Skip to main content

Abstract

Industry 4.0 is providing unprecedented opportunities for the capture and use of data into production planning and control (PPC). The accuracy of such data for PPC has been found to have a direct positive effect on operational performance. This study builds on a dynamic approach where production feedback data is used to improve the accuracy of master data used in tactical planning. The study applies a model-based approach using data from a real case. Two illustrative sensitivity analyses indicate that even small deviations in the accuracy of master data have an impact on the production schedule in terms of job sequence and makespan. The paper's main theoretical contribution is the development of six propositions on this relationship, where in short, the sequence appears to be sensitive to the accuracy of both changeover time and processing time. The paper illustrates how sensitivity analysis can be used in investment decisions about which production feedback data to capture and use for PPC purposes. Further research should test the propositions in more real cases and other production environments and carry out sensitivity analyses with more types of master data, variables, and combinations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bueno, A.F., Godinho Filho, M., Frank, A.G.: Smart production planning and control in the Industry 4.0 context: a systematic literature review. Comput. Indust. Eng. 106774 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Oluyisola, O.E., Sgarbossa, F., Strandhagen, J.O.: Smart production planning and control: concept, use-cases and sustainability implications. Sustainability 12(9), 3791 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Oluyisola, O.E., et al.: Designing and developing smart production planning and control systems in the industry 4.0 era: a methodology and case study. J. Intell. Manufac. 33(1), 311–332 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Schäfers, P., Mütze, A., Nyhuis, P.: Integrated concept for acquisition and utilization of production feedback data to support production planning and control in the age of digitalization. Procedia Manufac. 31, 225–231 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Schuh, G., et al.: Achieving higher scheduling accuracy in production control by implementing integrity rules for production feedback data. Procedia CIRP 19, 142–147 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Reuter, C., Brambring, F.: Improving data consistency in production control. Procedia CIRP 41, 51–56 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chae, B.K., et al.: The impact of advanced analytics and data accuracy on operational performance: a contingent resource based theory (RBT) perspective. Decis. Support Syst. 59, 119–126 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Oluyisola, O.E.: Towards Smart Production Planning and Control: Frameworks and case studies investigating the enhancement of production planning and control using internet-of-things, data analytics and machine learning. NTNU (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Schuh, G., et al.: Increasing data integrity for improving decision making in production planning and control. CIRP Ann. 66(1), 425–428 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rahmani, M., et al.: Smart production planning and control; concept for improving planning quality with production feedback data. In: Alfnes, E., et al.(eds.) IFIP Advances in Production Management Systems: Production Management Systems for Responsible Manufacturing, Service, and Logistics Futures, forthcoming, Springer

    Google Scholar 

  11. Slack, N., Brandon-Jones, A., Johnston, R.: Operations Management, 7th edn. Pearson (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jacobs, F.R., et al.: Manufacturing planning and control for supply chain management: APICS/CPIM Certification Edition. McGraw-Hill Education (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Abd Elmonem, M.A., Nasr, E.S., Geith, M.H.: Benefits and challenges of cloud ERP systems–a systematic literature review. Future Comput. Inform. J. 1(1-2), 1–9 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Arica, E., Powell, D.J.: A framework for ICT-enabled real-time production planning and control. Adv. Manufac. 2(2), 158–164 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Klaus, H., Rosemann, M., Gable, G.G.: What is ERP? Inf. Syst. Front. 2(2), 141–162 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sagegg, O.J., Alfnes, E.: ERP Systems for Manufacturing Supply Chains: Applications, Configuration, and Performance. CRC Press (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jakubiak, M.: The Concept of Minimizing Master Data in The Production Planning Process on The Example of ERP Software (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Knolmayer, G.F., Röthlin, M.: Quality of material master data and its effect on the usefulness of distributed ERP systems. In: Roddick, J.F., et al. (eds.) ER 2006. LNCS, vol. 4231, pp. 362–371. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/11908883_43

  19. Geiger, F., Reinhart, G.: Knowledge-based machine scheduling under consideration of uncertainties in master data. Prod. Eng. 10, 197–207 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rahmani, M., et al.: Towards smart production planning and control; a conceptual framework linking planning environment characteristics with the need for smart production planning and control. Ann. Rev. Control (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  21. De Man, J.C., Strandhagen, J.O.: Spreadsheet application still dominates enterprise resource planning and advanced planning systems. Ifac-Papersonline 51(11), 1224–1229 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Pinedo, M.L.: Scheduling, vol. 29. Springer (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kempf, K., et al.: Evaluation and comparison of production schedules. Comput. Ind. 42(2–3), 203–220 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Demir, Y., İşleyen, S.K.: Evaluation of mathematical models for flexible job-shop scheduling problems. Appl. Math. Model. 37(3), 977–988 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Chaudhry, I.A., Khan, A.A.: A research survey: review of flexible job shop scheduling techniques. Int. Trans. Oper. Res. 23(3), 551–591 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Choi, I.-C., Choi, D.-S.: A local search algorithm for jobshop scheduling problems with alternative operations and sequence-dependent setups. Comput. Ind. Eng. 42(1), 43–58 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Shen, X.-N., Yao, X.: Mathematical modeling and multi-objective evolutionary algorithms applied to dynamic flexible job shop scheduling problems. Inf. Sci. 298, 198–224 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Brucker, P., Schlie, R.: Job-shop scheduling with multipurpose machines. Computing (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Xie, J., et al.: Review on flexible job shop scheduling. IET Collabor. Intell. Manufac. 1(3), 67–77 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Framinan, J.M., Fernandez-Viagas, V., Perez-Gonzalez, P.: Using real-time information to reschedule jobs in a flowshop with variable processing times. Comput. Ind. Eng. 129, 113–125 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Fernandez-Viagas, V., Framinan, J.M.: Exploring the benefits of scheduling with advanced and real-time information integration in Industry 4.0: a computational study. J. Indust. Inform. Integrat. 27, 100281 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Koh, L., Orzes, G., Jia, F.J.: The fourth industrial revolution (Industry 4.0): technologies disruption on operations and supply chain management. Int. J. Oper. Product. Manage. 39(6/7/8), 817–828 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Shen, L., Dauzère-Pérès, S., Neufeld, J.S.: Solving the flexible job shop scheduling problem with sequence-dependent setup times. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 265(2), 503–516 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research presented in this paper was conducted as part of the DigiMat project, with financial support from NTNU, the participating companies, and the Research Council of Norway.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mina Rahmani .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Rahmani, M., Romsdal, A., Syversen, Ø.A.M., Sgarbossa, F., Strandhagen, J.O. (2023). Production Scheduling Using Production Feedback Data; An Illustrative Case Study. In: Alfnes, E., Romsdal, A., Strandhagen, J.O., von Cieminski, G., Romero, D. (eds) Advances in Production Management Systems. Production Management Systems for Responsible Manufacturing, Service, and Logistics Futures. APMS 2023. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 691. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43670-3_59

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43670-3_59

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-43669-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-43670-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics