Skip to main content

Assessing Knowledge Graphs Accountability

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
The Semantic Web: ESWC 2023 Satellite Events (ESWC 2023)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 13998))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Demand for accountability is increasing, driven by the growth of open data and e-governments. Accountability requires specific and fairly accurate information about people’s responsibilities and actions. Studies on data quality or FAIRness do not have a specific focus on that aspect. Therefore, we describe our approach to evaluate the accountability of several knowledge graphs of the LOD cloud and the results obtained.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://github.com/Jendersen/KG_accountability.

  2. 2.

    https://github.com/Jendersen/KG_accountability/tree/main/results.

References

  1. Amdouni, E., Bouazzouni, S., Jonquet, C.: O’FAIRe: Ontology FAIRness evaluator in the agroportal semantic resource repository. In: Groth, P., et al. (eds.) ESWC 2022–19th Extended Semantic Web Conference, Poster and Demonstration. Springer, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11609-4_17

  2. Färber, M., Bartscherer, F., Menne, C., Rettinger, A.: Linked data quality of DBpedia, Freebase, OpenCYC, Wikidata, and YAGO. Semant. Web 9(1), 77–129 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Maillot, P., Corby, O., Faron, C., Gandon, F., Michel, F.: IndeGx: a model and a framework for indexing RDF knowledge graphs with SPARQL-based test suits. J. Web Semant. 76, 100775 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Oppold, S., Herschel, M.: Accountable data analytics start with accountable data: the liquid metadata model. In: ER Forum/Posters/Demos, pp. 59–72 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rosnet, T., de Lamotte, F., Devignes, M.D., Lefort, V., Gaignard, A.: FAIR-checker - supporting the findability and reusability of digital life science resources (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Weitzner, D.J., Abelson, H., Berners-Lee, T., Feigenbaum, J., Hendler, J., Sussman, G.J.: Information accountability. Commun. ACM 51(6), 82–87 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zaveri, A., Rula, A., Maurino, A., Pietrobon, R., Lehmann, J., Auer, S.: Quality assessment for linked data: a survey. Semant. Web 7(1), 63–93 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the ANR DeKaloG (Decentralized Knowledge Graphs) project, ANR-19-CE23-0014, CE23 - Intelligence artificielle.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jennie Andersen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Andersen, J., Cazalens, S., Lamarre, P. (2023). Assessing Knowledge Graphs Accountability. In: Pesquita, C., et al. The Semantic Web: ESWC 2023 Satellite Events. ESWC 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13998. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43458-7_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43458-7_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-43457-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-43458-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics