Abstract
In the data-rich but knowledge-poor domain of production management systems, the utilization of machine learning (ML) for lead-time prediction has gained increasing attention. Despite several efforts focusing on ML and regression techniques, the selection of features for lead-time prediction remains a challenge. The purpose of this study is to explore the socio-technical challenges and benefits of applying ML to predict lead-time in manually executed tasks in the biopharmaceutical industry, with a particular emphasis on the quality control of raw materials and semi-finished products. Through a case study and empirical analysis, the research identifies critical factors affecting lead-time prediction in manual tasks and evaluates the socio-technical implications of implementing ML-based solutions. Moreover, the study provides valuable insights into the practical challenges and potential advantages of adopting ML techniques for lead-time prediction in the biopharmaceutical sector, offering a comprehensive understanding of the complex interplay between technology and human factors. Finally, we discuss the implications of the findings for managers and staff responsible for the planning of manual tasks, providing actionable recommendations to improve production efficiency and lead-time prediction accuracy. This research contributes to the growing body of knowledge on the integration of ML in production management systems and highlights the need for further investigation to harness the full potential of ML in addressing the unique challenges of the biopharmaceutical industry.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Leachman, R., Johnston, L., Li, S., Shen, Z.: An automated planning engine for biopharmaceutical production. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 238, 327–338 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2014.03.002
Bender, J., Trat, M., Ovtcharova, J.: Benchmarking automl-supported lead-time prediction. Proc. Comput. Sci. 200, 482–494 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.01.246
Herrmann, T., Pfeiffer, S.: Keeping the organization in the loop: A socio-technical extension of human-centered artificial intelligence. AI and Society, pp. 1–20 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01391-5
Wuest, T., Weimer, D., Irgens, C., Thoben, K.D.: Machine learning in manufacturing: Advantages, challenges, and applications. Prod. Manufact. Res. 4(1), 23–45 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/21693277.2016.1192517
Sharma, A., Zhang, Z., Rai, R.: The interpretive model of manufacturing: a theoretical framework and research agenda for machine learning in manufacturing. Int. J. Prod. Res. 59(16), 4960–4994 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2021.1930234
Blackburn, M., Alexander, J., Legan, J.D., Klabjan, D.: Big data and the future of R and D management: The rise of big data and big data analytics will have significant implications for R and D and innovation management in the next decade. Res. Technol. Manage. 60(5), 43–51 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2017.1348135
Cimini, C., Boffelli, A., Lagorio, A., Kalchschmidt, M., Pinto, R.: How do industry 4.0 technologies influence organisational change? An empirical analysis of Italian SMEs. J. Manufact. Technol. Manage. 32(3), 695–721 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-04-2019-0135
Dogan, A., Birant, D.: Machine learning and data mining in manufacturing. Expert Syst. Appl. 166, 114060 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.114060
Wang, Z., Pel, A.J., Verma, T., Krishnakumari, P., van Brakel, P., van Oort, N.: Effectiveness of trip planner data in predicting short-term bus ridership. Transp. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol. 142, 103790 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2022.103790
Peres, R.S., Jia, X., Lee, J., Sun, K., Colombo, A.W., Barata, J.: Industrial artificial intelligence in industry 4.0-systematic review, challenges and outlook. IEEE Access 8, 220121–220139 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3042874
Zacarias, A.G.V., Reimann, P., Mitschang, B.: A framework to guide the selection and configuration of machine-learning-based data analytics solutions in manufacturing. Procedia CIRP 72, 153–158 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.03.215
Qi, X., Chen, G., Li, Y., Cheng, X., Li, C.: Applying neural-network-based machine learning to additive manufacturing: current applications, challenges, and future perspectives. Engineering 5(4), 721–729 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2019.04.012
Quatrini, E., Costantino, F., Di Gravio, G., Patriarca, R.: Machine learning for anomaly detection and process phase classification to improve safety and maintenance activities. J. Manufact. Syst. 56, 117–132 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.05.013
