Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Servitization and Industry 5.0: The Future Trends of Manufacturing Transformation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Production Management Systems. Production Management Systems for Responsible Manufacturing, Service, and Logistics Futures (APMS 2023)

Part of the book series: IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology ((IFIPAICT,volume 690))

  • 1298 Accesses

Abstract

Industry 5.0 represents a new strategy for manufacturing firms in the 21st century. Additionally, the new concepts of Industry 5.0 are developed based on Industry 4.0 and its obstacles in implementation. The existence of Digital Servitization is the result of the relationship between Industry 4.0 and Traditional Servitization. However, the relationship between Industry 5.0 concepts and Servitization is still neglected in the research. This paper has the aim of showing the relationship between Industry 5.0 concepts and Servitization. The data for this research were obtained through the Serbian dataset from the European Manufacturing Survey conducted in 2022. The results of the research show the levels of implementation of Industry 5.0 concepts (i.e., human-centricity, sustainability, and resilience). Additional results show the level of Servitization implementation (i.e., traditional and digital services). Finally, the results show the correlation analysis between Industry 5.0 and the implementation of the Servitization concepts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Baines, T., Lightfoot, H.: Made to Serve: How Manufacturers can Compete Through Servitization and Product–Service Systems. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd (2012). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119207955

  2. Moreno, R., Marques, L., Arkader, R.: Servitization impact on performance moderated by country development. BIJ 27, 302–318 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-10-2018-0311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Rakic, S., Pero, M., Sianesi, A., Marjanovic, U.: Digital servitization and firm performance. Technol. Intensity Approach. EE 33, 398–413 (2022). https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.33.4.29649

  4. Reim, W., Parida, V., Örtqvist, D.: Product-service systems (PSS) business models and tactics – a systematic literature review. J. Clean. Prod. 97, 61–75 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.07.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jankovic-Zugic, A., Medic, N., Pavlovic, M., et al.: Servitization 4.0 as a trigger for sustainable business: evidence from automotive digital supply chain. Sustainability 15, 2217 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032217

  6. Rakic, S., Visnjic, I., Gaiardelli, P., et al.: Transformation of manufacturing firms: towards digital servitization. In: Dolgui, A., Bernard, A., Lemoine, D., et al. (eds.) Advances in Production Management Systems, pp. 153–161. Springer International Publishing, Cham, Artificial Intelligence for Sustainable and Resilient Production Systems (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Xu, X., Lu, Y., Vogel-Heuser, B., Wang, L.: Industry 4.0 and Industry 5.0—inception, conception and perception. J. Manuf. Syst. 61, 530–535 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.10.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Xu, L.D., Xu, E.L., Li, L.: Industry 4.0: state of the art and future trends. Int. J. Prod. Res. 56, 2941–2962 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1444806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lasi, H., Fettke, P., Kemper, H.-G., et al.: Industry 4.0. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 6, 239–242 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-014-0334-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lalic, D.C., Gracanin, D., Lolic, T., Lalic, B., Simeunovic, N.: Digital transformation in the engineering research area: scientific performance and strategic themes. In: Kim, D.Y., von Cieminski, G., Romero, D. (eds.) Advances in Production Management Systems. Smart Manufacturing and Logistics Systems: Turning Ideas into Action. APMS 2022. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 664, pp 196–204. Springer, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16411-8_25

  11. Majerník, M., Daneshjo, N., Malega, P., et al.: Sustainable development of the intelligent industry from industry 4.0 to industry 5.0. Adv. Sci. Technol. Res. J. 16, 12–18 (2022). https://doi.org/10.12913/22998624/146420

  12. Rüßmann, M., Lorenz, M., Gerbert, P., et al.: Industry 4.0: the future of productivity and growth in manufacturing. BCG Perspect. 1–16 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ennis, C., Barnett, N., De Cesare, S., et al.: A conceptual framework for servitization in industry 4.0: distilling directions for future research. SSRN J. (2020). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3529276

  14. Lezzi, M., Lazoi, M., Corallo, A.: Cybersecurity for industry 4.0 in the current literature: a reference framework. Comput. Ind. 103, 97–110 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.com-pind.2018.09.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ngo, T.D., Kashani, A., Imbalzano, G., et al.: Additive manufacturing (3D printing): a review of materials, methods, applications and challenges. Compos. B Eng. 143, 172–196 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Carmigniani, J., Furht, B., Anisetti, M., et al.: Augmented reality technologies, systems and applications. Multimed Tools Appl. 51, 341–377 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-010-0660-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee, J., Kao, H.-A., Yang, S.: Service innovation and smart analytics for industry 4.0 and big data environment. Procedia CIRP 16, 3–8 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.02.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Slavic, D.: The main concepts of industry 5.0: a bibliometric analysis approach. In: 2023 22nd International Symposium Infoteh-Jahorina (Infoteh). IEEE, East Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina, pp. 1–5 (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Javaid, M., Haleem, A., Singh, R.P., et al.: Industry 5.0: potential applications in COVID-19. J. Ind. Int. Manag. 05, 507–530 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424862220500220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Javaid, M., Haleem, A.: Critical components of industry 5.0 towards a successful adoption in the field of manufacturing. J. Ind. Int. Manag. 05, 327–348 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424862220500141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Potočan, V., Mulej, M., Nedelko, Z.: Society 5.0: balancing of Industry 4.0, economic advancement and social problems. Kybernetes 50, 794–811 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1108/K-12-2019-0858

  22. Durmaz, A., Kitapcı, H.: Revisiting customer involved value chains under the conceptual light of industry 5.0. PES 3, 207–216 (2022). https://doi.org/10.24874/PES03.02.008

  23. Rakic, S., Pavlovic, M., Marjanovic, U.: A precondition of sustainability: industry 4.0 readiness. Sustainability 13, 6641 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126641

  24. Bressanelli, G., Adrodegari, F., Perona, M., Saccani, N.: Exploring how usage-focused business models enable circular economy through digital technologies. Sustainability 10, 639 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Dakovic, M., Lalic, B., Delic, M., et al.: Systematic mitigation of model sensitivity in the initiation phase of energy projects. Adv. Produc. Eng. Manag. 15, 217–232 (2020). https://doi.org/10.14743/apem2020.2.360

  26. Owusu, P.A., Asumadu-Sarkodie, S.: A review of renewable energy sources, sustainability issues and climate change mitigation. Cogent Eng. 3, 1167990 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2016.1167990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ostrom, E.: A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science 325, 419–422 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1172133

