Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has proven effective in assisting manufacturing companies to achieve Zero Defect Manufacturing. However, certain products may have quality characteristics that are challenging to verify in a manufacturing facility. This could be due to several factors, including the product’s complexity, a lack of available data or information, or the need for specialized testing or analysis. Prior research on using AI for challenging quality detection is limited. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to identify the enablers that contributed to the development of an AI-based defect detection approach in an industrial setting. A case study was conducted at a transmission axle assembly factory where an end-of-line defect detection test was being developed with the help of vibration sensors. This study demonstrates that it was possible to rapidly acquire domain expertise by experimenting, which contributed to the identification of important features to characterize defects. A regression model simulating the normal vibration behavior of transmission axles was created and could be used to detect anomalies by evaluating the deviation of new products compared to the model. The approach could be validated by creating an axle with a built-in defect. Five enablers were considered key to this development.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bisgaard, S., Kulahci, M.: Quality quandaries: the effect of autocorrelation on statistical process control procedures. Qual. Eng. 17(3), 481–489 (2005)
Zan, T., Liu, Z., Wang, H., Wang, M., Gao, X.: Control chart pattern recognition using the convolutional neural network. J. Intell. Manuf. 31, 703–716 (2020)
Powell, D., Magnanini, M.C., Colledani, M., Myklebust, O.: Advancing zero defect manufacturing: a state-of-the-art perspective and future research directions. Comput. Ind. 136, 103596 (2022)
Caiazzo, B., Di Nardo, M., Murino, T., Petrillo, A., Piccirillo, G., Santini, S.: Towards zero defect manufacturing paradigm: a review of the state-of-the-art methods and open challenges. Comput. Ind. 134, 103548 (2022)
Psarommatis, F., May, G., Dreyfus, P.A., Kiritsis, D.: Zero defect manufacturing: state-of-the-art review, shortcomings and future directions in research. Int. J. Prod. Res. 58(1), 1–17 (2020)
Saltz, J.S., Krasteva, I.: Current approaches for executing big data science projects-a systematic literature review. PeerJ Comput. Sci. 8, e862 (2022)
Bertolini, M., Mezzogori, D., Neroni, M., Zammori, F.: Machine learning for industrial applications: a comprehensive literature review. Expert Syst. Appl. 175, 114820 (2021)
Zhou, P., Chen, W., Yi, C., Jiang, Z., Yang, T., Chai, T.: Fast just-in-time-learning recursive multi-output LSSVR for quality prediction and control of multivariable dynamic systems. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 100, 104168 (2021)
Cook, V.G.C., Ali, A.: End-of-line inspection for annoying noises in automobiles: trends and perspectives. Appl. Acoust. 73(3), 265–275 (2012)
Andersson, T., Bohlin, M., Olsson, T., Ahlskog, M.: Comparison of machine learning’s-and humans’-ability to consistently classify anomalies in cylinder locks. In: Kim, D.Y., von Cieminski, G., Romero, D. (eds.) Advances in Production Management Systems. Smart Manufacturing and Logistics Systems: Turning Ideas into Action. APMS 2022. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, Part I, vol. 663, pp. 27–34. Springer, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16407-1_4
Russell, S.J.: Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. Pearson Education, Inc., Upper Saddle River (2010)
Papageorgiou, E.I., et al.: Short survey of artificial intelligent technologies for defect detection in manufacturing. In: 2021 12th International Conference on Information, Intelligence, Systems & Applications (IISA), pp. 1–7. IEEE (2021)
Hilal, W., Gadsden, S.A., Yawney, J.: Financial fraud: a review of anomaly detection techniques and recent advances (2022)
Tschuchnig, M.E., Gadermayr, M.: Anomaly detection in medical imaging - a mini review. In: Haber, P., Lampoltshammer, T.J., Leopold, H., Mayr, M. (eds.) Data Science – Analytics and Applications, pp. 33–38. Springer, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-36295-9_5
Fernandes, G., Rodrigues, J.J., Carvalho, L.F., Al-Muhtadi, J.F., Proença, M.L.: A comprehensive survey on network anomaly detection. Telecommun. Syst. 70, 447–489 (2019)
Kamat, P., Sugandhi, R.: Anomaly detection for predictive maintenance in Industry 4.0-a survey. E3S Web Conf. 170, 02007 (2020)
Zipfel, J., Verworner, F., Fischer, M., Wieland, U., Kraus, M., Zschech, P.: Anomaly detection for industrial quality assurance: a comparative evaluation of unsupervised deep learning models. Comput. Ind. Eng. 177, 109045 (2023)
Gharibnezhad, F., Mujica, L.E., Rodellar, J.: Applying robust variant of principal component analysis as a damage detector in the presence of outliers. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 50, 467–479 (2015)
Lindemann, B., Jazdi, N., Weyrich, M.: Anomaly detection and prediction in discrete manufacturing based on cooperative LSTM networks. In: 2020 IEEE 16th International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE), pp. 1003–1010. IEEE (2020)
Montgomery, D.C.: Introduction to Statistical Quality Control. Wiley, New York (2020)
Karlsson, C.: Researching Operations Management. Routledge, London (2010)
Yin, R.K.: Case Study Research: Design and Methods, vol. 5. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2009)
Leberruyer, N., Bruch, J., Ahlskog, M., Afshar, S.: Toward zero defect manufacturing with the support of artificial intelligence-insights from an industrial application. Comput. Ind. 147, 103877 (2023)
Shwartz-Ziv, R., Armon, A.: Tabular data: deep learning is not all you need. Inf. Fusion 81, 84–90 (2022)
Grinsztajn, L., Oyallon, E., Varoquaux, G.: Why do tree-based models still outperform deep learning on tabular data? arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.08815 (2022)
Chen, T., Guestrin, C.: XGBoost: a scalable tree boosting system. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 785–794 (2016)
Lade, P., Ghosh, R., Srinivasan, S.: Manufacturing analytics and industrial internet of things. IEEE Intell. Syst. 32(3), 74–79 (2017)
Azamfirei, V., Psarommatis, F., Lagrosen, Y.: Application of automation for in-line quality inspection, a zero-defect manufacturing approach. J. Manuf. Syst. 67, 1–22 (2023)
Acknowledgements
This work was partially supported by the Industrial Technology (IndTech) Graduate School founded by the Knowledge Foundation (KKS, Stockholm, Sweden) and the XPRES project funded by Vinnova (Stockholm, Sweden). The authors express gratitude for the reviewers’ constructive feedback.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Leberruyer, N., Bruch, J., Ahlskog, M., Afshar, S. (2023). Enabling an AI-Based Defect Detection Approach to Facilitate Zero Defect Manufacturing. In: Alfnes, E., Romsdal, A., Strandhagen, J.O., von Cieminski, G., Romero, D. (eds) Advances in Production Management Systems. Production Management Systems for Responsible Manufacturing, Service, and Logistics Futures. APMS 2023. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 690. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43666-6_43
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43666-6_43
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-43665-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-43666-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)