Marcon, É., Soliman, M., Gerstlberger, W., Frank, A. G.: Sociotechnical factors and industry 4.0: an integrative perspective for the adoption of smart manufacturing technologies. J. Manufact. Technol. Manage. 33(2), 259–286 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-01-2021-0017
Veile, J.W., Kiel, D., Müller, J.M., Voigt, K.I.: Lessons learned from industry 4.0 implementation in the German manufacturing industry. J. Manufact. Technol. Manage. 31(5), 977–997 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-08-2018-0270
Sjödin, D.R., Parida, V., Leksell, M., Petrovic, A.: Smart factory implementation and process innovation: A preliminary maturity model for leveraging digitalization in manufacturing moving to smart factories presents specific challenges that can be addressed through a structured approach focused on people, processes, and technologies. Res. Technol. Manage. 61(5), 22–31 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2018.1471277
Beier, G., Ullrich, A., Niehoff, S., Reißig, M., Habich, M.: Industry 4.0: How it is defined from a sociotechnical perspective and how much sustainability it includes - a literature review. J. Cleaner Product. 259, 120856 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120856
Lundgren, C., Berlin, C., Skoogh, A., Källström, A.: How industrial maintenance managers perceive socio-technical changes in leadership in the industry 4.0 context. Int. J. Prod. Res. ahead-of-print, 1–20 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2022.2101031
Tortorella, G., et al.: The impact of industry 4.0 on the relationship between TPM and maintenance performance. J. Manufact. Technol. Manage. 33(3), 489–520 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-10-2021-0399
Ketokivi, M., Choi, T.: Renaissance of case research as a scientific method. J. Oper. Manag. 32(5), 232–240 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2014.03.004
Meredith, J.: Building operations management theory through case and field research. J. Oper. Manag. 16(4), 441–454 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(98)00023-0
Bolaños, R.D.S., Barbalho, S.C.M.: Exploring product complexity and prototype lead-times to predict new product development cycle-times. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 235, 108077 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108077
Dyer, W.G., Wilkins, A.L.: Better stories, not better constructs, to generate better theory: A Rejoinder to Eisenhardt. Acad. Manage. Rev. 16(3), 613–619. https://doi.org/10.2307/258920
Eisenhardt, K.M., Graebner, M.E.: Theory building from cases: opportunities and challenges. Acad. Manag. J. 50(1), 25–32 (2007). https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2007.24160888
Zangiacomi, A., Pessot, E., Fornasiero, R., Bertetti, M., Sacco, M.: Moving towards digitalization: a multiple case study in manufacturing. Prod. Plann. Contr. 31(2–3), 143–157 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2019.1631468
Miles, M.B., Huberman, A.M., Saldaña, J.: Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook, 3rd edn. Sage, Los Angeles (2014)
Bertolini, M., Mezzogori, D., Neroni, M., Zammori, F.: Machine learning for industrial applications: A comprehensive literature review. Expert Syst. Appl. 175 114820-(2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.114820
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge the support of Swedish Innovation Agency (VINNOVA) and its funding program Produktion2030. This study is part of the EXPLAIN project (Explainable and Learning Production Logistics by Artificial Intelligence). The study received support from the Korea Institute for Advancement of Technology (KIAT) through a grant funded by the Korea Government (MOTIE) (P0017304, Human Resource Development Program for Industrial Innovation).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Flores-García, E., Nam, S.H., Jeong, Y., Wiktorsson, M., Woo, J.H. (2023). Beyond the Lab: Exploring the Socio-Technical Implications of Machine Learning in Biopharmaceutical Manufacturing. In: Alfnes, E., Romsdal, A., Strandhagen, J.O., von Cieminski, G., Romero, D. (eds) Advances in Production Management Systems. Production Management Systems for Responsible Manufacturing, Service, and Logistics Futures. APMS 2023. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 691. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43670-3_32
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43670-3_32
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-43669-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-43670-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)