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Gu, X., Jin, X., Ni, J., Koren, Y.: Manufacturing system design for resilience. Procedia CIRP 36, 135–140 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.02.075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ciric Lalic, D., Lalic, B., Delić, M., et al.: How project management approach impact project success? from traditional to agile. IJMPB 15, 494–521 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-04-2021-0108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sofic, A., Rakic, S., Pezzotta, G., et al.: Smart and resilient transformation of manufacturing firms. Processes 10, 2674 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10122674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Rapaccini, M., Saccani, N., Kowalkowski, C., et al.: Navigating disruptive crises through service-led growth: The impact of COVID-19 on Italian manufacturing firms. Ind. Mark. Manage. 88, 225–237 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.05.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Mourtzis, D., Angelopoulos, J., Panopoulos, N.: Robust engineering for the design of resilient manufacturing systems. Appl. Sci. 11, 3067 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/app11073067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Li, J.H., Lin, L., Chen, D.P., Ma, L.Y.: An empirical study of servitization paradox in China. J. High Technol. Managem. Res. 26, 66–76 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hitech.2015.04.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Paschou, T., Rapaccini, M., Adrodegari, F., Saccani, N.: Digital servitization in manufacturing: a systematic literature review and research agenda. Ind. Mark. Manag. 89, 278–292 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.02.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Kohtamäki, M., Parida, V., Patel, P.C., Gebauer, H.: The relationship between digitalization and servitization: the role of servitization in capturing the financial potential of digitalization. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 151, 119804 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Marjanovic, U., Lalic, B., Majstorovic, V., Medic, N., Prester, J., Palcic, I.: How to increase share of product-related services in revenue? strategy towards servitization. In: Moon, I., Lee, G.M., Park, J., Kiritsis, D., von Cieminski, G. (eds.) APMS 2018. IAICT, vol. 536, pp. 57–64. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99707-0_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  37. Oliva, R., Kallenberg, R.: Managing the transition from products to services. Int. J. Serv. Ind. Manag. 14, 160–172 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1108/09564230310474138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Gračanin, D., Ćirić, D., Lalić, B., et al.: The impact of lean improvements on cost-time profile. Procedia Manufact. 38, 316–323 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.01.041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Beuren, F.H., Gomes Ferreira, M.G., Cauchick Miguel, P.A.: Product-service systems: a literature review on integrated products and services. J. Clean. Prod. 47, 222–231 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Tukker, A.: Eight types of product–service system: eight ways to sustainability? experiences from SusProNet. Bus. Strat. Env. 13, 246–260 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Baines, T., Shi, V.G.: A Delphi study to explore the adoption of servitization in UK companies. Product. Planning Control 26, 1171–1187 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2015.1033490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Salunkhe, O., Berglund, Å.F.: Stena recycling international AB, Gothenburg, Sweden industry 4.0 enabling technologies for increasing operational flexibility in final assembly. Int. J. Ind. Eng. Manag. 13, 38–48 (2022). https://doi.org/10.24867/IJIEM-2022-1-299

  43. Sabioni, R.C., Daaboul, J.: Université de technologie de Compiègne, Roberval (Mechanics energy and electricity), Centre de recherche Royallieu - CS 60 319 - 60 203 Compiègne Cedex, France, et al (2022) joint optimization of product configuration and process planning in reconfigurable manufacturing systems. Int. J. Ind. Eng. Manag. 13, 58–75 (2022). https://doi.org/10.24867/IJIEM-2022-1-301

  44. Bastos, T., Salvadorinho, J.: Institute of electronics and informatics engineering of aveiro (IEETA), University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal, et al UpSkill@Mgmt 4.0 – a digital tool for competence management: conceptual model and a prototype. Int. J. Ind. Eng. Manag. 13, 225–238 (2022). https://doi.org/10.24867/IJIEM-2022-4-315

  45. Jankovic, A., Adrodegari, F., Saccani, N., Simeunovic, N.: Improving service business of industrial companies through data: conceptualization and application. Int. J. Ind. Eng. Manag. 13, 78–87 (2022). https://doi.org/10.24867/IJIEM-2022-2-302

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia

    Dragana Slavic, Ugljesa Marjanovic & Slavko Rakic

  2. University of Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy

    Giuditta Pezzotta

  3. CAMPUS 02, University of Applied Sciences, Graz, Austria

    Ioan Turcin

Authors
  1. Dragana Slavic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ugljesa Marjanovic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Giuditta Pezzotta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ioan Turcin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Slavko Rakic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ugljesa Marjanovic .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway

    Erlend Alfnes

  2. Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway

    Anita Romsdal

  3. Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway

    Jan Ola Strandhagen

  4. ZF Friedrichshafen AG, Friedrichshafen, Germany

    Gregor von Cieminski

  5. Tecnológico de Monterrey, Mexico City, Mexico

    David Romero

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Slavic, D., Marjanovic, U., Pezzotta, G., Turcin, I., Rakic, S. (2023). Servitization and Industry 5.0: The Future Trends of Manufacturing Transformation. In: Alfnes, E., Romsdal, A., Strandhagen, J.O., von Cieminski, G., Romero, D. (eds) Advances in Production Management Systems. Production Management Systems for Responsible Manufacturing, Service, and Logistics Futures. APMS 2023. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 690. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43666-6_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43666-6_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-43665-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-43666-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships