Generating transferable adversarial examples for speech classification. Pattern Recognit. 137, 109286 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kurakin, A., Goodfellow, I.J., Bengio, S.: Adversarial machine learning at scale. In: International Conference on Learning Representations

    Google Scholar 

  12. LeCun, Y., Denker, J., Solla, S.: Optimal brain damage. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 2 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  13. LeCun, Y., Denker, J., Solla, S.: Optimal brain damage. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 2 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Liao, F., Liang, M., Dong, Y., Pang, T., Hu, X., Zhu, J.: Defense against adversarial attacks using high-level representation guided denoiser. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 1778–1787 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lin, Y., Zhao, H., Tu, Y., Mao, S., Dou, Z.: Threats of adversarial attacks in DNN-based modulation recognition. In: IEEE INFOCOM 2020-IEEE Conference on Computer Communications, pp. 2469–2478. IEEE (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Madry, A., Makelov, A., Schmidt, L., Tsipras, D., Vladu, A.: Towards deep learning models resistant to adversarial attacks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.06083 (2017)

  17. Molchanov, P., Mallya, A., Tyree, S., Frosio, I., Kautz, J.: Importance estimation for neural network pruning. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 11264–11272 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nasr, M., Shokri, R., Houmansadr, A.: Comprehensive privacy analysis of deep learning: passive and active white-box inference attacks against centralized and federated learning. In: 2019 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP), pp. 739–753. IEEE (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nazemi, A., Fieguth, P.: Potential adversarial samples for white-box attacks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.06409 (2019)

  20. Papernot, N., McDaniel, P., Goodfellow, I., Jha, S., Celik, Z.B., Swami, A.: Practical black-box attacks against machine learning. In: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Asia Conference on Computer and Communications Security, pp. 506–519 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Perez, L., Wang, J.: The effectiveness of data augmentation in image classification using deep learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1712.04621 (2017)

  22. Reed, R.: Pruning algorithms-a survey. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 4(5), 740–747 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Song, Z.: English speech recognition based on deep learning with multiple features. Computing 102(3), 663–682 (2020)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Sundararajan, M., Taly, A., Yan, Q.: Axiomatic attribution for deep networks. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 3319–3328. PMLR (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Szegedy, C., et al.: Intriguing properties of neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.6199 (2013)

  26. Wang, K., Li, F., Chen, C.M., Hassan, M.M., Long, J., Kumar, N.: Interpreting adversarial examples and robustness for deep learning-based auto-driving systems. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transport. Syst. 23(7), 9755–9764 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang, Y., Ma, X., Bailey, J., Yi, J., Zhou, B., Gu, Q.: On the convergence and robustness of adversarial training. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.08304 (2021)

  28. Wong, E., Kolter, Z.: Provable defenses against adversarial examples via the convex outer adversarial polytope. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 5286–5295. PMLR (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Xiao, C., Li, B., Zhu, J.Y., He, W., Liu, M., Song, D.: Generating adversarial examples with adversarial networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1801.02610 (2018)

  30. Zhang, J., et al.: Improving adversarial transferability via neuron attribution-based attacks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 14993–15002 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Zhong, Y., Deng, W.: Towards transferable adversarial attack against deep face recognition. IEEE Trans. Inform. Forens. Secur. 16, 1452–1466 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhou, S., Liu, C., Ye, D., Zhu, T., Zhou, W., Yu, P.S.: Adversarial attacks and defenses in deep learning: from a perspective of cybersecurity. ACM Comput. Surv. 55(8), 1–39 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Huaming Chen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Zhu, Z. et al. (2023). Towards Minimising Perturbation Rate for Adversarial Machine Learning with Pruning. In: Koutra, D., Plant, C., Gomez Rodriguez, M., Baralis, E., Bonchi, F. (eds) Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases: Research Track. ECML PKDD 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 14169. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43412-9_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43412-9_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-43411-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-43412-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics